All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
You shouldn't be turning a screenplay discussion into a personal attack white wolf, it's 1 thing to preach your beliefs it's another to attack someone.
I hit a Home Run! I’ll hit instant re-play and slow it down for you...
What did I do? I made ‘inferences’ drawn from what you wrote. I did exactly what you did, didn’t I?
The only difference is that my ‘inferences’ can be disproved...
You are attempting to form conclusions from specious and or vague references. This is called inductive reasoning. This type of reasoning process would never be accepted in any educated circles. Perhaps that is why you have been reduced to this form of medium, as you have discovered you have been able to interest no audience.
There is an old saying: It is NOT what ‘is’ that counts, but rather how one ‘perceives’ what is. Get it?
I am done w/ this thread. I hope U take my advice and stop wasting precious time on such foolishness. e.g.
I have no aversions to discussing this topic. In fact, I encourage it, because one of two things will happen - either you reaffirm your own beliefs or adopt new ones. Either way, you grow and become closer to God. Isn't that the point?
Perhaps you need to look at the images with your own eyes so you can duly compare them side by side. Here are three URLS. Open each in a separate window and keep them all open at the same time. The first is the Shroud of Turin image. You can clearly see the decapitation mark across the throat. The second is the list of associated facial markings (wound IDs) used in art circles to identify "Jesus" in art. Each mark can be found on the Shroud image. The third image is of the mythical John the Baptist sculpture with all the markings of the wounds of the Christ AND is the very sculpture from which the Siena Cathedral JB statue was cast in bronze.
I also recommend you read Joseph Wheless's "Forgery in Christianity". Wheless was a 1920's court Judge, and bencher. He made a "federal case" against organized Christianity's doctrines and dogma, proving beyond reseasonable doubt that Christianity's origins were steeped in forgeries and fraudulent materials. It's a marvellous body of writing that heavily relies on the extant documentation of various historians, etc.
I also suggest you read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" and "The Messyanic Legacy" by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh & Henry Lincoln, for the full poop on the Vatican and its mercenary underling organization(s).
Lawrence Gardiner is another author very on top of the facts associated with this particular time in history.
Anyway, your first post was peppered with violence and the attack made against me was unnecessary. Instead of being so "holier than thou" in your attitude towards me, why not just discuss cordially?
I would think you might want to show your Christian side by maintaining a civil level of banter.
And if anyone should give up this foolishness, it is you, since you are the one who sees it that way. Most don't. In fact, you're the first person to "attack" me about "Magdalen's Reprieve". Others have highly praised its content (even though I'm still tweaking format and talking heads scenes).
In this day and age of revelation, exposure and scandal, you might want to take your defensive position down a notch to say, Yellow Alert, and take a look at ALL the evidences available. Mine is but a small portion of that truth.
I truly hope you find your peace. You're on the right road, simply by having questioned what you know versus what I've presented.
The only reason you haven't been banned from this discussion group as a troll is because of Ha'vah.
Please try and contrain yourself to the issues, rather than emotional reaction. This is a discussion about a script. Last comment on the issue. talk to the script. Talk about the script. Any more personalizing and not even Ha'vah can save you.
I think you will both be pleased to know that "Magdalen's Reprieve" will be going into pre-production, it seems, next month. The prodco wants to go DTV.
This is the deal I mentioned to you in late January, Don. They're waiting for the overseas funds to clear the Patriot Act, and then we're "off and running".
Being new to the processes of film making, I'm unclear as to how soon it will be on video. But, from what I've been told, probably one year.
So, you see, this is just one more reason why White Wolf is not a "concern". He's just another opinion, and I'm sure it reflects a portion of the reaction "Magdalen's Reprieve" will recieve once released in film.
For me, this is just another training exercise. Since White Wolf is not the only person who will react this way, he's practice for me for when the rest of his "type" do swarm the issue.
First, I must clarify I did not say anything about it being a hoax. I suggested he read a book written by a judge which proves conclusively that parts of religious dogma and doctrine are based on contrived, or erroneous, data. There's an excellent example the judge includes, which I verified, that proves that the translator of the scriptures (Jerome 400 A.D.) accidentally mistranslated an important word. When he realised his error, he brought it to the attention of the impratur. Jerome was told to just forget it, it was too late to make any changes.
What was the transliteration error Jerome tried to correct? That the word translated in error as "virgin" really meant "woman of child-bearing capability". So, the doctrine professing absolute faith that "Jesus" was born of a "virgin" is based in error. "Jesus" was actually born of a "woman of child-bearing capability" - which is no miracle, since that's how we all got here.
So, Christianity isn't a hoax. But some of the things expected to be believed without question, are contrived and should be questioned.
The Catholic institution has always had its own henchman all through history. The Church condemns hoards of people to death throughout the ages and has other people carry out its judgment. Does this qualify as "the Vatican really hires hitmen"? I'd have to say so, though back then they were more mercs than anything. However, evidence has been tabled that shows this statement to be quite true, in fact, the origins of the CIA have been linked directly to the Vatican. Are we surprised? Not any more. Sixteen-hundred years of slaughter and mayhem in the name of God, and suddenly we question if the Vatican orders the death of people?
I'm sorry. I didn't avoid the questions. I simply did not respond to a false accusation. I never said Christianity was a hoax. Those were white wolf's choice of words. What I did do was list two books he could check for himself to make an INFORMED decision about such matters, instead of simply ranting glib.
Pages: 
Author
Magdalen's Reprieve
Logged
Locked Board