SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 25th, 2024, 6:43pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    One Week Challenge    Scarefest Script Club  ›  Cry No More - SSC2WC Moderators: Zack
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Cry No More - SSC2WC  (currently 2581 views)
James McClung
Posted: March 2nd, 2017, 10:40am Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48
Hey Pedro,

Somehow or another, I made it all the way through this script. I did take a break a little over halfway through, which helped, but I could've easily just left it there. I like to finish what I started if it's not *too* painful, however, and honestly the script wasn't as painful to get through as I initially thought.

That said, I'll repeat previous comments that the script is stricken with typos, possibly the most I've ever seen in a script. I understand that English is not your first language, but I still think you could've cleaned up a substantial portion of them with at least one more review. At the very least, DNA shouldn't have been a typo, certainly not twice; it's only three letters and they're ALL IN CAPS.

To be fair, I could tell many of the typos were indeed a result of the language barrier. It also seems like you had a very specific vision for this script in terms of descriptions, which I think you made an admiral effort to realize. Even if you were using a translator, many of the word choices in the script were specific enough where the translator would've have spat them out if you hadn't entered an equally specific word/phrase to begin with. That said, I think such a vision would be extra incentive to comb through the script a few more times to make sure the typos were at a minimum.

In any case, the writing wasn't the only issue here; the whole thing is really overstuffed. Too many characters with little characterization for any of them. Too much world-building without any context. I couldn't tell where any of this was supposed to take place, given the strangeness of everything else going on (another planet, perhaps?). What's the purpose of the research facility, and who runs it?

All of this is compounded by the fact that the script moves extremely fast without anything getting a proper explanation. Things quickly become confusing/overwhelming. Somehow I found the broken English to offset this somehow, like Conz said. Not sure why that's the case, but it took the edge off. Still, it's all just too much of everything.

The reveal at the end feels tacked on and falls flat as a result. If might've helped if you made any mention of Ronald having a daughter at some earlier point. Perhaps even drop some hints that his state of mind isn't all that straight. Ronald is completely blank as a character, so all this business with Peter being an alterego or whatever is just a bunch of random shit thrown in at the last minute. You could've had the same thing happen to any of the other characters and it would've had the same effect.

Some miscellaneous notes...

- "Was it his blood?" - If they found Peter full of bullet holes, would've they assume it was his blood? Also, who the fuck is lying in the vessel anyway? Peter? Ronald? What do the other characters even see? Is any of this even happening, or is it all in Ronald's head.

...come to think of it, not so miscellaneous. You gotta square the logic of these earlier scenes away somehow.

- On a related note, I'm assuming Susan is the female voice at the beginning, not the nurse. If that's the case, how would she know something as specific as why he got shot and not know who he is or where he came from?

...again, this is a note I had written down earlier, but it doesn't make sense given the ending. Susan's supposedly dead so... WTF is going on here?

pg. 14 - You seem to switch Roy and Ronald's names around somehow.

- Finally, why would Ronald cut his throat if he just cut his wrists? I doubt it'd be an easy thing to do. He's gonna die anyway, so why even go through the extra pain? Speaking of which, why cut both of his arms?

So yeah. It seems like you had a strong vision for this, but at this point, it's kind of a mess. Even without the typos/language issues, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Probably not the best story to tell in 18 pages, really. It was supposed to be 15, so really, doesn't seem like anything meant for a small scale.

Hope this helps.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 15 - 22
PedroS
Posted: March 2nd, 2017, 4:09pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Posts
56
Posts Per Day
0.02
Hey James,

your absolutely right.
It was too much to get into the story.
I've f***** up, but I'll try my best to avoid those things in the future.
I've wrote it completely new, submitted it and hope, that it will create a better feeling.
Thank you for taking the time to read through all of this. I really appreciate this!

Wish you the best,

Pedro
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 16 - 22
JEStaats
Posted: March 4th, 2017, 5:16pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


No sh*t, there I was....

Location
Tucson, AZ
Posts
1736
Posts Per Day
0.62
Hola Pedro - Yo leo tu revision segundo (como mi espanol?). Apologies if otherwise

Enough of that... good news is that your story is more linear and easier to follow. Bad news is the translation still needs a lot of work and it's WAY overwritten. I can say that because I have a habit of overwriting. A lot of parenthetical use too.

I liked the reveal at the end with Eva in the cage and her reaction but there are still many inconsistencies in the logic (there's that word logic again).

Also loved your descriptions of the mass murder scene. Very reminiscent of 'Event Horizon'.

Great effort Pedro - keep at it!
John
Logged
Private Message Reply: 17 - 22
DanC
Posted: March 5th, 2017, 2:15am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Killing villains since 1980!

Location
Buffalo NY
Posts
1131
Posts Per Day
0.34
Hey Pedro,  I agree with John.  While it is better, you still have a lot to clean up.  I'd
Look into software to help you with the language issues.

The story is better, but still far too overwritten in places.  It seems easier to follow, so that is awesome.  

I think if you fix it up, you could have a pretty good story.  Perhaps you could make this more of a race against time story.  Also, find creative ways to keep the other guy following your lead.  There were plenty of times then I wondered why he followed him, especially after he said that he wouldn't.  I found myself thinking that then it's too unbelievable.

Only when you explain the ending does it make sense, and I think that should be fixed.

Good luck with it.

Dan


Please read my scripts:
http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-series/m-1427564706/

I'm interested in reading animation, horror, sci fy, suspense, fantasy, and anything that is good.  I enjoy writing the same.  Looking to team with anyone!

Thanks
Dan
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 22
PedroS
Posted: March 5th, 2017, 5:35pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Posts
56
Posts Per Day
0.02

Quoted from JEStaats
Hola Pedro - Yo leo tu revision segundo (como mi espanol?). Apologies if otherwise

Enough of that... good news is that your story is more linear and easier to follow. Bad news is the translation still needs a lot of work and it's WAY overwritten. I can say that because I have a habit of overwriting. A lot of parenthetical use too.

I liked the reveal at the end with Eva in the cage and her reaction but there are still many inconsistencies in the logic (there's that word logic again).

Also loved your descriptions of the mass murder scene. Very reminiscent of 'Event Horizon'.

Great effort Pedro - keep at it!
John



Hola John - your spanish is good! I read yours to, mi amigo.
But I'm from Brazil and I speak Portuguese

Thank you so much for taking the efforts to read my second draft.
I'm very happy that it was easier to follow and you're absolutely right - There are definitely some logic mistakes. I need to practice this short stories more! And I'm going to work on the parenthetical-problem. Good advise!

Thank you for your inspiring feedback. I'll keep your advises in mind.

Pedro
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 19 - 22
PedroS
Posted: March 5th, 2017, 5:40pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Posts
56
Posts Per Day
0.02

Quoted from DanC
Hey Pedro,  I agree with John.  While it is better, you still have a lot to clean up.  I'd
Look into software to help you with the language issues.

The story is better, but still far too overwritten in places.  It seems easier to follow, so that is awesome.  

I think if you fix it up, you could have a pretty good story.  Perhaps you could make this more of a race against time story.  Also, find creative ways to keep the other guy following your lead.  There were plenty of times then I wondered why he followed him, especially after he said that he wouldn't.  I found myself thinking that then it's too unbelievable.

Only when you explain the ending does it make sense, and I think that should be fixed.

Good luck with it.

Dan



Hey Dan,

thank you for taking the time to made it through my second draft.
I really appreciate it.
Your words are motivating me to become better.
You definitely made a point with the grammar and with the idea of making the process a little more complex. I'll keep that in mind for the next story.
I'm very happy that you see potential in my story and that it was easier to read through.
Very positive for me - It seems like I'm making a small progress - YES, finally!

I wish you well my friend.
Thank you again.

Pedro
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 20 - 22
ChrisBodily
Posted: March 7th, 2017, 12:39am Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Posts
572
Posts Per Day
0.17
FADE IN: always goes on the left, never the right.

Right out of the gate, it's overwritten. Sometimes it works, but in your script, it's too much. Sometimes, simple is better. Less is more. I would trim the hell out of your opening paragraph.

The second paragraph, I would break up into two... or even three.


Quoted Text
RONALD
What in the good name of God?


A little too dramatic/Shakespeare. I'd change it to


Quoted Text
RONALD
What in God's name...?


This does in four words what it took you seven words to do.


Quoted Text
PETER
We’ve come [We're too late.] (or) [T]oo late.



Quoted Text
Ronald is looking [looks] suspiciously at some
ripped pieces of paper.


Try to avoid passive writing.


Quoted Text
On one of the pieces [pages] is written:


Reads better, imo.


Quoted Text
Ronald moves to Peter, who is looking at something on the
ground, hidden behind a metallic cupboard.


This is how you write an action line. This tells us everything we need to know in a clear and concise manner.

I'd move the word "silently" to either before "raises" or after "arm."


Quoted Text
Ronald moves his glance to Peter[']s discovery [glances at Peter].



Quoted Text
In front of Peter is [are] the bloody remains, of something which what used to be an arm.


It still reads weird, but it's less awkward than what you wrote.


Quoted Text
(holding his hand in front of
his mouth)


This parenthetical (don't overuse these!) is too long! They should only be one line long, and used sparingly; actors hate these. How would you like to be told how to say a line?   It could just as easily be "(covers his mouth)".

"The emergency?" I'd change it to 911, which I'd write out as Nine-One-One Actually, drop the police; 911 is a catch-all for cops, paramedics, and the fire department. All three respond to each emergency, regardless if it actually concerns them.

"I don't [have] a (my?) phone with me."


Quoted Text
In the office room
is a telephone, which we can use.


Terrible line. I'm sorry. It should read:


Quoted Text
We can use the office phone.



Quoted Text
We should leave this place, right
now!


The paragraph after CLANK! is too long. Let's clean it up some more.


Quoted Text
Ronald’s looks down at the ground.

His foot has hit(s) a small silver bracelet. He kneels down, picks it up and inspects it.

It has three small pendants on it.

Two silver hearts and a silver bear with a small pink jewel in it.

His hands start to tremble as he gazes at the small bracelet [it].


I'm on page 2. Not the best start, I'm afraid. This is about the same page I bailed on your first draft.

Who's Eva? Oh, never mind.


Quoted Text
PETER
What are you talking, Ron? Why
should she be here! This makes no
sense at all. The only rational
thing is
[we need] to leave this place...
(looking at the scratched
metallic walls)

...And this as soon as we can.


"Loren is also here." "Loren's also here." Do these characters ever use contractions?

"What are you talking [about]? If it so"

You're overusing parentheticals.


Quoted Text
PETER
First: We stay together, no matter
what happen(s). Second: We don’t put
us under unnecessary [in] danger and
third: If we don’t find them in one
hour, we’ll leave. and get back with
help.


"I’ve got a bad feeling about this."

I didn't know this was a Star Wars script.  

"Two slide doors moves"

A specific army should be capitalized. I love the line, though. Made me chuckle.


Quoted Text
PETER
Why do I have the bad feeling, that
we don’t wanna find out the answer
of that.


I'd honestly cut this line. More dramatic.


Quoted Text
PETER
(looking at the bloody keypad)
in the wall)
It has [There's] a good reason, why we both
work in different sections.
(typing some numbers in)
In my workplace - the baddest
accidents were spilled coffees or
empty toilet papers.


This parapgraph, I would break up, starting at "Dozens of tables". It'sd still overwritten, though.

[quote]His eyes widen, he falls on his knees and some vomit(s.) crawls
up his throat and finds its way out, through his mouth.


The paragraph about the corpse is too long and overwritten, even if you broke it up into four or five paragraphs.

I'm halfway into it. I'll have to stop here. Sorry. Too many issues with this one, but still an improvement on the first draft.


FADE IN:
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 21 - 22
PedroS
Posted: March 7th, 2017, 5:06pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Posts
56
Posts Per Day
0.02

Quoted from ChrisBodily
FADE IN: always goes on the left, never the right.

Right out of the gate, it's overwritten. Sometimes it works, but in your script, it's too much. Sometimes, simple is better. Less is more. I would trim the hell out of your opening paragraph.

The second paragraph, I would break up into two... or even three.



A little too dramatic/Shakespeare. I'd change it to



This does in four words what it took you seven words to do.





Try to avoid passive writing.



Reads better, imo.



This is how you write an action line. This tells us everything we need to know in a clear and concise manner.

I'd move the word "silently" to either before "raises" or after "arm."





It still reads weird, but it's less awkward than what you wrote.



This parenthetical (don't overuse these!) is too long! They should only be one line long, and used sparingly; actors hate these. How would you like to be told how to say a line?   It could just as easily be "(covers his mouth)".

"The emergency?" I'd change it to 911, which I'd write out as Nine-One-One Actually, drop the police; 911 is a catch-all for cops, paramedics, and the fire department. All three respond to each emergency, regardless if it actually concerns them.

"I don't [have] a (my?) phone with me."



Terrible line. I'm sorry. It should read:





The paragraph after CLANK! is too long. Let's clean it up some more.



I'm on page 2. Not the best start, I'm afraid. This is about the same page I bailed on your first draft.

Who's Eva? Oh, never mind.



"Loren is also here." "Loren's also here." Do these characters ever use contractions?

"What are you talking [about]? If it so"

You're overusing parentheticals.



"I’ve got a bad feeling about this."

I didn't know this was a Star Wars script.  

"Two slide doors moves"

A specific army should be capitalized. I love the line, though. Made me chuckle.



I'd honestly cut this line. More dramatic.



This parapgraph, I would break up, starting at "Dozens of tables". It'sd still overwritten, though.

[quote]His eyes widen, he falls on his knees and some vomit(s.) crawls
up his throat and finds its way out, through his mouth.


The paragraph about the corpse is too long and overwritten, even if you broke it up into four or five paragraphs.

I'm halfway into it. I'll have to stop here. Sorry. Too many issues with this one, but still an improvement on the first draft.


Chris, I can't honestly not thank you enough for taking these much efforts.
Your breakthrough teaches me a lot and I'll learn as good as I can from it to avoid those mistakes and get a smooth style like you showed.
Thank you so much for your feedback, mate.

I wish you well,

Pedro
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 22 - 22
 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Scarefest Script Club  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006