There were 29 entries of which 20 scripts were submitted across 19 different series.  Note: There were three authors who chose not to submit anonymously. While they will be able to vote for Writer's Choice, they won't be eligible for the Writer's Choice.

Voting sheets forthcoming.

Enjoy!

- Don


12 O'Clock High: Mona Lisa Bombs by General Motors - Series, Action - An elite bomber crew is tasked with a rather unusual mission. 21 pages

VR Troopers by Shaggy - Series, Action, Sci Fi - When the consequences of a Virtual Reality game bleed into the real world, a girl and her unlikely group of friends must find a way to set things back to normal.

Friday The 13th: Crystal Lake Campfire Stories by The Invisible Man - Series, Horror - What better place to tell a campfire story than Camp Crystal Lake?

Gomer Pyle USMC: Gomer Pyle Has Kids by D Scott Mangione - Series, Comedy - When Gomer Pyle discovers his old girlfriend is pregnant with another man's baby, he must break-up with the Commander's daughter to marry his true love and start a family.

Miami Vice: A New Darkness by Eric Dixon - Series, Action - Vice detective JJ Baumbach forms a temporary partnership with flashy, silk suit wearing federal agent Lionel Hayes as the two infiltrate the dark underbelly of organized crime in Miami.   24 pages

Becker: Pilot by ? - Series, Comedy - Same old Becker only older and meaner shows his hatred for life and everything around him in a retirement home. 23 pages

Thundarr The Barbarian by Antonio del Sole (Based on characters created by Steve Gerber, Joe Ruby, and Ken Spears) - Series, Sci Fi, Fantasy,  - In a post apocalypse wasteland ruled with mysticism and recycled technology, three heroes will stand up against the tyranny of a malevolent wizard as they escort two refugees out of the ruins of Manhattan. 24 pages

Space Ghost: "Bury the Ghosts" by Herculoid Poirot - Series, Action, Drama, Superhero - When Moltar kills his sidekick, a still-grieving Space Ghost must put the past behind him in order to face Zorak. 17 pages

Family Ties: I want one! Me too! by Marty McFly - Series, Comedy - Alex tries to take advantage of some environmentalists. Danny is forced to work with his father in law. 15 pages

Quincy G.I.:  "Dancing On Coals" by ? - Series, Crime, Mystery - In the ruins of post war Germany, a young Quincy tracks a murderer hiding amongst the bloodshed. 20 pages

Elm Street: Pilot by That’s So Craven - Series, Horror - A student journalist works to uncover horrifying secrets in the not-so-sleepy town of Springwood.

Branded: "The Lone Ranger" by ? - Series, Action - Wrongfully accused of cowardice and drummed out of the Army, he must prove that he is a man. 14 pages

Knight Rider by David Hasselhoff - Series, Action - A special operative and an A.I. powered car full of gadgets and weapons are determined to take down the hostile A.I. responsible for destroying their organization. 24 pages

Quantam Leap by Ziggy - Series, Adventure - In search of her father, lost in the time stream, an adventurous scientist travels back to the LA Riots of 1992 to save an angry youth from a needless death. 20 pages

The Knight Rider by Dynamic Duo - Series, Action - In the California desert, a prototype that was never meant to see the light of day has been awakened. Now Michael Knight, a wealthy teenage loner, must drive the very car that could be responsible for his father's disappearance.

The Lone Ranger: Issue 1: Origin by Who was that masked man? (Based on the original story, The Lone Ranger by Fran Striker) - Series, Sci Fi, Thriller - A Texas Ranger exacts revenge against the criminals that murdered his family.

Monsters by Gustav Kottmann - Series, Crime, Thriller - A 30 years old experiment that once took place in East Germany to create perfect soldiers through psychological reprogramming finds a new host on the U.S. soil.

Rise of Columbo: Episode 1: Two Personalities Makes One Kill by I'm Just Like Totally Stoked To Be Here (Created by Richard Levinson
& William Link) - Series, Crime - On his flight to his new L.A. job,  the young Sergeant Columbo already has to solve a murder.

Dexter's Laboratory: The Laboratory by Masatotai - Series, Horror - {no logline}

Happy Days by Someone - Series, Drama - When Richie is involved in an automobile accident, it leads to a series of unfortunate events, including the death of a mystery man. 21 pages

Awesome! I know what I'm reading at work tonight.

~Zack~

Nearly halfway through and so far there's a surprising amount of scripts with small child murder in them... I ain't no snow flake, but we all good ladies and gents??? Does anyone need a virtual internet hug?? I reckon I do

Quoted from PrussianMosby Hey, Just got one idea that may help some of us getting familar with the shows they don't know. I myself want to look into , or possibly even watch one episode fully, of the shows that I don't know. So, while researching in the next days when reading, I could post the respective youtube address of each show that I find content of here -- or better even into a new thread determined only for "watching". I even would send an embedded version that you can literally watch straightaway. Hope this makes snese

Don and Dan have a link to an episode or trailer for each of the shows here:

http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-may2018/m-1526919529/

Gary

Quoted from Gary in Houston Don and Dan have a link to an episode or trailer for each of the shows here: http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-may2018/m-1526919529/ Gary

okay

Quoted from Cameron Nearly halfway through and so far there's a surprising amount of scripts with small child murder in them... I ain't no snow flake, but we all good ladies and gents??? Does anyone need a virtual internet hug?? I reckon I do

That's a cake walk around here, giving most OWCs.  

I simply followed the directions in my submission which included my name and board user name, then received an email saying it should've been anonymous.  Oh well.

Quoted from ericdickson I simply followed the directions in my submission which included my name and board user name, then received an email saying it should've been anonymous.  Oh well.

That is what you’re supposed to do. You must have had your name inside the document somewhere (perhaps right after the word “by” on the title page?).

Some people have their email on the title page which tells us who they are.

DOH!  slap my forehead

I put my name on title page

Quoted from ericdickson DOH!  slap my forehead I put my name on title page

Eric,

I probably should have be been more explicit in my email...  I also note that in the discussion release, there was no mention of anonymity. Tho there is mention in the actual submission.

So, some of this is on me, dawg.

Don

  

Quoted from DarrenJamesSeeley That's a cake walk around here, giving most OWCs.

I've read 10 now and 5 have kiddie slaughter in them... 50 flipping percent!!! And Happy Days was about two scenes away from it I swear, don't mess with the Fonzzzz

Kill your darlings...

Quoted from Cameron I've read 10 now and 5 have kiddie slaughter in them... 50 flipping percent!!! And Happy Days was about two scenes away from it I swear, don't mess with the Fonzzzz

Haven't reasd the Happy Days yet, but I'll get to it. Seeing how the trend in the OWCs are going, I expect Fonz to kill baby sharks after jumping them  

Wow. Somehow, I'm already halfway done. I still have A LOT of shows to get re/acquainted with. I thought I'd watch the half-hour shows first so I could get this done faster.

So far, I have liked all but two entries. And of all the shows I've sampled, the only one I didn't like was The Lone Ranger. Too slow, too boring. In serious need of a reboot. Too bad that reboot didn't deliver and, imo, was equally as boring as the 1949 pilot.

But overall, pretty good selection this month.

I’m a little more than halfway done. Some impressive entries so far.  I will say I’m disappointed in the lack of Comments so far.  Don’t know if the page count is scaring readers off but you would think that at least all the participants would be commenting as well. Maybe some of the newbies don’t know about the quid pro quo system of reviews here.

Also, when does this end? I haven’t seen a countdown clock for reviews to be in so I’m guessing it goes through next week?

Gary

I distinctly remember: two weeks to write, two weeks to review.  Got another week to review I think, after this one.

Good - thanks Libby!

I'm with ya, Gary. I'm about halfway as well and have been wondering when everyone else was going to start chiming in. Many of the reviews are from writers that had stated early on that they weren't participating too. Unless, of course, it was all a ploy...? Nah, no one here ever does that;)

I'm hoping to start reading again today and be through by the weekend. Some good stuff, so far. Let's get reviewing, writers!

Quoted from JEStaats I'm with ya, Gary. I'm about halfway as well and have been wondering when everyone else was going to start chiming in. Many of the reviews are from writers that had stated early on that they weren't participating too. Unless, of course, it was all a ploy...? Nah, no one here ever does that;) I'm hoping to start reading again today and be through by the weekend. Some good stuff, so far. Let's get reviewing, writers!

Alas, I agree. I think there's three who haven't reviewed at all, but I'm not sure they realise they're supposed to. Kinda the usual jazz on that front unfortunately, but with even less reviews this time than normal

Gotta hand it to Chrisbodily and his painstakingly detailed reviews.

Love the pairing of dialog to song lyrics. Great entertainment! Cheers!

Quoted from JEStaats Gotta hand it to Chrisbodily and his painstakingly detailed reviews. Love the pairing of dialog to song lyrics. Great entertainment! Cheers!

Thank you.

If anything in the script reminds me of a song (especially a good one), I cant help myself.

Uh oh.

Sugar Pie, Honey Bunch
You know that I love you
I can't help myself
I love you and nobody else  

I'm actually surprised I'm this far along, considering...

1. I didn't know until Monday that the Blumhouse Halloween trailer would be dropping this Friday [June 8], with epic goodies and extras every day in the interim. As a result, Twitter and the Halloween message boards are in a frenzy. In fact, the official thread on OHMB balloons to at least 20 pages every day.

2. The special-effects makeup game show Face Off came back  this week for its (supposedly) final season.

So it's been a busy week. I'm so grateful we have two weeks to re/acquaint ourselves and then read hundreds of pages of scripts. If we only had one week, I probably would have withdrawn by now because I'm so tied up.

Sisters and brothers,

there are too few reviews going....My take: a lot of writers seem to be hurt by negative perception of their material. The writers gave it their all... Respect

Six more to go...

For the most part, I've been impressed with the posts and the overall quality of reviews. I think the comments from the last couple OWC's and WT about being swayed by previous reviews was taken to heart. I think most are commenting before reading other posts.

Back to it....

Sorry guys
I was on bed rest but feel better now.

Yes 2 weeks to review.

Are there any awards you'd like to seelike best adaptation, best concept, best chance to sell etc

Dan

I personally think an SS mug is kudos enough...

Good to hear you're feeling better, Dan.

Quoted from LC I personally think an SS mug is kudos enough...

Lol.

Quoted from PrussianMosby Sisters and brothers, there are too few reviews going....My take: a lot of writers seem to be hurt by negative perception of their material. The writers gave it their all... Respect

I didn't enter, but I've read a few. I was sick this week. Spent three days in bed with a high fever. I love my grandkids, but they sure are little germ factories.  

Quoted from Grandma Bear I didn't enter, but I've read a few. I was sick this week. Spent three days in bed with a high fever. I love my grandkids, but they sure are little germ factories.

Haha. I know what you mean. Those little poopers send me to flu-land whenever one of them has a cold. So, get well soon and thanks for participating without an entry in this race.

Hmm, possibly there's also little traffic because any talk here in the "chat" would end with breadcrumbs since every entry somehow has a individual topic this time... so we cannot really communicate and exchange about the writing process, concepts and so on.

I just hope that some writers aren't sad because of a negative critique and bail early from the challenge in front of these masses to read.

Soooooo....voting out soon. What's the protocol for voting for named author scripts where you know the writer has not written a single review???

Sorry to open that can of worms but the lack of reviews are starting to get to me.

I've read six or seven so far. Been working a lot, but will try my best to read the rest of them by next Friday.

~Zack~

Quoted from Zack I've read six or seven so far. Been working a lot, but will try my best to read the rest of them by next Friday. ~Zack~

Zack,

I'm going to extend the voting timeframe a few days or so.  Don't sweat it.

- Don

Thanks Don,

I know it's hard to get around the extended page count but just feel a bit demoralised about the lack of reads this time around after putting something together. We've all got real life to contend with so obviously this screenplay scrimmage isn't, and certainly shouldn't be, a priority but I kinda was hoping for a little bit more on the reading front.

Maybe it'll all come good in the end but it just sucks a little knowing you've done the legwork for everyone else, fingers crossed an extended deadline will help.

Cam

Quoted from Cameron Thanks Don, I know it's hard to get around the extended page count but just feel a bit demoralised about the lack of reads this time around after putting something together. We've all got real life to contend with so obviously this screenplay scrimmage isn't, and certainly shouldn't be, a priority but I kinda was hoping for a little bit more on the reading front. Maybe it'll all come good in the end but it just sucks a little knowing you've done the legwork for everyone else, fingers crossed an extended deadline will help. Cam

The page count makes it tough.  The reads take much longer hence the extended voting time.  

- Don

Quoted from Cameron Soooooo....voting out soon. What's the protocol for voting for named author scripts where you know the writer has not written a single review??? Sorry to open that can of worms but the lack of reviews are starting to get to me.

I used to be so much more active on SS and wrote dozens of reviews and did script exchanges almost constantly.  Unfortunately, real life got in the way and I've been out of it for quite a long time.  Also, there were some real trolls on these boards for years and years that I just couldn't handle anymore, but they all seemed to have finally disappeared.  Thank God.   I've just recently done my first script swap on SS in probably six years.  I can say this.  The quality of writers and work has gone up dramatically since I first joined the site.  

Hey Jack,

Nice to know that you're back on board and enjoying it again. The main point above is come the OWCs, all participants are supposed to at least try and review each other's work, nominally 5 scripts to qualify for voting has been done previously (if memory serves me well).

Im guessing it's your first challenge (the naming of the author on your script gave it away), but the reviewing part I'd say is more important than the writing, as you learn more and see the spread and diversity of work. I think yours has got about 8 different reviewers thus far, maybe share the love.

All the best,

Cam

I don't know why I'm bothering, but yeah, I'm rewriting my entry a little. Not a ton, because I'm generally satisfied with it. Reading a recent script in the OWC helped with my decision.

Quoted from DarrenJamesSeeley I don't know why I'm bothering, but yeah, I'm rewriting my entry a little. Not a ton, because I'm generally satisfied with it. Reading a recent script in the OWC helped with my decision.

Yep, I'm with you Darren. I set my eyes on one particular piece of work that even though I didn't like the overall storyline, it was that good for technical bits and writing style I'm definitely bookmarking it for a pilfering (learning and adoption) session.

So, that's them all done for myself. Loads of variety and lots of really good work, will be really interested to see what comes out on top. Looks like it's currently between a handful of goodies.

Things I noticed/liked:

1. Thank God someone else (Hawkeye) was getting a bit miffed with all the child murder!!! It seemed to stop after a while, but then I wanted to murder some of the characters in other scripts so it may have left a mark.

2. Chris Bodily. Whoever you are, mate, those reviews of yours are amazing, never change.

3. I guess we'll never know how many dead bodies Potsie has seen, especially if he's been hanging around with the Fonz...

4. Lone ranger heros who ride motorcycles should never adopt a Labrador puppy, it's not fair and it'll never work out from a scale perspective. If they really insist on a puppy a Maltese could work, or maybe a miniature dachshund. Avoid a great Dane.

Really enjoyed it, hope more reviews come in, much love and respect to all participants and reviewers,

Cam

I just got back from a 4-day camping trip that last week was largely devoted to prepping for. I'm ready to dive in to reading and commenting more this week.

I was in Vegas from very early Thursday.  Just got back late yesterday.

I did not enter, but I was going to try and read and comment on as many as I could, but with such a pathetic turnout, in terms of peeps who did enter, but decided not to read and comment on the other entries, I think I'm done.

Very, very happy I did not enter, as I would have been livid with the lack of comments.  

Just finished my last review. A lot of good writing on display here. Great efforts and congrats to all for entering. I’m now going to go hide under a rock in dismay at how bad my entry was in comparison.  Ha ha!  Just kidding. I’m going to just drink a lot instead.

Quoted from Dreamscale I was in Vegas from very early Thursday.  Just got back late yesterday. I did not enter, but I was going to try and read and comment on as many as I could, but with such a pathetic turnout, in terms of peeps who did enter, but decided not to read and comment on the other entries, I think I'm done. Very, very happy I did not enter, as I would have been livid with the lack of comments.

No way!!! Has it been a whole year already since the last Vegas trip? You'll be sad to know that Michael Mann never optioned my "Jeff in Vegas" script from last year, sadly not even a sniff from anyone for some reason...

I'm going to come out of the closet too - I was in New York! But now I'm back to Baku and resuming the reads. Have about six left and plenty of time ahead of me. We got till Friday, right?

Wasn't the list of scripts extending two pages? Were some of the scripts taken out?

I just noticed the clock for ballots due June 22nd! Damn, another nine days!? Grumble....

I have three left.
Knight Rider
The Lone Ranger
and
Monsters

I can do it! And 9 days is more than plenty. I'm glad there are more days.
Nice work so far, I didn't expect such fine entries.

Quoted from JEStaats I just noticed the clock for ballots due June 22nd! Damn, another nine days!? Grumble....

Must... hold... response... to... script... comments...

I'm relieved for the extra time. I have 11 left. It's not that the reading takes a whole lot of time, but the extra pages offer more to give feedback on.

Thanks for the extra time. Haven't been feeling well the past couple of days and I could use the extra time to catch up.

~Zack~

Don truly extended the reviewing time??? Thank you so much, man. I'm going to the Netherlands the whole weekend and I wasn't clear how to manage the deadline.

Anyway,
I believe to be fair, when saying that I don't review Dexter, Miami Vice, and Gomer Pyle, because the respective writers, who revealed themselves, didn't review other scripts so far. And I just see those have an equal number of reviews as others, which is wrong, imo. Wake up, folks…

Otherwise, I never had a challenge with so many satisfying scripts. Originally, I am an assh**** regarding my usual evaluation -- 30 scripts = 2-3 recommends -- here, this time, it's simple, it's going to rain recommends from my side... great scripts

Alex, I believe The writer of Miami Vice goes by Jack. He's reviewing. Just saying)

Hey Kham, ahmmm what can I say... He reviewed ONE script, Elm Street.  You probably know, that when logged in, you can follow the comments of a member?

I think I didn't lie here. Do you have an entry yourself?

There are a number of scripts where I haven't commented because I didn't have anything to say that wasn't already said. Leaving some blanks also helps mask which script I wrote (I'm not famous enough for anyone to recognize my writing).

That said, I'm not completely done yet, and might find reason to chime in a few more times between now and the deadline.

Quoted from PrussianMosby You probably know, that when logged in, you can follow the comments of a member?

Really? Teach me how to do that! Please)

Quoted from FrankM There are a number of scripts where I haven't commented because I didn't have anything to say that wasn't already said.

Why? Don't read other comments at first... You need to confirm what is good  imo

Quoted from FrankM There are a number of scripts where I haven't commented because I didn't have anything to say that wasn't already said. Leaving some blanks also helps mask which script I wrote (I'm not famous enough for anyone to recognize my writing). That said, I'm not completely done yet, and might find reason to chime in a few more times between now and the deadline.

Oh, there are ways to throw them off the tracks! 😊

Quoted from khamanna Really? Teach me how to do that! Please)

Okay, step one: you click directly on the Name, say PRUSSIAN MOSBY

then you automatically go to the profile of respective user

Two: there's a button  -- Find latest posts of this member

Quoted from PrussianMosby Okay, step one: you click directly on the Name, say PRUSSIAN MOSBY then you automatically go to the profile of respective user Two: there's a button  -- Find latest post of this member

Thank you) it's like finding a new toy to play with for me. I'm rereading my own comments when I should get back to the entries.

As to your last question - I think I might have seen it in a pile)

All right khamanna, the chat is on--

No... I have no clue what you've written

Are you satisfied by your entry or not so-

I must admit that I threw myself into this OWC without being fully hip to the concept and rules.  I take it this is to be reviewed and judged only by the other entrants?  My bad.  Obviously, I wasn't totally hip to the OWC guidelines since I put my name on the title page.  

I perused most of these scripts just to check out the competition but haven't read them to completion or taken careful notes.  I guess since I've been disqualified I quit caring as much but I'll be sure to post my thoughts on the scripts in the next couple days.


How do you officially vote?  I guess I need some more explanation.  


  

Quoted from FrankM There are a number of scripts where I haven't commented because I didn't have anything to say that wasn't already said..

You don't always have to be specific. You can always say why you liked a script or disliked a script. Favorite/least favorite characters or scenes, and, as far as this OWC goes, a comparison bewtween the "new re-imagined" fan script exerciser (a point, by the way, a notice seveal readers of most scripts forget) as compared to the source.

It is unfortunate that some peeps read responses before reviewing and have the comments, good or bad, influence their own subjective views. Or don't comment in fear that it might.

And, as mentioned, if a number of folks see a story or character problem, there is nothing wrong with you confirming it. Or, if you disagree, debunking it.  If anyone cares to read reviews  that they already commented on, would anyone be stunned to find that at least half of the reads mention, say, the same spelling errors? You'd think by X time the point was made to the writer, but there it is again in a new comment. Nobody gives it another thought. Maybe someone's review missed a typo and you didn't.


There's always something you can add, subtract, give an opinion on.

BTW, There is nothing...ahemmmm...wrong....with...commenting on your own script, just don't get too inside baseball (*i.e. 'wonderful insight' saying things only the scribe would know)  and don't reveal yourself. No long essays, I mean, you know, if you are really worried about revealing yourself or just want to mess with folks. Just don't make yours the only comment you give.

Quoted from ericdickson ...  I take it this is to be reviewed and judged only by the other entrants?  My bad.  Obviously, I wasn't totally hip to the OWC guidelines since I put my name on the title page.   I perused most of these scripts just to check out the competition but haven't read them to completion or taken careful notes.  I guess since I've been disqualified I quit caring as much but I'll be sure to post my thoughts on the scripts in the next couple days. How do you officially vote?  I guess I need some more explanation.

The reviewing part? Not necessarily. Some of us review even though we don't have an entry. I reviewed a few this time around that sparked my interest. When I enter I review them all or at least review most/read all, otherwise I don't feel qualified to vote, although the voting ballot often includes a 'did not read' option on individual entries.

It's good to partake and get into the spirit of the challenge.

Btw, Don usually emails a voting ballot.

Woho! Thanks, Don. With more time to review, I will most definitely review all of them! Higher quality reviews even. I think we should always do the challenge this way. Two weeks to write. Maybe not 24-page limit, but definitely more time to review. It's better this way. I sensed better quality scripts so far. The two-weeks thing is working.

I don’t see this two week thing becoming a trend. It was only turned into two weeks because the challenge parameters seemed to warrant a higher page count. Still, the challenges benefit from tighter restrictions and lower page counts. These things shouldn’t drag on like this, imo. I think with lower page count, 10 max, and a set list of criteria, gives most writers the opportunity to shine within the framework. And may the best writer win. And I only say this because I seem to write better within that construct. Maybe others think the same. I don’t know. Just my two cents.

Yes, let's keep the OWC as the One-Week Challenge. I don't mind a little extra time to read, especially if there are a lot of entries, but the fun is in the time crunch.

Having said that, a TDC (Ten-Day Challenge) would allow a second weekend for people who come up with an idea late or can't bang out 8 or 10 pages in time for the Friday cutoff.

My uneducated opinion is that it dilutes the excitement that is experienced when the contest first opens.  It'll be a month from when the contest first opened and I finding myself losing interest in the outcome. Maybe that's just me.  It could also be I know I'm not going to win so it doesn't matter to me if the results are announced next week or two months from now.  Okay, I'll crawl back under my rock now.

Okay, don't have much time to read any more of them, but might be able to squeeze another two or so in. If you'd like a read, pm me.

Yep, I'm with you on this one. The excitement has definitely fizzled.

Now move over and make room under that rock.

Come on guys, get out from under that rock there! Sure, it's not as rapid fire and manic as usual but it's still the OWC, or maybe TWC this time.

Rather than being a great night down the boozer where it starts off with best intentions, you have one too many, a few fights kick off here or there and someone wanders off with an empty pint glass (the mug) at the end, this has more of a laid back cocktail bar feel to it. I think there's been far less scrapping than usual so that may be part of why there's a relaxed, less sparky feel to it all.

That's not to say we need to get the gloves off to make it more fun as it's been fun enough already, in my modest opinion...

Quoted from JEStaats Yep, I'm with you on this one. The excitement has definitely fizzled. Now move over and make room under that rock.

Is there room for 1 more?

I got massive fun this time cause the quality is so good, so looking forward to read the rest after the we. Have a good one all!

Lest anyone thinks I’m being negative towards SS, I want to clarify that I love everything about SS and the fact that it has opened a ton of doors for me and introduced me to a lot of wonderful people (and a couple of a-holes, but that’s to be expected no matter where you park your caboose).  I loved this challenge and I really got into it.  My only qualm is the timing aspect — the last challenge seemed to go on for three months, and this one is going to hit a month before completion. Maybe that’s the new reality, and if so, that’s fine. I can adjust my expectations. After all, it’s free and fun, so we shouldn’t be demanding too much (keyword there being “free”).

Anyway, NOW I’ll crawl back under my rock (although I may have to find a new rock - it’s getting crowded under there).

Gary

Quoted from Gary in Houston Lest anyone thinks I’m being negative towards SS, I want to clarify that I love everything about SS and the fact that it has opened a ton of doors for me and introduced me to a lot of wonderful people (and a couple of a-holes, but that’s to be expected no matter where you park your caboose).  I loved this challenge and I really got into it.  My only qualm is the timing aspect — the last challenge seemed to go on for three months, and this one is going to hit a month before completion. Maybe that’s the new reality, and if so, that’s fine. I can adjust my expectations. After all, it’s free and fun, so we shouldn’t be demanding too much (keyword there being “free”). Anyway, NOW I’ll crawl back under my rock (although I may have to find a new rock - it’s getting crowded under there). Gary

You could demand your money back

I'm fairly new here, and apparently every contest I've witnessed (January TWC, March Madness, Writer's Tournament, May "O"WC) has been an extended-release formula. The first actual OWC I see here will probably seem frenetic by comparison.

Hey, is that the same rock people use to avoid spoilers ahead of major releases? I want to keep track of where that rock is for future reference.

Sorry for my lack of activity, been having some health issues. Feeling pretty good now, so I'll be downloading some of these scripts and reading them at work tonight. I'll give some reviews as soon as I get home. Any suggestions?

~Zack~

some notes:

I've forwarded the ballot to Dan to send out.  In additional to writers, he may include those non-participants who have been reading and commenting.

Writers who chose not to be anonymous have not been included in the ballot.

Tradition holds that one does not vote for ones self

We are just going for Writer's Choice.

As for the "non-reviewers"  Please note, some folks wait until after the event to post comments and he/she believes comments unduly influence voters.

As for those who weren't clear on parameters, please let me know how I can make them clearer on the submission form at simplyscripts.com/owc

I agree this has dragged on a long time.  The Two Weeks was an anomaly, but we committed to the concept and once committed we thought we should allow enough time to do it right.  The next OWC will be an One Week Challenge.  

- Don

It says "voting ballots due" and now it's in five days. Does that mean we have to turn them in by the end of the ticking clock?
Because I haven't received the ballot yet.

Voted. Only two scripts rose to four star level (out of 5 stars), and three more getting 3 stars or 3 1/2. I looked mostly for cohesiveness, characterization and story, regardless of whether I was familiar with the source material or not. Fun challenge, and thankful for the extra time. Thanks Don and Dan!

Steve

Quoted from SAC I looked mostly for cohesiveness, characterization, and story Steve

This is the most important criteria for me, too, cohesiveness especially.

I had two at excellent and three at VG (or four even, but three for sure). Quite a few goods.

A very challenging challenge it was. And a lot of fun, too. Great job, Dan.

And big thanks to Don, as always!

Quick note - the two that came out tops for me I’ve never seen an episode of. One I’d never even heard of.

Let's just hope that the winners actually gave some reviews. I'll be grabbing a pitchfork and a torch if they hadn't.

Quoted from JEStaats Let's just hope that the winners actually gave some reviews. I'll be grabbing a pitchfork and a torch if they hadn't.

Hahahaha, they may have to hide under that rock that Hawkeye and co are currently occupying, if that's the case of course...

Good challenge, regardless of the timescale and apparent lack of reviews. They were generally long scripts so I do understand that it'll have been tricky due to real world issues for everyone to go round all the houses, still there's a couple of days left so fingers crossed a few more reviewers pile in.

A couple of excellent, a couple of very good, shall be interested to see what comes out on top.

Ta Don (as usual) and Dan for the effort in putting this beast together,

Cam

Still got some reviews incoming from me! Sorry for my lack of activity. Been having some personal issues here lately.

~Zack~

I have 5 left to read.

Quoted from Zack Still got some reviews incoming from me! Sorry for my lack of activity. Been having some personal issues here lately. ~Zack~

By the sounds of things you definitely fall into the "real world issues" category. I wouldn't stress it Zach

Quoted from Cameron By the sounds of things you definitely fall into the "real world issues" category. I wouldn't stress it Zach

Wait, some of the people on this site live in the real world?!

Quoted from FrankM Wait, some of the people on this site live in the real world?!

Only occasionally, and not normally when this challenge thing comes around...

All done reading. All done voting.

Excellent = 9
Very Good = 3
Good = 2
Fair = 1
Poor = 4
Didn't read/DQ = 1 (I couldn't bear to read Quantam [sic] Leap. Any producer would have thrown out the script just for that misspelling alone. Apologies to the writer.)

Very impressive pool this month. All that extended time was worth it. Good luck to everybody.

When are the voting ballots due?

~Zack~

Nevermind. I'm dumb. Lol

Ballots due:

My ballot's in!

Some pretty damn good selections entered for this 'OWC'. I can't wait to revisit mine and post, what I think, something with prospect.

Good luck everyone.

I'd like to try to squeeze in a couple more reads before I submit my ballot.

~Zack~