All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Is it neccessary to use BACK TO SCENE after using a secondary heading? An example:
INT. RESTAURANT - NIGHT
MARK sits alone at a table. He raises a hand to call the WAITER.
MARK Could you turn on the TV, please?
The waiter turns on a TV.
Mark looks at the...
SCREEN
A REPORTER stands in front of a car crash.
REPORTER Blah blah blah
BACK TO SCENE
Mark turns and takes a sip of wine.
Is the BACK TO SCENE needed? Or do I have to write INT. RESTAURANT again when Mark stops watching the tv? Or maybe it isn´t neccessary to write anyting at all?
It really depends on the secondary heading. The one you specify would not require a back to scene because all you're doing is bringing focus to something inside the location and haven't left it. Once you mention Mark again, we get the idea that we're no longer staring at the TV. This type of heading is allowable in spec scripts since it doesn't interrupt the flow of the story using anything "camera-ish," but you have to make sure it is used correctly. The way you have it shows the SCREEN heading ending a sentence, which is incorrect. A secondary heading can begin a sentence, but cannot end one. Yeah, weird, but it would work something like this (combining your original with Bert's suggestion to create allowable combo).
Mark looks at the
TELEVISION SCREEN
where a REPORTER stands in front of a car crash.
All you're doing is separating the sentence to bring things out. Mark turns from there and the story continues. BACK TO SCENE is used for INSERTS, MONTAGES, FLASHBACKS, and things of that nature. If you had said:
INSERT THE TV SCREEN
And went on about the reporter, then that would require a BACK TO SCENE. What you've done is kind of like this:
MOM
looks at Dad with her large grey eyes.
A SINGLE TEAR
flows down her cheek, dropping to the
FLOOR
where it splashes, almost inperceptibly.
Now that's an extreme, but you get the idea. It's directing the camera without telling the director how to direct the camera. Kind of a sneaky thing, but no camera angles. I mostly use subheadings such as:
INT. HOUSE
From the living room, the character walks
INTO THE KITCHEN
where he makes a sandwich. Sandwich made, the character walks
INTO THE HALLWAY
where he adjust the thermostat.
IN THE BEDROOM
the character strips naked and crawls under the single sheet. He claps twice andthe lights go out.
Thanks a bunch, Bert and George. Both of your suggestions are pretty good, and help me to get rid of this problem in the SCREEN scenes I´ve got in my script.
One more question guys. I have other scenes when I use POV´s which I can´t get rid off, because I have a character which uses thermal vision, night vision, etc, so I need the POV to show what he sees. What would you suggest in this cases? Should I use a BACK TO SCENE after describing the chacacter´s POV?
A POV is actually considered a camera direction. I conquer this by saying so-n-so watches... In the case of an unknown POV, I say "From the bushes, someone watches." Just like reading a book, you have to consider how it would be written for a reading audience. The secondary heading allows for a little bit of freedom in "directing" the script, but POV directs the camera because it's an angle. If you want to use one anyway, I believe you would do it like this:
KILLER POV
of Darla and Athena walking down the hallway. It draws close to them.
DARLA
turns to Athena and says something.
Just use a secondary heading to bring yourself out of the POV. Since you're still in the scene, you don't need to come back to it. But I would recommend using it sparingly.