SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is March 28th, 2024, 4:08am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)
One Week Challenge - Who Wrote What and Writers' Choice.


Scripts studios are posting for award consideration

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Screenwriting Discussion    Screenwriting Class  ›  How Far Should Writers go into Director Territory? Moderators: George Willson
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 3 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    How Far Should Writers go into Director Territory?  (currently 649 views)
kev
Posted: November 1st, 2011, 4:52pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Toronto, Ontario
Posts
383
Posts Per Day
0.05
Hey SS, so lately, I've been working with a script that is more-so visual than dialogue heavy. However, here is where I've been coming into some issues, wondering how far it is to go into director territory in the writing process. I can see my entire script visually and there's a few places where I've wanted to add some montage sequences. To give you guys an example, the scene in the social network where we have Mark writing a code for face mash and simultaneously there is a party going on with a group he is not included in. I figured this was more of a director's touch but I looked over the script and Aaron Sorkin had added it himself. I was wondering what everyone else's opinion on this is, because I'm not Aaron Sorkin. When dealing with more visual things to how a scene would play out on screen, like continuously cutting between two scenes for visual/metaphorical purposes not so much for the story, if that goes beyond what the writer should be doing?

Thanks,

Kev!


Logged Offline
Private Message
mcornetto
Posted: November 1st, 2011, 4:56pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



If it really works to further the story then do it.  If the story gets lost in the fact that you are doing all that cutting or you can't think of a way to present it to make it readable then tell the story another way.   While your script should be visual, your script is for reading, always remember that.  It's only after you sell it that it's produced and the director has his/her way with it.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 1 - 6
dogglebe
Posted: November 1st, 2011, 5:03pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Only go into it enough to get your point across.


Phil
Logged
e-mail Reply: 2 - 6
ReneC
Posted: November 1st, 2011, 5:30pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
Vancouver, BC
Posts
1435
Posts Per Day
0.31
Michael's advice is solid. I've heard a few comments from working screenwriters to that effect. I thought camera direction was a big no-no but in reality you don't have to stress out about it. Your script will land in front of readers first, probably an army of them, so your primary concern is to make the read interesting and as visual as possible. If it takes camera directions to do it, then do it. By the time a director reads your script it will have evolved into something unrecognizable, so don't worry about it.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 3 - 6
mcornetto
Posted: November 1st, 2011, 5:32pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



If you have never actually used camera directions - like gone to school for it or actually made a film - then you shouldn't be using camera directions in your script.   Write what you know is true in that case.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 4 - 6
kev
Posted: November 7th, 2011, 4:19pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Toronto, Ontario
Posts
383
Posts Per Day
0.05
Thanks guys, you gave me a good understanding on what I was looking for! Great advice Michael.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 6
dogglebe
Posted: November 7th, 2011, 5:15pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



The only time you should ever use a camera angle with when there is no other way to describe what you want... and you must use it extremely sparingly.  There are many ways, fortunately, to convey a camera angle.

Instead of saying:


Quoted Text
EXT.  DESERT ROAD - DAY

Wide-angle shot of a station wagon driving across a desert highway



you could say:


Quoted Text
EXT.  DESERT ROAD - DAY

A station wagon drive along a desert highway.  There is nothing but sand and cacti for miles.



Phil
Logged
e-mail Reply: 6 - 6
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Screenwriting Class  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006