SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is March 28th, 2024, 2:43pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)
One Week Challenge - Who Wrote What and Writers' Choice.


Scripts studios are posting for award consideration

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Unproduced Screenplay Discussion    Short Scripts  ›  Paranoia Moderators: bert
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 16 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    Paranoia  (currently 815 views)
Don
Posted: November 4th, 2008, 5:45pm Report to Moderator
Administrator
Administrator


So, what are you writing?

Location
Virginia
Posts
16381
Posts Per Day
1.94
Paranoia by Grant Cameron  - Short - A young newly wed couple get into a car accident and when the woman comes too, her husband is missing. 10 pages - pdf, format


Visit SimplyScripts.com for what is new on the site.

-------------
You will miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
- Wayne Gretzky
Logged Offline
Site Private Message
dogglebe
Posted: November 5th, 2008, 9:58am Report to Moderator
Guest User



This script reminds me of an old [/]Night Gallery[/i] episode.  A couple get into a car accident and the wife spends the entire episode looking for her husband.  The endings were different though.

The script left me a little confused as you throw the twist at us and then abruptly end the story.  You have to explain it a little more in order for the readers to appreciate the ending.

Also, I think you should stretch this out a little more, build some suspense as well as to convince the reader that--

--SPOILER SPACE--

--Peyton isn't delusional.  I had no problem thinking that Michael didn't exist after she was told so.  I had no reason to believe that the hospital was keeping any secrets from her--

--END SPOILER SPACE--

Hope this helps.


Phil
Logged
e-mail Reply: 1 - 5
walford
Posted: November 6th, 2008, 10:20pm Report to Moderator
New



Posts
36
Posts Per Day
0.01
I found the story a little confusing, two twists rolled into one. Most of descriptions and actions could use a rewrite. eg

“The road seems deserted, with just fields on either side of the road.
Leaves have fallen off the trees and covered the road on a beautiful, yet cold autumn day.
When a car comes into view, driving along the road and
kicking up the leaves as it passes...the only car on this
country road.”

Try something like

A lone car cuts a trail through the autumn leaves that have settled on a desolate country road. (or something like this)

Read lots more scripts, look to cut down wording. A good effort but tidy it up. Walford
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 5
d.e. jett
Posted: November 10th, 2008, 8:15pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Virginia
Posts
20
Posts Per Day
0.00
Pretty good. I agree that some of the description could be reworked. I liked it though, playing the real world against the dream world. The amnesia bit has been overdone so much, I was actually really happy you didn't go that route. The dream angle worked. Maybe some more description to counter the two worlds? For instance, maybe hint to us in some way or another that this might be a dream - without completely laying it out there. Plenty of creepy little things in a hospital to bring this out.

Also, in your descriptions you might want to remove the ellipsis. They should only be used when a character drifts off or has an unfinished thought. You don't want to indicate to your readers that YOU as a writer are drifting off into thought as you're writing description. Just a suggestion.

Overall, I thought the idea was pretty good.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 5
rjbelair
Posted: November 14th, 2008, 5:25pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Boston Area
Posts
43
Posts Per Day
0.01
This is an interesting premise, but I feel that you can develop it more and strengthen the story in some areas.  Firstly, the title is “Paranoia” but we don’t really see this play out as much as I expected.  I never actually believed that anyone was “out to get” Peyton, I bought into the idea that Michael was her delusion.  If she could have provided some evidence that there really is a Michael (or tried to), and Rachel or the doctors denied the proof, then I wouldn’t know what was real and what wasn’t.  For example, if Peyton showed her sister her wedding ring, and her sister explains is away by saying “you could have got that at any pawn shop.”  You need to seed little elements like this into the mix to keep us guessing whether Peyton is delusional, or if there is some conspiracy afoot to justify the paranoia.

I was confused at the end, but I was able to sort it out after a few moments.  I don’t want to step on your toes here, but I think you have an opportunity to up the drama and make this a lot clearer.  How about if when Peyton shoots herself, you cut to her in the hospital bed – her eyes snap open, as if suddenly awakening from a nightmare.  Then we hear the long beep of the heart monitor as it flatlines.  The doctor closes her eyes and pulls the sheet over her head, then we see Michael.  Just an idea...

I found the writing to be very rough in spots.  Try to be as economical and visual as you can.  There are several places where you repeat information, and begin descriptions with information that is in the scene heading.  For example, on page 1, second scene heading is, “INT. CAR” then you start the descriptions with “In the car.”  I’ll use the rest of this description block as an example of how you should be thinking about tightening things up.

In the car, MICHAEL KELLY (25) sits behind the wheel and keeps his eyes on the road while his passenger, PEYTON KELLY (24) sits comfortably with her feet up on the dashboard, looking at a map.

> “In the car” is unnecessary.
> “sits behind the wheel” sounds like they’re parked.  “Sits” isn’t needed because he can’t be standing or lying behind the wheel.  
> “keeps his eyes on the road” isn’t needed (as it would be assumed unless you indicate otherwise).  Besides, this is immediately countered by him glancing at Peyton in the next action block.  Try not to direct the actor’s eyes unless you absolutely have to.
> “his passenger” is not needed and makes Peyton sound more like a cab fare than a new wife.
> “sits comfortably” is not needed, her feet being up already implies that she’s comfortable.
> Replace all this mundane business with touches that tell us something more.

MICHEAL KELLY (25) drums lightly on the steering wheel as he drives.  Next to him, PEYTON KELLY (24) lounges with her feet up on the dashboard frowning at a map.

There are hundreds of different ways you could go with this simple little piece of description, but think about what opportunities there are to reveal character and mood with as little clutter as possible.  Take a look at each of your description blocks with the same approach and see where you can cut what isn’t needed, then sculpt the language to show exactly what you’re seeing in your mind’s eye in the simplest way possible.

Format/Mechanical Notes:
Pg. 1: You say there are “just fields” on either side of the road, but then you say there are trees (and fallen leaves).  Which is it?
Pg. 3: “car lays” should be “car lies”
Pg. 3: “...two hands emerge...attached to the body of Peyton...” – I know what you’re going for here, but this line sounds very awkward.
Pg. 3: “She starts to look around...” – Does she only start to look around, or does she actually look around?  Try to only use “starts” and “begins” if the action is going to be interrupted.
Pg. 3: “...scanning the area with her eyes...” – what else is she going to use to scan the area?  Her tri-corder?  Just “She scans the area” works fine.
Pg. 4: “its Rachel” should be “it’s Rachel”
Pg. 4: Rachel says “I’m your sister” without any indication that Peyton doesn’t recognize her.  In fact, Peyton asking “why are you here?” seems to show that she knows who Rachel is.  And if Rachel is aware she’s in a hospital, is this the right question?  Maybe “How did you get here so quick?” or something along those lines might add to the weirdness if her sister lives far away and the accident just happened.
Pg. 5: “next to a Psychologist” should be “next to a PSYCHOLOGIST” (his/her first appearance).
Pg. 6: “tears flowing from her face” sounds odd, like tears are coming out of her skin.  Maybe “tears flowing down her face”?
Pg. 6: Slight problem here with the files in that we don’t know what Peyton’s last name is, or is supposed to be.  So when she rifles through the K’s we have no idea what she’s looking for.  When she pulls the Brown file, we have no idea that’s her maiden name.
Pg. 6: “starts looking at it” should be “looks at it”
Pg. 7: “...fear filling her entire body” is an unfilmable.
Pg. 9: “were to severe” should be “were too severe”

With some careful work on the description blocks you can make this flow much smoother and keep us in the story better.  Try to include some more incongruities to support the paranoia to keep us guessing.  This has a great deal of potential for pit-of-the-stomach creepiness – what’s scarier than having everyone tell you you’re crazy, when you know you aren’t... or are you?

Good luck!



Why do things that only happen to stupid people keep happening to me?

My Scriptography
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 4 - 5
rshanneman
Posted: November 16th, 2008, 12:33am Report to Moderator
New



Location
Muncie, Indiana
Posts
4
Posts Per Day
0.00
I enjoyed this script, it was pretty mind blowing but I agree with rjbelair here.  those corrections would make this already good script 100% better
Logged Offline
Private Message AIM Reply: 5 - 5
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Short Scripts  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006