Print Topic

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board  /   General Chat  /  Tip for writing for low budget
Posted by: Scar Tissue Films, May 6th, 2010, 9:21am
This is an email I got sent from the Raindance festival...they send out a weekly notice with advice for filmmakers and such...I thought it might be useful for those looking to write low budget stuff.


Quoted Text
As a writer you are usually freed from financial constraints. All you need to work are a pen and paper (or a computer if you want to get really fancy) and away you go. But when it comes time for someone else to turn your script into some moving images with a cotemperaneous soundtrack money is going to have to be spent. Surprisingly, just how much of it has to be spent is up to you. Budget comes from the script – action scenes, animals etc all cost money and if they’re vital to the story then your script is automatically going to be viewed as a higher budget production.

So, if your looking for an indie screen credit, or are writing a script to direct or produce yourself you might want to bear in mind how much those little words on the page are actually going to cost on the screen. Take a look at the list below and try to avoid using all of them in the script or your going to end up with a budget to rival Avatar’s.


Actors

More speaking parts means more actors, which means more pay, or at least more free lunches. It also means more casting, more rehearsal time more paperwork and more people to organise – none of which is going to particularly thrill the producer. Keep the number of speaking parts down to a minimum. If necessary, combine some of your more minor characters so that they can be confidante, exposition requester and cannon fodder instead of having three people playing the three roles.

Crowd scenes are obviously going to be a nightmare. There’s no way you can film guerrilla style in a real crowd – everyone’s going to be looking down the lens. Creating a crowd involves 10s or 100s of extras and therefore some sort of open casting process, group rehearsal and again, they’re all going to need feeding.

Locations
When possible, use free or cheap locations. If you’re writing for a specific project (your own, or a commissioned one) and you know of free locations that you can use, write them into the script. Ask friends about garages, or houses they have in the countryside. If you’re writing on spec at least try to write cheap locations – you’re not Hitchcock, it’s going to cost a bomb to get access to Mt. Rushmore. Local and independent shops/cafes etc are often amenable to independent film shoots. If in doubt, write generic and tell the producer you can change that setting to whatever they have available (NB, don’t generally write generic locations, just in this situation).

Use locations repeatedly. If you set one scene in the garage, consider setting a few more there. New locations need scouting, paying for and time to set up lights etc for the scene. Use a few locations repeatedly and the director will be able to shoot all those scenes on the same day, saving a lot of time (and therefore money).

If an expensive location (like a hospital, for example) is necessary try and make it easier for the director and producer to make it work. Don’t, for example, have your characters talking in A&E with ambulances and wounded people all over the place. Instead establish it’s a hospital with a brief exterior shot (that might be gettable without permission, not that we’re advocating that) and then move to an interior like a doctor’s office that will be easy to set up somewhere else.

Period drama and uniforms

The problems here should be obvious. Period costume and set dressing is going to be hard to get hold of and quite expensive. Likewise modern uniforms and officially marked vehicles etc might be difficult to procure.

Ext. night, dawn and dusk
Shooting outside at night is hard and expensive. Yes, it can be done, and yes it can add great atmosphere but don’t just throw it into your script on a whim. Likewise dawn and dusk are very hard to capture and there will be only a very limited window for shooting in. If a night scene is necessary it might be worth writing it with only available light (lamps, car lights etc) rather than moonlight (which usually involves a crane and expensive lighting equipment). Check out Blood Simple for some great available light shot scenes that really rely on the writing.

Weather
Just like difficult light conditions, creating weather on demand can be expensive and, especially in this country, you can’t rely on it being sunny in summer or snowy in winter. Rain, snow, sandstorms, tornados or whatever else you dream up – are they necessary to the story? Can you make your metaphor in some other way? Otherwise your going to cost the production a ton in rain wands, potato flakes and fans.

Heavy make up
Requires a make-up artist with skill and experience and they don’t usually work for free. It is also time consuming and a nightmare for continuity.

Rights
Music rights, first and foremost, are very expensive. Do not specify a particular track unless you know you already have the rights to it. Specifying a genre is fine – let the music department (or producer/director on a tiny indie film more like) choose something then within their budget. Some music is in the public domain but you will need to check that rights to a specific recording of it are not held by labels.
          
Likewise brands and logos will all need expensive and convoluted clearance. One way around this is to make up your own brand (Big Kahuna burger anyone?) or you could take the more understandable route of being a little generic and non-specific. One point to note here is that Ext. shots on high streets will capture a lot of logos in shop windows (and the shops themselves) so that might be something you want to avoid.

Children and animals
Even if they’re working for free (and they’re much less likely too because their parents are managing them), children are still a big hassle for a production. Not only do they need constant supervision (Health and Safety and Morality) they can also only work a limited number of hours everyday. Add to that a lot of form-filling, holiday-scheduling and acting coaching and they can be quite a burden.
            
Animals, needless to say, can be very difficult to work with on set. They take up a lot of time and you need wranglers etc to look after them and get the required performances. This all costs money.

Stunts and fight scenes
If they’re even medium sized they’re probably going to require stunt-coordinators and maybe doubles. If you’ve written in firearms then a firearms officer will be required on set, and explosions require all that and more. Even if it’s a small stunt it’s going to require a lot of rehearsal and will have to be shot from various angles all of which will take up a lot of time and therefore money. Plus editing a fight scene is massively time consuming.
Scenes of sex and nudity are similar to fight scenes, surprisingly. They limit the casting pool to those willing (or able, for fight scenes) to do it. They require closed sets (less crew, harder job for those remaining) and rehearsal to get right and again, editing them is a nightmare. Try to keep your fights, stunts and sex simple, and where possible, use techniques like cutting away to the result of the scene rather than writing the scene itself

Now most or all of these are get-aroundable, especially if you can find someone with the know-how or the equipment willing to work for free. But every solution will take time, effort and a lot of organisation and that in itself will have hidden monetary costs (lunch etc). If they’re crucial to the story then one or two of these elements shouldn’t be a problem. Include too many, however, and most sensible indie producers simply won’t want to make your film



Not rocket science most of it...although the stuff on night time stuff using available light was quite intersting I thought.
Posted by: dogglebe (Guest), May 6th, 2010, 9:49am; Reply: 1

Quoted Text
Animals, needless to say, can be very difficult to work with on set. They take up a lot of time and you need wranglers etc to look after them and get the required performances. This all costs money.


You learned this one the hard way, didn't you?


Phil
Posted by: Scar Tissue Films, May 6th, 2010, 10:36am; Reply: 2

Quoted from dogglebe


You learned this one the hard way, didn't you?


Phil


:P

I did indeed, I did indeed.
Posted by: dogglebe (Guest), May 6th, 2010, 3:45pm; Reply: 3
So, based on your original post, I shouldn't write any shorts where trained dogs fly helicopters in Saint Patrick's Cathedral, then?


Phil
Posted by: Scar Tissue Films, May 6th, 2010, 3:54pm; Reply: 4
I don't know to be honest. I reckon that advice is a touch outdated with modern technology.

Some people can make some extraordinary stuff with a painted green wall and an illegally downloaded copy of after effects.

Maybe I shoudln't have even posted it. :)
Posted by: dogglebe (Guest), May 6th, 2010, 6:34pm; Reply: 5
I think it was good advice.  As writers, we should take cost into account when we write something.  Not everyone has access to the technology for green wall s/f. Some people have to do it old school.

And then there's this:




Phil
Posted by: mcornetto (Guest), May 6th, 2010, 6:41pm; Reply: 6
Phil,

That film was a lot more work than you think.

No one is going to want to go to that kind of trouble for something someone else writes unless they are paid to do it.
Posted by: dogglebe (Guest), May 6th, 2010, 6:48pm; Reply: 7
I remember hearing that it wasn't that much to do.  It was a s/f job.


Phil
Posted by: mcornetto (Guest), May 6th, 2010, 7:29pm; Reply: 8
405 was created by Bruce Branit and Jeremy Hunt  using only consumer level computers, off-the-shelf software, and their imaginative talents. This short film was shot in two days on location on the busy I-405 freeway in Los Angeles and Orange County. But it really came to be only after three more months of hard work using computer graphics.

http://www.405themovie.com/makingofHome.asp
Posted by: dogglebe (Guest), May 6th, 2010, 7:53pm; Reply: 9
There ya go.


Phil
Posted by: jwent6688, May 6th, 2010, 10:29pm; Reply: 10
Phil, that was a pretty impressive short film IMO. I'd try to do a little better if your gonna try to rip on some independents. Stick to the Sci-Fi channel...
Posted by: dogglebe (Guest), May 7th, 2010, 5:34am; Reply: 11
I thought this was a very good short, too.  It shows what small group of filmmakers can do.


Phil
Print page generated: May 15th, 2024, 3:36am