We should see if we can find the original script, or as close as we can get, before the show.

Quoted from leitskev Too bad the cinemas didn't replay things like this once in a while.

Repertory theaters do that very thing.
But you're only likely to find them in major cities.

We have The New Beverly Cinema here in L.A.
http://www.newbevcinema.com/
And we have "guest programmers" throughout the year...
Folks like Tarantino, Kevin Smith, Seth Green and Edgar Wright.
And it's pretty common to see actors and crew show up for Q&A's.

Here's a list of repertory theaters in the country...
http://reverseshot.com/theaters

Regards,
E.D.

I always thought it was pretty apparent, at least in the director's cut, that Deckard was a replicant. It's not like Inception's top. There's pretty substantial evidence that this is the case.

Of course, there's less evidence in the theatrical version and depending on how one feels about a director's vision being the "correct" one, I can see how someone might argue the opposite. That is to say one could argue Ridley Scott's cut need not be recognized.

I'll say yes though.

Quoted from James McClung It's not like Inception's top. There's pretty substantial evidence that this is the case.

But, that's the whole point of the end of "Inception".

Don't you remember when Ellen Page wants to hold JGL's loaded die? He says she can't because that would defeat the purpose.

The top DiCaprio uses wasn't his. It was Marion Cotillard's. So, he can't use it to tell whether it's reality or not, but it doesn't matter.

How about the riddle? "You're waiting for a train. A train that'll take you far away. You know where you think this train might take you, but you can't know for sure. But, it doesn't matter. Now, tell me why?" "Because you'll be together."

That's the point of the end. He doesn't care whether it's reality anymore. He's just happy to have the kids.

I derailed this enough. Sorry. Please proceed with more Blade Runner awesomeness.