All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Typos are the missed free throws of screenwriting; For every one typo it's like a point is shaved away at your total score.
This script is littered with typos. They didn't really make it hard to read, but they were EVERYWHERE, including in the logline.
The story wasn't that bad but it wasn't anything over the top either. With 40 selections I think this one will be quickly forgotten. Also the line "...an attractive twenty year old accidentally, on purpose, bumps into her." Huh?
I promised to try and be nice...or at least not be a cock in my comments. Will I be able to? This opening script is going to really test me.
There are so many problems with the writing itself on display here, that I actually have to wonder if the mistakes were done on purpose, as in a joke. Since I don't know, I'll have to assume this is a serious attempt...so, I'll throw out some examples.
"FADE INTO:" - "FADE IN:"
SLUGS should be all CAPPED, all the time. There are many other formatting issues with your SLUGS as well.
Your use of passive verbiage is annoying and constant.
Your character descriptions are poorly done.
Many, many typos, misspellings, incorrect use of words, awkward phrasing, poor grammar, you name it, it's littered in here.
Dialogue is so on the nose and cheesy, it almost comes off as if it's an intentional joke.
No need for all the "CONTINUED"'s at the top and bottom of every page. GET RID OF THEM!
On the positive side now, taken as a complete joke, this kind of works for me and the ending is pretty good. I actually chuckled a bit.
So, in summary, if this is written as poorly as possible on purpose to be funny, it is. If the writing is a serious attempt, then it needs MAJOR, MAJOR work.
This could've been a good concept, but aside from the the obvious typos, what lacked the most (for me) was a better twist. Need to put more thought into it. You nailed the theme, but missed the genre. No drama.
You've already got some feedback on the errors, and I don't really care about them anyway.
You've got a good twist ending, which allowed you to gain some ground you lost where the story hovered with no real conflict. This is about a contest, and that contest is supposed to flag the differences in life view - it's also an amusing visual - but you decide to go the route of a conversation, which sort of satisfies the theme, but not really. This is more a story about deceit and doing what it takes to get the girl, but there's nothing inherently wrong with its focus on theme. I just think the idea is better than the execution.
I didn't like any of the characters -- which is not the same as not caring about the characters... at least a reaction registered. As far as the ending goes, I guess they all got what they deserved.
Didn't like this one at all. Phrases like "barbaric" and "male stupidity" paint the vegan as a cliche right off the bat. I also don't by that her conversation with Bryan wouldn't have taken place earlier. Also, knowing Veronica's lifestyle, why would Bryan even enter the contest? Is he just a complete douchebag or what? If so, why does Veronica even put up with him. Didn't care for Mark either. Had no swagger which I suppose was supposed to be the case and he brought nothing interesting to the conversation. No one did. By the numbers, this one and more than a tad unrealistic. That's about it.
I nearly put the script down because of all the typos; they were very distracting. Hopefully, after the OWC, the author can work on it and repost the script.
I thought the story, character and dialog were all good. Things flood naturally. And the ending had a nice twist. I would, maybe, change Mark's name to something a little more memorable.
Veronica's disgust sounded good at first, when it looked like she was referring to the contest itself. It then sounds fake when you notice it refers to eating animals.
You definitely need to invest in some good screenwriting software. Your format, spelling, syntax and punctuation were all over the map. For a six page script, this was really jam packed with mistakes. This one in particular caught my eye:
"Veronica looks back to see Bryan with mustered all over him"
Yikes.
I think you actually had a decent concept here, but the execution just fell apart.
Three people at an meat eating contest one who happens to be a vegan. Not likely any one could do that without a vegan rant or meltdown. Kinda wish you had - the girl was too accomodating. Nothing dramatic just conversation. Points off for many typos and missed opportunity for drama.
The story was a bit "one note" in my opinion. Once you establish that Veronica is a vegan who hates meat eaters, you should focus on something else to drive the story.
Her rant against carnivores felt a bit repetitive.
Also, she was a bit too quick to leave with a man she didn't even know. This ain't a porn movie man!
I don't think the conversation route works here because there isn't too much tension going on. Minimal conflict = two talking heads. I'm actually more interested in the eating competition.
Story is very thin as well. Every story plot is almost in dialogue form. But I'll give you that the ending is a nice visual twist.
Overall, the characters and story aren't compelling with tons of technical mistakes.
Sorry.
FEATURE:
Memwipe - Sci-Fi, Action, Thriller (114 pages) - In a world where memories can be erased by request, a Memory Erasing Specialist desperately searches for the culprit when his wife becomes a target for erasure -- with his former colleagues hot on his trail.