Happy birthday to DJS too!  Nice job with this OWC!

re: Debbie Gibson - I have a buddy who has made three films (Wrote, Produced, Directed). One of them has Debbie Gibson in a cameo!

Quoted from TimWestland re: Debbie Gibson - I have a buddy who has made three films (Wrote, Produced, Directed). One of them has Debbie Gibson in a cameo!

  Nice.  She's absolutely hilarious in one of those Mega Shark Asylum shitflicks.

A couple of years back during an OWC, Don started putting asterisks next to scripts where the author had been reviewing other scripts - I think it was after a few days of them being up on the boards.

Then we were able to choose if we would read a script by someone who hadnt got involved or acknowledged the thread.  This was a good idea which combatted the anonymous aspect too.

Just a thought but it was disgraceful last OWC that perps didn't read any others especially one who was voted equal first.

Sharks are released. Pool is open.

30?  Gees Louise.  I'll read as many as I can.  Kinda crunched for time at the minute.  

Didn't enter myself, I tried, but there were only so many things I could do with a time traveling cyborg shark from the year 2458 landing in the Pirate Era.  

And since it was the only idea that spawned in my crammed noggin I doubt the thought of a cyborg shark capable of shooting lasers from its eyes could be matched by a bunch of scallywags drunk on rum.

Any-who... congrats to all that entered.  I'll check them out!

Quoted from stevie A couple of years back during an OWC, Don started putting asterisks next to scripts where the author had been reviewing other scripts - I think it was after a few days of them being up on the boards.

Understandable principle utility.

However, due to my personal approach, which I acknowledge is VERY nonstandard, of first reviewing all submissions (and you guys can bank I will), going back to sometimes modify opinions & observations, then posting all results simultaneously - the utility you've suggest will make it unfairly appear as if "this fecking bastard here" isn't contributing.

I suppose I could pop in a qualitative comment "Reviewed & assessed." on each submission thread after I've read them, and you guys will have to sweat bullets and trust that after I've read them all I'll post a quantified review with the fullest practical perspective I can (like it or not).

Hopefully that will keep my submission off the naughty list, if Don chooses to go this route (looks like a lot of hassle to influence a few penile-encephaly sufferers).

I've got the history.
I'll have a late start to next week's reviews.
(Kinda counting on at least two or three of these to have fecal format so that I can ditch 'em on page one.)
You guys will have to just trust me.

Quoted from RayW Understandable principle utility. However, due to my personal approach, which I acknowledge is VERY nonstandard, of first reviewing all submissions (and you guys can bank I will), going back to sometimes modify opinions & observations, then posting all results simultaneously - the utility you've suggest will make it unfairly appear as if "this fecking bastard here" isn't contributing. I suppose I could pop in a qualitative comment "Reviewed & assessed." on each submission thread after I've read them, and you guys will have to trust that after I've read them all I'll post a quantified review with the fullest practical perspective I can (like I or not). Hopefully that will keep my submission off the naughty list, if Don chooses to go this route (looks like a lot of hassle to influence a few penile-encephaly sufferers). I've got the history. I'll have a late start to next week's reviews. (Kinda counting on at least two or three of these to have fecal format so that I can ditch 'em on page one.) You guys will have to just trust me.

Yeah all good points Ray

Look without sounding anal about it, but we get annoyed, is all. That's why I don't really like the anon but even though it's a tradition.

If you can see that certain perps are doing ZERO reading then we can give their work ZERO reads

Simple

Agree with my mate, Stevie and Ray.

Something should be done so the A-Hols who don't participate don't get the reads either...as they don't deserve them.

I'll gte on these ASAP, but I'm doing ribs with my Lochie and pounding down liquor like it's 1983 or somewhere around that era.  

If you enter, then you should read. I went out of my way to read all of the last entries. I felt obligated as I had entered. Especially if you post here regularly. But that's just my standards. It's about respect.

In fact I even read a few twice after feeling that I may have unfairly judged them due to tiredness or whatever else may have been bugging me at the time.

I'm a little late to the party here. 30 scripts? Good work, but with about a week to read them all that's about four a day - might have to keep my reviews nice & short - hope I get through them & good luck to every one

So that I don't lose track of what I've read I think I'll make a note here:

The Nauticca Knot
Lord Laughs at the Wicked
The Ordeal
Loyalty
Shark Tale
The Shark Doctor
*Terror at Sea

I will resume reading after I do my workout lol

I won't be reading or reviewing any pissers or comedy ones that shouldn't be there.

Sorry to be anal,about the comedy thing but this would ve been a great theme to do a really good comedy script.

But it wasn't allowed so no reads of them from me lol

Quoted from stevie ... I won't be reading or reviewing any pissers or comedy ones that shouldn't be there...

And, we all know that's just cause you're all bitter and twisted.  
'No Soup For You!'

Quoted from LC And, we all know that's just cause you're all bitter and twisted.   'No Soup For You!'

The delicious irony Lib, is that I 'invented' the pisstake moniker for these! Lol