SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is March 28th, 2024, 2:37pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)
One Week Challenge - Who Wrote What and Writers' Choice.


Scripts studios are posting for award consideration

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    One Week Challenge    October 2012 One Week Challenge  ›  The Tool of Morality - 10/12 OWC
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

 Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    The Tool of Morality - 10/12 OWC  (currently 7045 views)
Don
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 7:13pm Report to Moderator
Administrator
Administrator


So, what are you writing?

Location
Virginia
Posts
16381
Posts Per Day
1.94
The Tool of Morality by Anonymous James - Short - An strange couple takes refuge one night from a hurricane in a run down motel where decisions about morality create a constant flow of choices between good or evil and the survival of humanity. - pdf, format


Visit SimplyScripts.com for what is new on the site.

-------------
You will miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
- Wayne Gretzky
Logged Offline
Site Private Message
kingcooky555
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 7:39pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
New York
Posts
221
Posts Per Day
0.05
If NBK were about two philosophers....

I think I missed the supernatural part here. The low budget went out the window with the saw cutting, unless there's a way to do that cheaply?

There are some funny parts. I think some are meant to be symbolic. It's basically two heads talking to each other with some "interesting" gore going on in the background.

I'm not sure if this story meets all the criteria though. Okay effort, and not sure if this can be filmed without getting a NC17 rating.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 1 - 62
Dreamscale
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 8:50pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



I probably shouldn't even comment on this trash.

IMO, this is downright appalling and disgusting.

If you thnk this is entertainment or that anyone will be netertained by it, you've got issues...serious issues.

On the page, it's nothing but ridiculous rants and "discussions" on God nknows what, while X rated violence and beyond X rated acts of sex and depravity take place.

And you want to put this to film?  Unreal.

I'm actually surprised The Don posted this.

Finally, this garbage does not in any way meet the challenge guidelines.

I'll throw out a grade here - F - for FUCKED!

Logged
e-mail Reply: 2 - 62
greg
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 9:01pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Oh Hi

Location
San Diego, California
Posts
1680
Posts Per Day
0.24
Tried way too hard to get a reaction and as a result I have no reaction.

Nice try.

Greg


Be excellent to each other
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 62
danbotha
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 9:16pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Wellington, New Zealand
Posts
700
Posts Per Day
0.16
Yeah, I stopped reading this on page 3. There didn't seem to be much going on other than two people talking while having sex.

Nothing in this one, sorry.

Dan


Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 62
Mr. Blonde
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 9:35pm Report to Moderator
Administrator


What good are choices if they're all bad?

Location
Nowhere special.
Posts
3064
Posts Per Day
0.57
Well, Kingcooky seemed to think they were Mickey and Mallory-esque whereas I see them being a psychotic combination of two of Brad Pitt's roles; Jeffrey Goines (Twelve Monkeys) and Tyler Durden (Fight Club).

Anyway, I didn't see much of a story here and any who talks in rants/diatribes like that, usually has breaks or shifts thoughts mid-sentence. I thought they both spoke way too clear and, in that regard, it felt too forced.

Also, I would have liked to have known where the three tied up people came from. I mean, unless it was their apartment (although it doesn't seem like it), I don't know how they got them up there.

Anyway, flawed logic and important unanswered questions and a serious lack of an actual story (granted, this looks like it was written by a regular) drops the score down. I'd say emply some of those fixes and you'll have something, at least, more interesting, even though the likelihood of this being filmed is minimal.

D-.

P.S. Make your dialogue more interesting, while you're at it. Big words and a long rant will only get you so far (I'm looking at you "The Matrix Reloaded").


Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 62
Gage
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 10:51pm Report to Moderator
New



Posts
221
Posts Per Day
0.05
Well, this definitely goes in the "what the hell did I just read" category.  Sorry, but I didn't find much worth in this one.  Needlessly shocking and overly philosophical.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 62
Reef Dreamer
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 3:53am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Part time writer

Location
The Island of Jersey
Posts
2612
Posts Per Day
0.57
Yup you get a WTF from me.

Kind of reminded me of Candide, you know the belief that we are In the best of all possible worlds whilst real shit goes on.

The contrast between what is said and want is done doesn't need to be so heavy handed. And yes, this meant to be for film so it goes too far.

Whilst if we analysed every world there could be some running discourse and meaning, you know what, it's not great viewing. More of an academic paper with brutal killing thrown in for fun.

Not for me.


My scripts  HERE

The Elevator Most Belonging To Alice - Semi Final Bluecat, Runner Up Nashville
Inner Journey - Page Awards Finalist - Bluecat semi final
Grieving Spell - winner - London Film Awards.  Third - Honolulu
Ultimate Weapon - Fresh Voices - second place
IMDb link... http://www.imdb.com/name/nm7062725/?ref_=tt_ov_wr
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 62
mcornetto
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 4:12am Report to Moderator
Guest User



I thought this was quite good.  Someone got all arty with it and I think actually nailed it (It was kind of like an Oliver Stone/David Lynch take on the requirements).  

I didn't really like the ending, I'm not sure it had the historical aspect and I don't think it truly qualifies as microbudget (mostly because of the head wound)  but I think it has a sort of intelligence and oddness about it that makes it both unique and fascinating.  

Good work.    

Revision History (1 edits)
mcornetto  -  October 21st, 2012, 4:25am
Logged
e-mail Reply: 8 - 62
stevie
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 4:35am Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Down Under
Posts
3441
Posts Per Day
0.61
Reminded me of American Psycho...the book anyway( have never seen the film).

The writing style was good but the subject matter, though meant as black comedy, sorta has polarised the readers.



Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 62
LC
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 5:33am Report to Moderator
Administrator



Location
The Great Southern Land
Posts
7581
Posts Per Day
1.34
You chose to split your slugs up for Head of the Bed and Foot of the Bed?!

I think you really have to be quite a brilliant writer for something like this to succeed.

Imho, this needed inspired debate and wit in the dialogue, but I didn't get any of that.

I just got bored with the dialogue, sorry to say.

A real talking head piece. Pun intended.

Another quite unique take on the challenge, I'll say that much.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 62
jwent6688
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 7:44am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Wherever I go, there Jwent.

Posts
1858
Posts Per Day
0.33
Someone certainly has an issue with religion. I have no problem with that, but you failed big time to get any point across because this story was just plain boring. Am glad I read to the end just to find juggalo Joe gets his head blown off.

Good job entering the owc.

James


Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 62
alffy
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 8:37am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
The bleak North East, England
Posts
2187
Posts Per Day
0.34
This one seems to be causing a bit of a shit storm so I might as well see what's it all about...

Straight away I see some format errors; strange slugs and redundant description.

Jeans or shorts?  Oh, the woman wears shorts.  How was I to know as she was in bed?

If Regina can carry on her conversation, he's doing it bad.  He might as well give up and wash his face lol.  

Okay now I'm confused, are we in the same Motel room?  Where did these people come from?

So there's plenty of controversial stuff in here.  Religion, race and murder to name a few.  The main problem is that the story is poor.  What the hell is it about...really.  Things aren't explained well enough and got quite bored trudging through the over complicated dialogue.

Sorry but this wasn't for me.


Check out my scripts...if you want to, no pressure.

You can find my scripts here
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 62
CoopBazinga
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 8:52am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
Perth, Australia
Posts
1175
Posts Per Day
0.26
I think this will be one of the dullest of all entries. I should taken more notice of the "attention" message about this story containing language. It had that in abundance.

And that's even with random people getting cut up without remorse like any normal butcher cutting off a tender piece of rump steak for a customer on a Saturday afternoon.

I'll give you this - the characters were odd and definitely well-spoken but my God was the dialogue boring here. This read like two politicians going at it about a subject I don't care about on "Question Time"  I'm not your targeted audience obviously because this was far from entertaining IMO.

As for the other criteria, like decisions between good and evil, supernatural past etc. I didn't see it but to be honest I didn't understand half of what they were talking about so maybe it was there but hidden within the lacklustre dialogue. Low budget, don't think so... The gallons of fake blood needed would cost a bomb.

The story... Well again a little lost on it but I'll have a stab. They were calling them "looters" and then there was the police sirens going past which I thought might have some relevance? Maybe these unlucky people were robbing some place and these two psycho Bonnie and Clyde types decided to give them some capital punishment?

On the other hand, maybe this guy just kills random women and decides to strip them and perform sexual acts because he's mad? That seems more logical I guess.

The writing in itself isn't bad and this is definitely from a member of boards, I didn't care much for the slugs and there was the usual missing words which made for awkward sentences. For a weeks work though, pretty good.

But the story and idea just isn't for me at all, I'm afraid to say... I was literally bored senseless.

Congrats on completing the OWC.

Steve
Logged
Private Message Reply: 13 - 62
LC
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 8:54am Report to Moderator
Administrator



Location
The Great Southern Land
Posts
7581
Posts Per Day
1.34

Quoted from alffy
If Regina can carry on her conversation, he's doing it bad.  He might as well give up and wash his face lol.

Very funny comment




Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 62
DarrenJamesSeeley
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 10:29am Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Michigan.USA
Posts
1522
Posts Per Day
0.31
As I read this, it is exactly 12 hours and 15 minutes since I caught Re-Animator on cable. I'm also a fan of David Lynch -Wild At Heart is my favorite -and David Cronernberg. For some strange reason I watched all three Hostels and all the Saws. It's also been a long night.

Gore doesn't bug me too much. Even I get a little rough sometimes. But I know where to draw the line. I also know that I don't throw in an abracadabra moment and have a roomful of bound and gagged hostages come out from nowhere. (or should I say 'abracadaver'?)

So, after reading this, I asked myself three questions.

1 - If this were filmed as a short, your actors are working for almonds. Not only to they have to recite banal dialog, but they have to show T&A, and act this out. It'll cost you a pretty penny.

2 - I don't know if you are a big fan of early Nicolas Roeg or the late Ken Russell, but I wonder if you were into Kenneth Anger.

3- I wasn't aware snuff required scripts,

Y'know, there's not much holding this together except for shock value. I would have liked this more if Rthe characters simply shut up, the more they talked the worse it got for me.

On a tech note, there is a serious issue with gender-pronoun agreement (Regina says something, next action line starts with 'He' and so on)


"I know you want to work for Mo Fuzz. And Mo Fuzz wants you to. But first, I'm going to need to you do something for me... on spec." - Mo Fuzz, Tapeheads, 1988
my scripts on ss : http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1095531482/s-45/#num48
The Art!http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-knowyou/m-1190561532/s-105/#num106
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 15 - 62
mmmarnie
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 12:09pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Posts
1085
Posts Per Day
0.22
My eyes glazed over at page 4.  The dialog got to be monotonous.  Just sounded like ranting after a while.


boop
Logged
Private Message Reply: 16 - 62
crookedowl
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 1:37pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Good news is I didn't find it a bad as some think...but then again, I didn't read very far.

Sorry. This just isn't my taste. The dialogue just reads like a long rant.

Good job finishing the OWC.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 17 - 62
Scar Tissue Films
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 2:12pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3382
Posts Per Day
0.63
I checked this out due to the controversy.

Was surprised to find very little in there. Couple of kills, a pair of tits. Nothing that's not in the tamest of horrors. Don't know what the problem is tbh.

I thought it was quite good. I enjoyed the two characters. Only problem was that there wasn't really much of a story to have them interact with.

I think there's a lot more potential here than most others have picked up on. Just my opinion.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 62
Dreamscale
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 2:44pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from Scar Tissue Films
Was surprised to find very little in there. Couple of kills, a pair of tits. Nothing that's not in the tamest of horrors. Don't know what the problem is tbh.


Rick, you read the scrpit and you don't know what the problem is?  You're saying you see this in the tamest of horror movies?  Hmmm, let's see...

We've got a character sawing women's heads off, then munching their pussies, all the while inanely conversing with the other sicko.

Please tell me which tame horror movies this takes place in, so I can be sure to never see them.

The reality is that this is easily X rated material that can really only appeal to sick twisted fucks.  What am I (or you) missing here?
Logged
e-mail Reply: 19 - 62
DV44
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 3:51pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
California
Posts
510
Posts Per Day
0.12
I might be wrong but I missed the supernatural part of the story and the dialogue lost me because I was focused too much on what Joe was doing. It was different I'll give you that but like Stevie pointed out it reminded me off American Psycho to a degree with the talking while killing aspect. Overall not bad. Congrats on finishing the OWC.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 20 - 62
Scar Tissue Films
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 5:04pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3382
Posts Per Day
0.63

Quoted from Dreamscale


Rick, you read the scrpit and you don't know what the problem is?  You're saying you see this in the tamest of horror movies?  Hmmm, let's see...

We've got a character sawing women's heads off, then munching their pussies, all the while inanely conversing with the other sicko.

Please tell me which tame horror movies this takes place in, so I can be sure to never see them.

The reality is that this is easily X rated material that can really only appeal to sick twisted fucks.  What am I (or you) missing here?


Sex is in pretty much every horror I've ever seen.

In the script all someone is doing is sticking his head between a girl's legs. On film you don't exactly have to show graphic close ups of it.

As for sawing people's heads off...again...what's the problem?

Your favourite film Hostel has far more horrific scenes in it.

The overall tone of it was quite light and comedic as well...reminded me most of House of 1000 Corpses. Just didn't see the problem.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 21 - 62
Ryan1
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 5:45pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Posts
1098
Posts Per Day
0.22
This was sort of a modern attempt at Grand Guignol.  Went for the juxtaposition of raunchy gore with bleak, fatalistic world views.  But it came off more like two characters regurgitating facts and philosophies they heard on the news and then tried to pass off as their own.

I will say, this is one of the few times where the victims in a horror script were probably praying for death to arrive quicker so they wouldn't have to listen to Joe and Regina's tripe anymore.  "Could you hurry up sawing through my vertebrae, Joe?  Regina's starting to talk about moral human happiness again."
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 22 - 62
stevie
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 9:39pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Down Under
Posts
3441
Posts Per Day
0.61

Quoted from Scar Tissue Films


Sex is in pretty much every horror I've ever seen.

In the script all someone is doing is sticking his head between a girl's legs. On film you don't exactly have to show graphic close ups of it.

As for sawing people's heads off...again...what's the problem?

Your favourite film Hostel has far more horrific scenes in it.

The overall tone of it was quite light and comedic as well...reminded me most of House of 1000 Corpses. Just didn't see the problem.


Yeah Jeff, what's the story?

Haven't you ever growled a chick then decapitated her? I thought you were Da Man?



Logged
Private Message Reply: 23 - 62
B.C.
Posted: October 23rd, 2012, 2:40pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Parts Unknown
Posts
240
Posts Per Day
0.05
Pompous Gore Porn? Hmm...

Like Rick, I don't really see it as that offensive, to be honest. I've seen worse, There's a genre of Japanese films that caters for this kind of sex/gore crossover type thing. Like most of those, this piece isn't very effective, to be honest. I tuned out of the dialogue cos' I didn't understand or care what they were harping on about.  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 24 - 62
Leon
Posted: October 23rd, 2012, 3:13pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
London, UK
Posts
58
Posts Per Day
0.01
Not sure what to think about this one.  Visually arresting.
Essentially this is a long philosophical monologue, which I generally find hard to follow, made somewhat manageable by a lot of gore.

I think i missed the point.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 25 - 62
rc1107
Posted: October 25th, 2012, 1:40pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
Youngstown
Posts
1241
Posts Per Day
0.20

Quoted from Dreamscale
this is easily X rated material that can really only appeal to sick twisted fucks.


Not all of us.  I like to think of myself as sick and a little twisted here and there, but this one didn't really appeal to me too much.

While I think this could get away with a hard R rating, (if a director takes this one, he probably wouldn't show any closeups exactly), I think the downfall of this one is the banality of the story.  (Found it funny that someone else referred to it as banal, too.  Thought that word only popped into my head as I was reading.)

Nothing really much happens and we don't know enough about the story to figure out why all these people are here anyway, and how they got there.

I also didn't see anything about something supernatural happening in the past, either.

My guess is the author just wanted to see everybody talk about how they fit in the dinosaur and the mime, which I'm happy that no one seemed to have mentioned about.  (Hopefully, my suggesting it doesn't get everybody talking about it.  :-)

- Mark


Logged
Private Message YIM Reply: 26 - 62
Eoin
Posted: October 25th, 2012, 3:04pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


just another ego maniac with low self esteem

Location
Ireland
Posts
638
Posts Per Day
0.12
Problems with the writing here from the very start:

'Lit by a cheap lamp and dim bulb, a topless woman sits beneath sheets, propped up on pillows.'

If she beneath the sheets, A is it relevant that she is topless B. how would we know, unless those sheet are see through or clinging to her very tightly


'REGINA, 30s, wears a dinosaur mask on her face as she sits motionless to watch hurricane strength rain and wind beat the window outside.'

You intro her first as a woman, then switch to Regina. Why not start with Regina, or when she removes the mask, intro her properly to us?

'A large caliber pistol rests on the worn sheets beside her.' A medium shot won't SHOW that this is a large caliber pistol and in real terms, it's not necessary to the plot of the story.

Why the separate scene heading? We don't change location, we are still in the motel room.

Okay, so dinosaur masks and mime/clown references a plenty here. Another pisser I'm guessing, or rather hoping.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 27 - 62
mcornetto
Posted: October 25th, 2012, 5:55pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Though I've calmed down a bit about this script - i.e. I think it needs a bit of work - and whether it's a pisstake or not, I think it hit upon a duality that has potential.

The author here took the requirements literally.  Rather than making a decision between good and evil - the author examines what the characters believe is good and evil - so instead they are making a decision about, or defining what is good and what is evil.  They are the tool of morality.

At least that's how I see it.  Yes, it's arty - even if it is a pisstake.  
Logged
e-mail Reply: 28 - 62
Pale Yellow
Posted: October 25th, 2012, 6:07pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Posts
2083
Posts Per Day
1.40
Artsy for sure. One of the weirdest scripts I've ever read. Not saying that in a bad way...

I did like the ending....not one of my favorites but good job on completing the owc.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 29 - 62
irish eyes
Posted: October 25th, 2012, 6:46pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group


There`s too much blood in my alcohol

Location
Upstate New York
Posts
1865
Posts Per Day
0.37
Wow, this was weird..

The dialogue was very montonous... Skip to the loo, was getting very tiring... as was all the gore...

It's just not my thing, but you can't please everybody.

You completed an OWC so good job on that

Mark


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 30 - 62
RayW
Posted: October 26th, 2012, 1:54pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36
The Tool of Morality by - An strange couple takes refuge one night from a hurricane in a run down motel where decisions about morality create a constant flow of choices between good or evil and the survival of humanity.
Brief - A psychopath defines a decision point while a sociopath saws off the heads of women.

Locations & Sets  -  Interior, motel room @ night
Actors  -  REGINA, 30s, JUGGALO JOE, 20s, bound female one, two, and three, bound male
Costumes  - Joe’s jeans + boots to be ruined, bound man’s shirt, bound women’s outfits
Props  -  dim bulb, dinosaur mask, large caliber pistol, black & white face paint, merkin, liquid stage blood, replacement sheets + pillow cases + bed spread, bindings + gags x4, small bow saw, sawn neck prosthetic x2, saw blade through neck prosthetic, decapitated head x2, neck stump on shoulders, hole in man’s back, bleeding head wound prosthetic
Audio FX  - hurricane winds, police + fire truck sirens, pistol shot
Visual FX  -  green screen removal of woman’s head, pistol flash + smoke x3
Other  -  rain & wind on exterior of window, makeup artist, thick mil plastic to protect the carpet, replacement carpet, blue + red strobe lights, oozing/bleeding apparatus
Genre & Marketability - Horror thriller
Comments  - Lot of practical prosthetics required. Replacement carpet installation and removal will be expensive, as well. Shoot lurid scenes from side and just off camera to save rating hassles. Regina’s rambling goes on a bit and she isn’t forced to make a decision. She just chooses to make one. Story relies too much on graphic elements. Good use of a single location. Script format: fine. Final word: missable story is not interesting enough to justify production expense.

$2,000 - $3,000  Lo/Hi Estimated Budget Range
/ 8.2 Screenplay Pages
= $244 - $366  Estimated Cost Per Screen Minute

Adherence to Given Criteria:
Odd but interesting character(s) - Juggalo Joe - yes, Regina - no
take refuge from a hurricane - not really
in a beat-up motel - yep
and are forced to make a choice - not really
between good or evil - yep
in order to survive the night. - not really
Each character must -
have some history involving a supernatural event in their lives - Joe does
that factors into their choice. - Regina’s choice, but not Joe’s
Genre is open. - Horror thriller
This is a micro-budget short, - yep
so no destruction of the motel, - yep
no children or animals - yep
and minimal special effects. - yep
BONUS! Story also included:
mime(s) - Does Juggalo Joe’s make up count? I think it should
dinosaur(s) - yep, Regina’s mask

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WBdeA3ZfngPz7NfJg_5DSBUFsZXkicfyNQHRc8Bg2SQ/edit



Logged
Private Message Reply: 31 - 62
RJ
Posted: October 26th, 2012, 6:12pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Australia
Posts
275
Posts Per Day
0.06
This...is...strange.

I wanted to see where this went and I'm usually into horror, etc, but when Joe started the second decapitation - ew, more than I can handle picturing, sorry. The gore was not for me in this one.

While I didn't like what was going on, the dialogue was interesting. I could understand the message there and I liked Regina.

Good effort.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 32 - 62
Felipe
Posted: October 26th, 2012, 6:37pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Los Angeles, CA
Posts
437
Posts Per Day
0.10
More like the Tool of Depravity... Am I right guys? =D

I'm kidding.

I really don't mind the sex and the gore, but it needs to be backed up by substance. I'm not sure you hit the mark for me there, but I can appreciate your clean writing style. You didn't really confuse me at all. That's always a huge plus considering how slow I am.

Thanks for submitting!


'Artist' is not a term you should use to refer to yourself. Let others, and your work, do it for you.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 33 - 62
nawazm11
Posted: October 27th, 2012, 4:39am Report to Moderator
Been Around



Posts
945
Posts Per Day
0.21
I really have to say this has to be one the dullest scripts I have ever read. Man, was this boring. Whoever the writer was, you really fucked up man. This was just incredibly stupid and made no sense. I read the dialogue multiple times but I just kept zoning out mid sentence.

Some people seem to have liked it though? Which I can't really understand. I think this began as a pisser and then morphed into some rant.

If you were to rewrite, I'd suggest making the dialogue interesting and make it flow faster.

My grade: F+.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 34 - 62
Scar Tissue Films
Posted: October 27th, 2012, 5:16am Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3382
Posts Per Day
0.63

Quoted from mcornetto
Though I've calmed down a bit about this script - i.e. I think it needs a bit of work - and whether it's a pisstake or not, I think it hit upon a duality that has potential.

The author here took the requirements literally.  Rather than making a decision between good and evil - the author examines what the characters believe is good and evil - so instead they are making a decision about, or defining what is good and what is evil.  They are the tool of morality.

At least that's how I see it.  Yes, it's arty - even if it is a pisstake.  


Good post, Michael.

This is how I feel about it, particularly the bolded part.

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 35 - 62
Andrew
Posted: October 27th, 2012, 7:07am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Posts
1791
Posts Per Day
0.32
This thread is superb marketing for the script! Couldn't resist giving it a read.

Didn't hate, didn't love it. Which is probably the worst kind of reaction for the writer. Clearly he/she wants to provoke, but like Libby, I'm not convinced the writer has the chops to pull off such audacious material. The concept of morality in - what these characters see as - an immoral world is sort of challenged, but with a sledgehammer. Not sure the issue is really with religion either, because the characters' conception of religious leaders (and they hint towards extreme leaders) is that every opinion matters - not the case, because these guys think their opinion matters. These "religious leaders" believe their version is right, therefore all others are wrong. So unless the writer is trying to shoehorn in another point, they're clearly showing the inherent hypocrisy of the two ironically "plain stupid" characters that are attempting to shape a world based on their own moral failures.

There was something of a monologue quality that, to me at least, made the characters a VO - as though they may be there in physical form, but not in spirit. As though they consider themselves floating above the extreme violence - as though this nuts and bolts action is beneath them. They clearly see themselves as moral superiors. The woman was very much in control of the relationship and proceedings, whereas the chap was a grunt carrying out her wishes. An interesting dynamic, but again, I agree with Libby about having the chops to pull off such a layered material.

The ambition of the script is what impresses me, but it's unfortunately largely unfulfilled ambition.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 36 - 62
Grandma Bear
Posted: October 27th, 2012, 8:12am Report to Moderator
Administrator



Location
The Swamp...
Posts
7961
Posts Per Day
1.36
Sorry, this will be short, on the iPad and I hate typing on it.

This one didn't do it for me, I hate to say. Although you were trying to have some philosophical discussion here, the dialogue bored me. It seemed repetitive and at only nine pages it felt longwinded to me. From production stand point, it don't see that many actors that would want to be naked and mutilated for this film on the cheap. Especially since none of the actors roles would require any acting they would want to show on their show reels as sample of their acting abilities. Just MHO of course. Also, it would probably cost good money to have realistic sawing heads off and headless corpses...I'd hate to clean up the mess too.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 37 - 62
Abe from LA
Posted: October 27th, 2012, 8:49pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Downey, California
Posts
556
Posts Per Day
0.08
While not quite my taste, I feel that we have a very good writer here, who was just going to take this challenge in a crazy direction to get it all out of his/her system.  That would be better than walking the streets armed with a tool and whacking (wacking off) heads.

I like the concept of dialogue running one way, and the action swinging the other way. The jabber got to me because the two characters talked too much.  If it were tighter, I have read deeper.

Maybe there were hints into the identity of the victims. Joe referred to them as "looters."  I was more intrigued who the victims were, what they did to deserve this fate and how they happened upon Joe and Regina.  If only some more of that would have been worked into the story — and if it's there, maybe I missed it between the cuts.  
And was there something supernatural in this story?

This isn't as bad as I expected. It's not that inspiring, but as I said earlier, I just have a feeling a really good writer took a week off, got naked with his laptop, and relieved himself.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 38 - 62
RayW
Posted: November 2nd, 2012, 10:38pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36
I remain surprised at both the contrroversy over this submission as well as the number of views it has garnered.
I promise my own views haven't jacked the count up any more than about thirty, counting the open + skip to page double count.

Um... where to start.

First, I knew many submissions would be "Tom, Dick, and Harry came to the Dingy Motel and interacted. Ooo! Ahh!"
I wanted to submit something more oblique than that.
I wanted an thick, inky, black line that ran from left to right intersected by a bloody gash of red on a downward sloping diagonal.
Regina (the queen = Rex, T.Rex) was the banal black line
Juggalo Joe (the clown = the mime) was the bloody red gash on a downward slope.

Second, Regina's babbling is a modified transcript of some controversial author's stage presentation about good vs. evil morality before an audience.
Juggalo Joe represents the insanity that both keeps up with esoteric philosophies while engaing in psychopathic indulences.

A little Sweeny Todd + Tokyo Gore Police.


Third, regarding the slugs...
Think about it:
Shot 1 - A person sits up at the head of the bed.
Shot 2 - Two legs hang off the foot end of the bed.
Umm... they ain't the same person. There's two people/bodies in the bed.
Paper. Screen. Gotta keep up, folks.
And I can tell a naked woman under the sheets from a clothed one. Maybe I have more practice at such. I dunno.


Fourth, which brings me to my personal achievement: the primary complaint was about subject material and not the format or criteria.

Angels are technically a supernatural element. Done.


FWIW, I don't care for this kind of material as entertainment for myself.
I tried to write for a specialty horror market, not for myself, not for a four-quadrant market.


I don't understand why anyone cares about the backstories of the victims or justification for murdering them.
The story was about Juggalo Joe not recognizing that his accomplice in crime Regina was experiencing a fundamental shift in her personality at that moment.
J Joe was keeping up with the conversation despite attention elsewhere but didn't know what it meant in relation to him.
WTH does that have to do with the people he's hurting? To me THAT'S the real horror! Psychopaths murder without regard for their victims.


Later, taters!


http://www.sing365.com/music/l.....B4794825695B0009331D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwSzREAiCfg




Revision History (9 edits; 1 reasons shown)
RayW  -  November 3rd, 2012, 4:21am
Logged
Private Message Reply: 39 - 62
Dreamscale
Posted: November 3rd, 2012, 11:51am Report to Moderator
Guest User



Ray, I apologize for my original comments on your script.  They may have been out of line, but I was personally offended by the content, as well as the level of hard X rated material.

Over the top gore is one thing and we've all seen it, but the way this was written (if read exactly as written) would never possibly be filmed, and to think for even a second that it could be done on a micro budget, is a bit ludicrous.

But, you redeemed yourself with your analysis of all the scripts, so I hope you accept my apology.

The thing about the Slugs, is a different story.  You can't...oh shit, I shouldn't ever say that...you shouldn't think that the top and bottom of a bed are 2 different Slugs, just like you wouldn't use different Slugs to show 4 people sitting in 4 different chairs at a dinner table. Or 3 peeps sitting on a sofa, right, middle, and left.

The top and bottom of a bed are not 2 different locations.  Hope that makes sense.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 40 - 62
jwent6688
Posted: November 3rd, 2012, 7:40pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Wherever I go, there Jwent.

Posts
1858
Posts Per Day
0.33

Quoted from RayW
I remain surprised at both the contrroversy over this submission as well as the number of views it has garnered.
I promise my own views haven't jacked the count up any more than about thirty, counting the open + skip to page double count.


Is that how you rate the success of a script? The VIEWS?

James


Logged
Private Message Reply: 41 - 62
RayW
Posted: November 3rd, 2012, 10:22pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36

Quoted from Dreamscale
Ray, I apologize for my original comments on your script.  They may have been out of line, but I was personally offended by the content, as well as the level of hard X rated material.

Over the top gore is one thing and we've all seen it, but the way this was written (if read exactly as written) would never possibly be filmed, and to think for even a second that it could be done on a micro budget, is a bit ludicrous.

But, you redeemed yourself with your analysis of all the scripts, so I hope you accept my apology.

The thing about the Slugs, is a different story.  You can't...oh shit, I shouldn't ever say that...you shouldn't think that the top and bottom of a bed are 2 different Slugs, just like you wouldn't use different Slugs to show 4 people sitting in 4 different chairs at a dinner table. Or 3 peeps sitting on a sofa, right, middle, and left.

The top and bottom of a bed are not 2 different locations.  Hope that makes sense.

Nah, there's no need for an apology.
I see the truth in your critique.

As I stated above - even I don't like the material as entertainment. But I didn't write it for me. I wrote it as a piece of horror for a specific market, bordering on a fetish market, truth be told.
You should watch a few minutes of TOKYO GORE POLICE.
Makes Cronenberg look like a silly schoolkid.
http://www.ovguide.com/tokyo-gore-police-9202a8c04000641f800000000926a0e0

Yeah, I was having a difficult time keeping the budget down.
Didn't have any good ideas without it being a talkie, and I didn't want that.
I do believe and acknowledge I went a bit far with the expense.
Just a single location + few camera placement moves + two principal actors wasn't enough.
The corpse props and protecting the motel carpet expenses did me in.
I was also VERY impressed with the way some of these other screenplays DID keep their budget down.

I'll concede directing from the script is bad form, so sue me.



Quoted from jwent6688
Is that how you rate the success of a script? The VIEWS?

Views are A measure of the interest a screenplay or story inherently generates based upon the title and/or the logline.

As I stated in the other thread, the two measurements of a film's marketing are A) initial butts in seats (views), and B) word of mouth (comments).

THE DEVIL INSIDE got tons of butts in seats + terrible reviews.
The premise was widely appealing. The product dropped the ball.
The same for SPLICE.

My first data "picture" of the views and comments was both well after everyone had nearly a week to review whatever they were going to look at - and - before the authors and favorites released.
I knew the release of authors and favorites would further distort the data, but after a couple more weeks I'll take another "data picture" and see the measure of that distortion, Pale Yellow's OCD outlier aside. HA!



Logged
Private Message Reply: 42 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 11:34am Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07
The juxtaposition that's at the core of this story is certainly a noble effort, but it's heavy-handed and painfully obvious. On top of that, the concept didn't really work as a film. You hit the reader over the head with both dialogue and violence...which constitutes all nine pages. I get that you were short on ideas, but it seems kind of amateurish to use so much dialogue even when you're desperate. Granted, you broke that rule as part of the design, but the actual content of that dialogue was weak...so it still didn't work. The whole time, it felt like Regina and Joe were the same character. Nothing distinguished their personalities except for the character headers. I've read Wikipedia articles on morality that were more dynamic!

Another problem I had was with Joe's seeming apathy to his handiwork. If he was so sexually-invested in those killings, how was he able to carry on such a thoughtful, coherent conversation? Getting his jollies on would've left him a bit more distracted, wouldn't it? I know he's psychotic, but that's a stretch. Since the characters never once acknowledged what they were doing, it's like you transcribed a long-lost episode of "Fun with Real Audio."

It's strange that you went for such a niche audience with this contest. Coupled with the fact that it's wall-to-wall dialogue and you left out the supernatural requirement...it's like you didn't want to win. It also sounds like you didn't even care, either. I'm not sure what you'd do to fix it. I suppose there are ways you could cut down on the dialogue and allow the action to mingle with it more, but that's more cogitating than I care to field at the moment.

Honestly, I'm surprised this wasn't better, considering the pompous way you ripped into my Room 3. I get that it was a bad script with more than a few problems, but considering the flaws yours had...why was that any reason to be so harsh on a fellow author's work? If anything, I thought that would make you more gracious, considering your own shortcomings. I figure most of us here have a mutual respect for each other. What you said about my work blatantly crossed that line. I sent you a PM about it, but you've yet to respond to it, so I'm calling you out publicly.

If I've misunderstood something about your approach, I apologize, but I doubt I have--it's pretty rough. I know others are appreciative of the time and effort you put into their analyses and I would be too...had you finished it. Not only did you jump ship halfway, but you also used it as a backhanded insult along with your other barbs. And nothing was ever said that others hadn't said in more respectful, friendly manners. So no, I'm not appreciative. I think I would've been more understanding had you avoided my script altogether. You had a lot of work to do and you probably knew reviewing Room 3 wasn't going to benefit either of us. Yet you couldn't pass up the opportunity to flaunt your whatever.

There's no need to explain your actions, but I would hope you'd use some discretion in the future. Writers shouldn't have to take crap from other writers; the rest of the world serves up enough of that on its own. In the immortal words of Rodney Dangerfield, "Relax, will ya?" I'm mad at you, but it's nothing I can't get over. If you read this and you think I'm out of my mind, then that's your right. But I hope this is just a good shakeup and we can have an honest, respectful and professional relationship from now on.


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 43 - 62
Dreamscale
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 12:02pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Dan, hopefully you know that i personally have no problem with giving poor reviews or negative feedback, as I do it quite frequently.

But, I don't like when I see someone doing it, based on poor feedback they received from the same writer, which seems to be the case here, at least in part.

You didn't go into much detail on your script thread in answering any questions posed or mistakes you made.

You really should do that, as you'll probably get some feedback to your words that could help you going forward.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 44 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 2:21pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from Dreamscale
Dan, hopefully you know that i personally have no problem with giving poor reviews or negative feedback, as I do it quite frequently.


Well, I thought yours was a little rough too, but I saw elsewhere that you acknowledged you were rough and apologized for it or somewhat regretted it. That was cool. I had no beef with that. You were trying hard to read everything quickly and it wore you out. I get that. Thanks for admitting that and acknowledging that there are better standards to giving unfavorable reviews.


Quoted Text
But, I don't like when I see someone doing it, based on poor feedback they received from the same writer, which seems to be the case here, at least in part.


Well, you're entitled to that perspective, but after the lambasting I received from Ray, I didn't feel like it was appropriate to sugarcoat my thoughts or be less than brutally honest, since that kind of restraint wasn't shown to me. If respect is to be mutual around here, then I'm simply rising to the occasion. But I've said my piece and I'm ready to restore that mutual respect back to a good, decent level of understanding. Ray took a shot at me, I volleyed back, we're even. Now, I'm ready to put that behind us. But if I continue to get feedback of a similar nature, I'll return it. There's no excuse for it.


Quoted Text
You didn't go into much detail on your script thread in answering any questions posed or mistakes you made...You really should do that, as you'll probably get some feedback to your words that could help you going forward.


I didn't think anybody really cared since they didn't seem interested in seeing it fixed up. Figured I would fix it on my own in private and possibly present it again later. But if you're interested, I'll reconsider that.


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 45 - 62
RayW
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 2:34pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36

Quoted from DanBall
The juxtaposition that's at the core of this story is certainly a noble effort, but it's heavy-handed and painfully obvious.


Yeah.
All people always like subtle.
My entry was crafted just for you.

On top of that, the concept didn't really work as a film.
Right.
It would worked better as a cheese doodle.

You hit the reader over the head with both dialogue and violence...which constitutes all nine pages.

What?!
I couldn't hear you over my crunching.
What?!

I get that you were short on ideas, but it seems kind of amateurish to use so much dialogue even when you're desperate.
'Scuse me. Lemme turn the volume down, first http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgnqkY6Fba4 so I can hear what you're saying more bettererer.

Granted, you broke that rule as part of the design, but the actual content of that dialogue was weak...so it still didn't work.
Rule?
There was a rule?
And I broke it?
D@mnation.
I was trying to destroy it.
Yeah. The dialog was weak. Holds no heavy handed interest.

The whole time, it felt like Regina and Joe were the same character.
I don't even know how to address the discrepancy between how both of us read the story.
Sorry.

Nothing distinguished their personalities except for the character headers.
Okay. See above.
Wait. Are you NOW arguing their difference was toooo subtle for you to notice?

I've read Wikipedia articles on morality that were more dynamic!
Did you get your wikipedia Masters or PhD framed?
I did.

Another problem I had was with Joe's seeming apathy to his handiwork.
Yeah. I'm pretty sure that's an identifying characteristic of a sociopath.

If he was so sexually-invested in those killings, how was he able to carry on such a thoughtful, coherent conversation?
See above reference to wiki PhD.
I've specialized in mental health issues.
The irony, eh?! HA!

Getting his jollies on would've left him a bit more distracted, wouldn't it?
Nope.
I can eat beaver while carrying on a civil conversation.



I know he's psychotic, but that's a stretch.
Then my heavy handedness was toooo subtle for your keen mind.
He's a sociopath, not a psychopath.

Since the characters never once acknowledged what they were doing, it's like you transcribed a long-lost episode of "Fun with Real Audio."
Don't know about the source you cited but I can fold clothes while talking, drive while talking, h3ll, I can even eat while talking.


It's no big deal to not take particular note of what you're doing while you're having a conversation.

It's strange that you went for such a niche audience with this contest.
Yes. Mighty strange.
What the world needs more of in shorts is providing more content to serve all four quadrants.


Coupled with the fact that it's wall-to-wall dialogue and you left out the supernatural requirement...it's like you didn't want to win.
Angels were either toooo heavy handed subtle or a part of your normal and natural world.
Sorry. My bad.

It also sounds like you didn't even care, either.
Play poker much?
It's all about the "WIN RIGHT NOW!"
You'd like it.

I'm not sure what you'd do to fix it.
Then I shall seek informed professional guidance elsewhere.

I suppose there are ways you could cut down on the dialogue and allow the action to mingle with it more, but that's more cogitating than I care to field at the moment.
Yes. More cogitating on the offensive heavy handed action is what I seek!
Maybe you are the right man for the job after all!

Honestly, I'm surprised this wasn't better, considering the pompous way you ripped into my Room 3.
Could you be more specific?
That was the one that had no hurricane in it while the cast of twenty ran about the motel shrubbery in the night, correct?

I get that it was a bad script with more than a few problems, but considering the flaws yours had...why was that any reason to be so harsh on a fellow author's work?
If my house was on fire I cannot possibly stick my head out my window and yell to you "HEY, DAN! YOUR HOUSE IS ALSO ON FIRE!" Right?

If anything, I thought that would make you more gracious, considering your own shortcomings.
I want dentists giving dental advice, lawyers giving law advice, brick layers giving masonry advice.
From whom shall I seek writing advice, then? Hmm... ?

I believe other writers are exactly from whom I want my advice, good or bad.

I figure most of us here have a mutual respect for each other.
I respect you.
I may not respect your writing any more than I respect your dental work, knowledge of the law, or masonry skilz.

What you said about my work blatantly crossed that line.
What line, where?

I sent you a PM about it, but you've yet to respond to it, so I'm calling you out publicly.
If you wanna do this publicly, so be it.
I advise against it though.

FWIW, typically I don't wrestle with pigs in the mud, though.
No one can tell who wins and the pig seems to enjoy it too much.

If I've misunderstood something about your approach, I apologize, but I doubt I have--it's pretty rough.
Nah. I'm pretty sure you got my heavy handed subtleties pretty much nailed.
(Shhh. Don't tell no one: I like it rough!!! It's a seeecret.)

I know others are appreciative of the time and effort you put into their analyses and I would be too...had you finished it.
You ever look at some of those "InkTip production companies wants" requests?
Think that all the reading producers and directors always provide any feedback whatsoever to all of those that send submissions?
Sometimes, like when you don't have hurricanes in your low budget refuge-from-a-hurricane screenplay with a cast of dozens talking in the bushes, the producer/director doesn't ever email you back.
Know why?

Not only did you jump ship halfway, but you also used it as a backhanded insult along with your other barbs.
You're being too subtle.
I don't understand what you're saying.
I need more heavy handedness from you.
You mean the "Pickle, chicken, 3, abacus, Zeus!!! Whatever." was a barb?

And nothing was ever said that others hadn't said in more respectful, friendly manners.
I have no idea what that means, but I'm sure you're correct.
Well, done, sir.

So no, I'm not appreciative.
Okay.

I think I would've been more understanding had you avoided my script altogether.
Well, sh!t, bro!
Had I known that was your submission to the anonymous contest I would have!
Cheers! We'd both be happy!

You had a lot of work to do and you probably knew reviewing Room 3 wasn't going to benefit either of us.
Yes. I probaly would have known what was in your screenplay before reading it had my crystal ball not been on the fritz that afternoon.
And my dog ate my ClifNotes.

Yet you couldn't pass up the opportunity to flaunt your whatever.
HEY, NOW!
Now YOU'VE crossed the line, buddy!
I happen to be quite proud of my... whatever.
It sparkles in the sunlight. Wanna see it again?!
http://image.blingee.com/images16/content/output/000/000/000/56b/429935238_697353.gif

There's no need to explain your actions, but I would hope you'd use some discretion in the future.
Oh, thank God.
In abundance, I promise. Liberally.

Writers shouldn't have to take crap from other writers; the rest of the world serves up enough of that on its own.
I can't think of anyone else I'd rather take cr@p from.

In the immortal words of Rodney Dangerfield, "Relax, will ya?"
Way ahead of ya, 'mater.
I'll wait for you to ketchup.

I'm mad at you, but it's nothing I can't get over.
I am truly blessed.

If you read this and you think I'm out of my mind, then that's your right.
'Preciate that, guv.
Mighty white of you.

But I hope this is just a good shakeup and we can have an honest, respectful and professional relationship from now on.
Consider me officially shook.
Agreed.
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2005/01/11/1101_ag17_gallery__550x369.jpg




Revision History (1 edits)
RayW  -  November 5th, 2012, 3:04pm
Logged
Private Message Reply: 46 - 62
Dreamscale
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 2:40pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from DanBall
I didn't think anybody really cared since they didn't seem interested in seeing it fixed up. Figured I would fix it on my own in private and possibly present it again later. But if you're interested, I'll reconsider that.


Dan, I think you're missing the point here.

We all know that an OWC doesn't give much time for anything, especially fine tuning one's script.  But, most of the time, the writer will post a response to the feedback and address certain issues, as in what he/she was thinking, what was a downright mistake and why it was made, or thanks for catching various mistakes that the writer didn't even realize were mistakes.

For instance, you had a line in your script about a baby, and both Ray and I brought that up, saying, basically, "WTF?".

In Felipe's OWC, I (and I think another 1 or 2 peeps) mentioned that his main character was buttass nude the entire script.  Felipe responded that he forgot and mentioned why he forgot, which was totally cool and understandable.

No one likes getting negative feedback, but there are times (most times, actually) when negative feedback actually helps a whole Hell of alot more than glowing praise, when praise shouldn't be thrown out.

Everyone makes mistakes.  That's totally understandable.  The problem is that mistakes are simply that - something that wasn't supposed to be written the way it was.  The way you learn is when you find out things you didn't know or realize were actually mistakes.

Feedback is meant to help, not hurt.  Sometimes it doesn't come off that way, and I for one know damn well I could say things in a more positive way or be "softer" in my words.

Don't hate the reviewer unless what he or she says is complete horseshit, or downright incorrect.  We're all trying to learn and help at the same time.

Logged
e-mail Reply: 47 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 2:50pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07
Hey Jeff, I'm going to quote your response on the Room 3 thread and reply to it over there.


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 48 - 62
Grandma Bear
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 2:56pm Report to Moderator
Administrator



Location
The Swamp...
Posts
7961
Posts Per Day
1.36
Reading this thread is pretty funny. I assume Dan is not aware of our frequent brawls at SS. This is almost like an argument at MP.  

FWIW, everyone has their own way of reviewing scripts. Some praise everything. Some praise nothing. When you post a script at SS for feedback. You will get all kinds. That's the beauty of it.  


Logged
Private Message Reply: 49 - 62
Dreamscale
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 3:01pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from DanBall
Hey Jeff, I'm going to quote your response on the Room 3 thread and reply to it over there.


OK...not to sure what this means exactly, but I'm game...

Logged
e-mail Reply: 50 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 3:37pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from Dreamscale


OK...not to sure what this means exactly, but I'm game...



Boom.


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 51 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 3:39pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from Grandma Bear
Reading this thread is pretty funny. I assume Dan is not aware of our frequent brawls at SS. This is almost like an argument at MP.  


Not really, but it is a forum on the internet. Not exactly a strange concept.


Quoted Text
FWIW, everyone has their own way of reviewing scripts. Some praise everything. Some praise nothing. When you post a script at SS for feedback. You will get all kinds. That's the beauty of it.  


That might be the beauty of it, but is all of it healthy for the community?


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 52 - 62
ReneC
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 4:32pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
Vancouver, BC
Posts
1435
Posts Per Day
0.31
Dan, as with any set of notes, just take what you need from them and disregard the rest. If you get offended at what people say in their notes you aren't going to make it very far. Grow a thick skin and let it all slide off you. Believe me, the notes you'll get down the road will tear your heart apart if you let them.

Notes are subjective opinions. It's your job to interpret what's at the heart of the notes and address whatever really needs to be improved. They are rarely personal, rarely directed at the writer as a person, so don't take them personally. Just be appreciative of whatever notes you do get, particularly if they help in any way, and move on.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 53 - 62
DV44
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 4:55pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
California
Posts
510
Posts Per Day
0.12
My take on this is i don't think Dan has a problem with criticism on his script but just the way people are revieiwing his script in a demeaning way. It's one thing to say you don't like something but it's different when people take it to a higher level and start making fun of your wriitng at your expense. I believe that's how all this started.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 54 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 5:06pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from DV44
My take on this is i don't think Dan has a problem with criticism on his script but just the way people are revieiwing his script in a demeaning way. It's one thing to say you don't like something but it's different when people take it to a higher level and start making fun of your wriitng at your expense. I believe that's how all this started.


Thanks, Face! I don't think you could've made it simpler. (I certainly didn't!)


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 55 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 5:12pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07
Here's the PM I sent Ray four days ago:


Quoted Text
Hi,

I wrote Room 3 and I was pretty insulted by your analysis. I feel like you went to extraordinary lengths to humiliate and disrespect this author, despite showing respect and decency to nearly everyone else you critiqued. I felt like it crossed a line and wanted you to know that. My hope is that we could discuss this and put a better face on the situation. Thanks!

Dan


Did you have a problem with this, Ray? I gave you several days to reply, but you didn't even acknowledge it, despite being active on other parts of the forum. At that point, was I supposed to just get over it or bend over and ask for more? I'm confused. I thought I gave you a prime opportunity to set this right in case I'd misinterpreted the critique or you were having a bad day when you wrote it, but you didn't seem interested in setting it right. As great and encouraging as this place can be, I didn't think it was right to let this incident go unmentioned and detract from the quality of the community.

I'm not some old experienced guy who's seen it all, but I've seen enough to know that there's rarely a good excuse for one person to insult another while critiquing their work. Most excuses are bad ones, given only to excuse poor, asinine behavior. The only reason the behavior's ever justified is because, occasionally, some of these clowns rise to ranks of prominence and they dish it out from on high too. Still doesn't make it right. Nice people rise up through the ranks too and never compromise their niceness. They probably reject people all day long. But those people probably feel a helluva lot better, despite the bad news. People here have a choice: do you build up your fellow writers despite their flaws or tear them down because they suck? Personally, I don't think the latter is healthy for any kind of creative community and I think it should be discouraged at all costs.


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 56 - 62
RayW
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 5:20pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36
Move on, Dan.



Logged
Private Message Reply: 57 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 5:23pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from RayW
Move on, Dan.



Quoted from RayW
I think this is the author: http://tinyurl.com/987w6nx


So you just want me to forget about this, then? Or do you have anything else to add?


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 58 - 62
RayW
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 5:26pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36
Nope. Yep. Whatever works for you.
Pretty much done before I even started.

LOL! Pretty funny pic, right?
That's my goto guy for... these circumstances.



Logged
Private Message Reply: 59 - 62
wonkavite
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 5:38pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



I finally read this one (yes, I've still got a few lagging reviews unfortunately.)

Competant writing - and I have no problem with the tons o gore.  Don't think it really hit the criteria, though.  Where's the supernatural events (mentioning an angel casually doesn't count), or the decision between good and evil?  (Discussion of it, sure...which was a fun read.  But a decision, it wasn't.)

Enjoyed the read, so kudos there.  But for the overall OWC criteria, not a home run...  
Logged
e-mail Reply: 60 - 62
DanBall
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 5:41pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from RayW
Nope. Yep. Whatever works for you.
Pretty much done before I even started.

LOL! Pretty funny pic, right?
That's my goto guy for... these circumstances.


Well, I wouldn't know since it's usually easier to apologize when someone's upset with me and I don't need tacky pictures to insult them because I try not to insult them. Guess we all can't be class acts like you, Ray.


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 61 - 62
RayW
Posted: November 5th, 2012, 9:01pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36

Quoted from wonkavite
Competant writing - and I have no problem with the tons o gore.  Don't think it really hit the criteria, though.  Where's the supernatural events (mentioning an angel casually doesn't count), or the decision between good and evil?  (Discussion of it, sure...which was a fun read.  But a decision, it wasn't.)

Enjoyed the read, so kudos there.  But for the overall OWC criteria, not a home run...  

Thanks.
Yeah, I kinda foul ball hit the criteria.

Self assessment:
Code

Adherence to Given Criteria:
Odd but interesting character(s) - Juggalo Joe - yes, Regina - no
take refuge from a hurricane - not really
in a beat-up motel - yep
and are forced to make a choice - not really
between good or evil - yep
in order to survive the night. - not really
Each character must -
have some history involving a supernatural event in their lives - Joe does
that factors into their choice. - Regina's choice, but not Joe's
Genre is open. - Horror thriller
This is a micro-budget short, - yep
so no destruction of the motel, - yep
no children or animals - yep
and minimal special effects. - yep
BONUS! Story also included:
mime(s) - Does Juggalo Joe's make up count? I think it should
dinosaur(s) - yep, Regina's mask



The supernatural element was both Juggalo Joe's confession to Regina that he had indeed seen angels which in turn led her to her decision that it was people like him, who have any extreme religious experience, corrupt the moral landscape.

Thus, to return social morality back to some center Juggalo Joe must be removed from the equation.
And J-Joe either didn't understand that or didn't see Regina's thought processes evolving at that moment.

Regina MADE a decision between good and evil, but she wan't FORCED, so that's a big fail on my behalf.

For the audience, as in the real world, even though event A is much more exciting/exhilarating/horrendous/emotionally provocative than event B, which is quite subtle, event B may have a significantly greater impact on your/our lives.

It's a magic show. All misdirection. Look at my obvious left hand, think you're being clever watching my right hand, never see the assistant switching the containers.


Yeah, I just went back to my spreadsheet to build an "Averages" line, Row 68:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsBznn8D13zOdDRjb2JuYjdNelRfUi13OHRwS1JhVEE#gid=0
My own entry did not fare much better than the averages for most all criteria.
My guesstimated costs were a smige lower than average, as was the page count and cost per minute.
Scores were just above or below the average. Nothing to get excited about.

Just a tourist.  



Logged
Private Message Reply: 62 - 62
 Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    October 2012 One Week Challenge  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006