All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
An awful lot of kill tommys in there. There was a decision, but not to survive the night. There was also super natural back story, so points there.
I think the kill Tommy wager could've happened earlier in the script and been more of a driving factor. This thing didn't take off until that proposition was made IMO.
This wasn't bad, but the dialogue and descriptions definitely need some work.
I would have liked it if you had given more hints to Johnny being mentally unstable - this would have left us with the question as to whether Johnny was really being haunted, or if it was all in his head.
I like the way you handled the flashbacks without taking us out of the motel room - very clever.
Towards the end I was a little confused - Tommy is sat before Johnny, the room suddenly goes dark, we hear shuffling feet, then the room lights up and Johnny is stood in the corner with a gun. That whole sequence felt poorly written and just didn't really make much sense to me.
I also think the very end seems pretty anti-climatic. It would have been better if we saw him kill Tommy. Then instead of doing as she'd promised and leaving him alone, the woman is still there. Maybe the woman and old man could start chanting "Kill Johnny, Kill Johnny", goading him to kill himself.
Taking refuge from a hurricane in a beat-up motel? Check.
Odd but interesting character(s)? Check. Mentally unstable robber haunted by his actions.
Choosing between good & evil to survive the night? Fail. Johnny wan't really faced with a choice of good or evil that would lead to his survival, but more of a dilemma as to whether he should do as he is told by the ghost.
Past supernatural event? Check. Ongoing haunting by a previous victim.
Micro budget? Fail. Far too many special effects used (especially the leaking painting) to be anywhere near micro-budget.
A bit hit and miss this one. I loved the visual flashbacks and the painting coming to life but I didn't buy Johnny's mental breakdown. Also I didn't get why Tommy didn't hear the gunshots fired by Johnny at the woman.
The Woman clicked her fingers and the room went dark but the slug stated the room was already dark?
Not a bad effort though.
Check out my scripts...if you want to, no pressure.
This has a lot going for it, the fact that you've kept it to a one room location and still managed to throw in some flashbacks and keep in line with the parameters is good work. Well done.
I like the story in general about someone seeing ghosts or hallucinating over a past traumatic event which he feels guilty over. I do wonder why they didn't mention anything about a bank robbery near the beginning though, the gun just suddenly appeared from Johnny's sock. Maybe if Tommy said along the lines of he's going to get Johnny some help but they have to wait until the heat dies down - an indication of the robbery.
But, thinking about it. If this was just a hallucination then that means the gun, robbery and everything might not have even happened. That would make the death of Tommy pretty harrowing, especially if you could reveal that none of that happened after his death.
So I like the story, but...
For some reason, I just couldn't get into this one and I'm going to put it down to the writing and dialogue.
This line "Noooooo!" really isn't good and I didn't care for all the "kill tommy" stuff either. In fact, do a ctrl-f on the name Tommy and see how many times it is used in this one, it was a lot especially when you consider he didn't speak for a long portion of the script. The dialogue on the whole wasn't doing it for me here, Johnny came off like a 15 year old about ready to suck his thumb - maybe I'm overlooking his mental state which contributed to this.
The writing wasn't bad but it was basic, needs some jazzing up for me. And why the first slug had "dark" instead of night is criminal - well, maybe not that bad but I didn't care for it.
I would also like to add that some things in the story seemed to happen like magic, this for instance: "The room goes dark. Sounds of feet shuffling. The light comes back on." Who turned the light on and off? I have to admit that I immediately thought of that pesky little doll "Mr. Marbles" from Seinfeld with the feet shuffling in the dark line. It gave me a chuckle anyway.
It has potential and is a very fine effort in what is a difficult challenge.
Hit and miss, perhaps because it was rushed. Feels that way to me, like it was written by a skilled writer but didn't get the polish it needs.
The exposition was handled very well, I'm impressed. Lots of back story woven in, and an interesting use of flashbacks (not really flashbacks, more like spotlights in the present showing bits of the past). The dialogue was in and out of the cheese-zone, at times believable and at others just plain bad.
The ending is what killed this. Sure, it's predictable, and that would have been okay if it was also satisfying, but it isn't. Tommy wasn't innocent, so his death has little meaning. If Tommy were just a loving brother and had nothing at all to do with the bank robbery or the killings, that would have been tragic. Or if Johnny had killed himself instead, deciding to spare his brother even though Tommy might really be the true guilty party, that would have had meaning.
Not bad, could be pretty darn good with a rewrite.
Don't understand this 'He nervously strokes his thick beard that doesn’t hide his boyish looks.' Awkward and confusing phrasing.
A huge chunk of the dialouge between Tommy and Johnny could easily be cut and the story would be so much better for it. A lot of it is very stilted and on the nose. All we need is hint at they have done something and Johnny has visions. Two lines each would suffice for that.
'He stands face to the door and closes his eyes.'
Might want to reword that. I think what you mean is that this would be two separate shots, he walk to the door and then with the camera at the door so his eyes are seen closing, but you need to make that clear in your description.
Creative device with the News Reporter used to SHOW what happened. This is yet another reason for cutting most of the preceding dialouge.
Disappointed you didn't do more with the ship, as the imagery from before was a nice reflection of the character in turmoil. The womans comment about it being just for fun undermined its use.
There needed to be much more conflict between Tommy and Johnny. The decision was far too simple in the end. A good effort with a nice creative spark. With some work this could be very good.
This wasn't bad for this OWC. I think some of the dialogue was a bit on the nose. I'm not sure about the spotlights because it kind of gave it the feel of a stageplay for me - not to mention a specific lighting need to drain the budget. And then there was that self-admitted superfluous effect thrown in for yucks.
And the story, while there, wasn't enough to emotionally invest us in the characters.
So overall, I think this needed a bit more to it to be effective - but you did a good job in the time allowed.
I'm a little confused as to whether the bank robbery took place only in Johnny's mind, or if they did occur and supernatural elements are pushing him toward insanity.
The read was a breeze and I much liked the way you introduced the news reporter and the shootings. I did not like that little side trip to the sinking ship. That took me out of the mood.
It seems the ending could have been handled more effectively. I'm unclear as to why Tommy would off the woman and the old man. Maybe Johnny could demand an answer to the killing, so I could determine if Tommy is a cold-blooded killer. If so, then I would know how to feel at the end of the story.
Also, not so sure that Tommy pulled the trigger. The way it is written leaves it ambiguous as to the killer. I'm assuming it's Tommy.
Anyway, I liked the breezy flow of the story. Was so-so on the dialogue, and no fan of the rants. Kudos on the inventiveness of bringing in the back story. Overall, I enjoyed the read and think you have enough here to work on the bugs and move it forward. Congrats on participating in the OWC.
Nice summary from Ryan that I agree with re: the imaginative use of the 'reporter' and victims. Very visual and would play out better on screen than it does in a hastily written one weeker. You should do more to cultivate the dynamic between Tommy and Johnny. I'd envisage something of an Of Mice and Men element to their relationship.
I'm guessing you're not English with your spelling of ageing but you did use "windowsill", so I'm assuming an Aussie. Irrelevant, but I always like the little details.
Liked this. Thought it made good use of the requirements and was an interesting story. I liked the ending; over blackness then the gunshot, topped it off nicely.
Johnny by - On the brink of insanity, Johnny makes a life altering decision. Brief - A brother’s guilty conscious manifests as a tormenting victim seeking penance.
Locations & Sets - Interior, motel room @ night Actors - JOHNNY, 20’s, TOMMY, 30’s, Woman (20?), News reporter(, Old man Costumes - red dress, reporter attire Props - live cockroach + container, ship at sea painting + frame, handgun + ankle holster, corded microphone, liquid stage blood Audio FX - door knob rattles + door pounds, gun shot, people screaming, wallpaper tear, sailor voice over, feet shuffling Visual FX - gun flashes, smoke, bullet holes in wall/ceiling Other - will likely have to wallpaper two walls of the room, picture hanging hooks, drywall patch repair, stunt pads for fall, spotlight, plastic drop sheet to protect room carpet, discarded carpet, controlled tear in the wallpaper will likely have to be done on a separate drywall rig, water pouring out of painting effect Genre & Marketability - Supernatural horror thriller Comments - Handgun isn’t going to stay “tucked in a sock.” News reporter in spotlight is pretty corny. Story of guilt and penance is fair but missable. Characters are neither odd nor interesting. Very good use of a single location. Script format: fine. Final word: story is done to death missable
$2,000 - $3,000 Lo/Hi Estimated Budget Range / 10.0 Screenplay Pages = $200 - $300 Estimated Cost Per Screen Minute
Adherence to Given Criteria: Odd but interesting character(s) - nope take refuge from a hurricane - yep in a beat-up motel - yep and are forced to make a choice - yep between good or evil - implied, but yep in order to survive the night. - sorta, she was otherwise going to just torment him forever Each character must - have some history involving a supernatural event in their lives - yep that factors into their choice. - yep Genre is open. - Supernatural horror thriller This is a micro-budget short, - yep so no destruction of the motel, - yep, but the carpet & drywall/wallpaper stuff adds a lot of cost no children or animals - yep and minimal special effects. - yep BONUS! Story also included: mime(s) - nope dinosaur(s) - nope
I found a lot of the other submissions to be humorous but this, at times, I found it to be a little chilling. I could picture the ghostly images, flickering lights, the chanting, screaming, etc. – great imagery.
Dialogue was a little bland for my taste, none of it seemed forced and had a nice flow though.
Thanks to everyone who took the time to read the script. It was my first and it had several issues across the board.
It was about two brothers Johnny and Tommy who unsuccessfully robbed a bank and killed two hostages during the process. The woman in red was one of the hostages killed who had been haunting Johnny ever since the robbery took place.
The part with the painting of the ship was bad execution on my part. It wasn't meant to be scary. Since I didn't talk about the actual hurricane happening outside the motel I figured I would try and get creative and show a ship in rough seas sailing through a hurricane, again it was bad execution.
I agree with Darren and Ryan in that the "Nooooo" line was cheesy and it will be removed on the rewrite. Also the dialogue was on the nose at times and the action lines needs to get cleaned up.
I got a lot of helpful notes from reviewers and will incorporate them into the rewrite. Thanks again to everybody - Dirk