SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is March 28th, 2024, 8:11am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)
One Week Challenge - Who Wrote What and Writers' Choice.


Scripts studios are posting for award consideration

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    General Boards    Questions or Comments  ›  New Rankings
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 2 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2, 3 » : All
Recommend Print
  Author    New Rankings  (currently 3110 views)
AA Eguavon
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 9:39am Report to Moderator
New


Posts
44
Posts Per Day
0.01
"pale grey" whats all that about
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 15 - 38
TC Taylor
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 9:42am Report to Moderator
New


Abstract

Location
South Carolina
Posts
121
Posts Per Day
0.02
means that you are a light shade of grey...what eles would it mean?


MySpace:

http://www.myspace.com/spyderman_greywolf

WORKING ON:

Nothing....*sigh*
Logged Offline
Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 16 - 38
dogglebe
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 10:05am Report to Moderator
Guest User



It sounds a lot better than dirty white.


Phil
Logged
e-mail Reply: 17 - 38
Pii
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 10:40am Report to Moderator
New


Procrastinator in residence.

Location
Finland
Posts
189
Posts Per Day
0.02
Has anyone ever thought of making a forum ranking that doesn't count the number of posts, but the number of words posted?

It might scale down the people who post short replies just for the sake of getting their post count up. I know that's forbidden in the rules of this forum, but this was more of a general idea.


The act of writing is a quest to put a hundred thousand words to a cunning order.
- Douglas Adams
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 38
TC Taylor
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 10:43am Report to Moderator
New


Abstract

Location
South Carolina
Posts
121
Posts Per Day
0.02
Honestly I dont give a rat's tail about rank, so it doesn't bother me beyond being curious of how it is set up.


MySpace:

http://www.myspace.com/spyderman_greywolf

WORKING ON:

Nothing....*sigh*

Revision History (1 edits)
TC Taylor  -  July 6th, 2005, 10:43am
Logged Offline
Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 19 - 38
Roger Dodger
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 11:04am Report to Moderator
New


"I'm just skin covering coffee..."

Location
UK
Posts
126
Posts Per Day
0.02
In all seriousness (and I know I'm the new guy here) I'm not sure what rank and post count are really worth in a forum where another activity (say dvd trades, for example ) doesn't go on. In those situations a hgh post count/long membership *can* be seen as a sign of trust-worthyness... Although to counter that, I've seen board members build up a count of 1000's in a scarily short period of time.

I daresay the board members who really know their stuff will shine out anyway, through the quality of their replies and advice, regardless of how many times they've posted. People who're posting one-liners here, purely to avoid trying to write their scripts (looks to self) will be shown up soon enough!

Although a bit of banter's always good too, no?


If you fancy something to read...

Short > Safe In The Knowledge
Logged Offline
Private Message ICQ YIM Reply: 20 - 38
Pii
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 12:03pm Report to Moderator
New


Procrastinator in residence.

Location
Finland
Posts
189
Posts Per Day
0.02
I don't think much of rankings either. I just threw away an idea since some people seem to do.


The act of writing is a quest to put a hundred thousand words to a cunning order.
- Douglas Adams
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 21 - 38
George Willson
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 3:28pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Doctor who? Yes, quite right.

Location
Broken Arrow
Posts
3591
Posts Per Day
0.51
I have definitely seen those guilty of short posts to run up not only a high post count for themselves but for their sciript to get a flaming folder as fast as possible...looking to "The A-List" here and its creator...


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 22 - 38
TC Taylor
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 3:34pm Report to Moderator
New


Abstract

Location
South Carolina
Posts
121
Posts Per Day
0.02
Is it just the fact that people think it gives them respect on the forum if they post like hell?  I post when something hits me, I don't care if it gets a flaming folder or a rank up.  I'm still a newb, I feel rank should come from peers and how they rate you.


MySpace:

http://www.myspace.com/spyderman_greywolf

WORKING ON:

Nothing....*sigh*
Logged Offline
Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 23 - 38
George Willson
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 3:47pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Doctor who? Yes, quite right.

Location
Broken Arrow
Posts
3591
Posts Per Day
0.51
One message board I have has an option for a "Karma" rating. There are options to exalt or smite, so the Karma ranking shows what people actually think of each other and completely disregards posts. I can, however, see that getting quickly out of hand...

I wouldn't Karma anyone for awhile given the chance to but not all are like that and wuld smite without thinking of it.



Revision History (1 edits)
George Willson  -  July 6th, 2005, 3:48pm
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 24 - 38
TC Taylor
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 3:50pm Report to Moderator
New


Abstract

Location
South Carolina
Posts
121
Posts Per Day
0.02
We'll have to get to Don or someone high about doing that, I feel that is way better than mindlessly posting.  It'll cut down on mindless posts and make people think harder about what to write and say.


MySpace:

http://www.myspace.com/spyderman_greywolf

WORKING ON:

Nothing....*sigh*
Logged Offline
Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 25 - 38
Old Time Wesley
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 3:53pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Location
Ontario, Canada
Posts
2908
Posts Per Day
0.38
I hope nobody is looking at me because I have 2500 plus posts ha-ha... It took me a good 3 years to get this many, we've had this discussion a year ago and I think the thing that I found is people start these dumb threads for that purpose.

Sometimes I wish Don would just get rid of every non screenwriting related board or restrict posting to 10 posts on each board a month that's not related to screenwriting.

But a guy can only dream.


Practice safe lunch: Use a condiment.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 26 - 38
George Willson
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 3:55pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Doctor who? Yes, quite right.

Location
Broken Arrow
Posts
3591
Posts Per Day
0.51
I think it would to a point. People would shoot for quality posts so they get exalted and not smitten. It would also equalize the playing field somewhat for those who give quality posts but not quantity. That way he who has a post count of 17, could have a higher karma rating for his posts than the one who has over 1000 LOL's but his Karma is quite low because he never says anything.

I'll admit I am kind of high over being top poster number 17, though. It is cool. I do hope my quantity has some measure of quality to it, and not just stupidity.

And this dumb thread was started because Bert noticed his ranking changed. He was curious.



Revision History (1 edits)
George Willson  -  July 6th, 2005, 3:55pm
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 27 - 38
Alan_Holman
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 3:57pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from George Willson
I have definitely seen those guilty of short posts to run up not only a high post count for themselves but for their sciript to get a flaming folder as fast as possible...looking to "The A-List" here and its creator...


His many posts in that thread are because he likes his series.  I understand that mindset very well.  It takes A LOT of restraint to not pimp BANANA CHAN with every word I type.

Logged
e-mail Reply: 28 - 38
TC Taylor
Posted: July 6th, 2005, 3:58pm Report to Moderator
New


Abstract

Location
South Carolina
Posts
121
Posts Per Day
0.02

Quoted from Old Time Wesley
I hope nobody is looking at me because I have 2500 plus posts ha-ha... It took me a good 3 years to get this many, we've had this discussion a year ago and I think the thing that I found is people start these dumb threads for that purpose.

Sometimes I wish Don would just get rid of every non screenwriting related board or restrict posting to 10 posts on each board a month that's not related to screenwriting.

But a guy can only dream.


I respect that u've worked that long, that is why I feel if we could do the Karma thing that super stars on the boards like u Wesley will have a karma that stays at near or at perfect all the time, and you  couldnt go below a set Karma rating, u'd stay at perfect anyway since u are a cool guy and all, I'd worry about newbs that u bash their script giving u a bad Karma rating.


MySpace:

http://www.myspace.com/spyderman_greywolf

WORKING ON:

Nothing....*sigh*
Logged Offline
Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 29 - 38
 Pages: « 1, 2, 3 » : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Questions or Comments  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006