SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 24th, 2024, 12:15pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    One Week Challenge    February 2011 One Week Challenge  ›  A Word About The February One Week Challenge Moderators: Grandma Bear
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

 Pages: « ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 » : All
Recommend Print
  Author    A Word About The February One Week Challenge  (currently 21513 views)
mcornetto
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:01pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from Ryan1


Are you sure about that, Greg?  If you read the review James left for Captive, it would lead me to think otherwise.  Bringing up the weaknesses in the script and then declaring it his favorite.  If his intention was to throw everyone off, it worked.  


Oh this Captive thing is driving me crazy.  E.D. please pm me and tell me who wrote it so I can get other things done.  I won't tell anyone else.  Cheers.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 330 - 359
greg
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:04pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Oh Hi

Location
San Diego, California
Posts
1680
Posts Per Day
0.24

Quoted from Ryan1


Are you sure about that, Greg?  If you read the review James left for Captive, it would lead me to think otherwise.  Bringing up the weaknesses in the script and then declaring it his favorite.  If his intention was to throw everyone off, it worked.  


Ah, a classic SS trick.  The other side of the coin would be to declare it the worst of the bunch to throw everyone off as well.

I dunno, the script just seemed like his writing.  Or maybe it was Alan Holman's.


Be excellent to each other
Logged
Private Message Reply: 331 - 359
DarrenJamesSeeley
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:05pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Michigan.USA
Posts
1522
Posts Per Day
0.31

Quoted from Grandma Bear
Give Don a break and all come out. That way he doesn't get the pressure of having to spend hours on this anytime soon.


I'll give Don some slack.
The Flesh Won't Be Missed
Wild Ginger's Wine


"I know you want to work for Mo Fuzz. And Mo Fuzz wants you to. But first, I'm going to need to you do something for me... on spec." - Mo Fuzz, Tapeheads, 1988
my scripts on ss : http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1095531482/s-45/#num48
The Art!http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-knowyou/m-1190561532/s-105/#num106
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 332 - 359
Sandra Elstree.
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:18pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


What if the Hokey Pokey, IS what it's all about?

Location
Bowden, Alberta
Posts
3664
Posts Per Day
0.60

Quoted from DarrenJamesSeeley


I'll give Don some slack.
The Flesh Won't Be Missed
Wild Ginger's Wine


Wild Ginger's Wine. Such a cool title. Such a unique way you did this one. Good on ya.

Sandra



A known mistake is better than an unknown truth.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 333 - 359
bert
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:32pm Report to Moderator
Administrator


Buy the ticket, take the ride

Location
That's me in the corner
Posts
4233
Posts Per Day
0.61
McClung did not write Captive.  I know this for a fact.

[edit:  Unless he is a liar haha]


Hey, it's my tiny, little IMDb!
Logged
Private Message Reply: 334 - 359
DarrenJamesSeeley
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:34pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Michigan.USA
Posts
1522
Posts Per Day
0.31

Quoted from Sandra Elstree.


Wild Ginger's Wine. Such a cool title. Such a unique way you did this one. Good on ya.

Sandra


I'm starting the responses in that thread; the format was unintended. I was caught stacking. That was my mess up.

BTW, I did rewrite and correct it, the new version will be up in a few days if not sooner. The ending is also different and the three human characters have a little fleshing out.



"I know you want to work for Mo Fuzz. And Mo Fuzz wants you to. But first, I'm going to need to you do something for me... on spec." - Mo Fuzz, Tapeheads, 1988
my scripts on ss : http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1095531482/s-45/#num48
The Art!http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-knowyou/m-1190561532/s-105/#num106
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 335 - 359
mcornetto
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:36pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from bert
McClung did not write Captive.  I know this for a fact.

[edit:  Unless he is a liar haha]


My last and final guess....

In the spirit of ultimate loops -  Rick wrote Captive so he could produce his own film...

It's as valid as any other guesses.  
Logged
e-mail Reply: 336 - 359
DarrenJamesSeeley
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:37pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Michigan.USA
Posts
1522
Posts Per Day
0.31

Quoted from bert
McClung did not write Captive.  I know this for a fact.

[edit:  Unless he is a liar haha]



I'm starting to think it may be someone who recently joined up, Bert. Maybe not  newbie to writing, but just to SS.





"I know you want to work for Mo Fuzz. And Mo Fuzz wants you to. But first, I'm going to need to you do something for me... on spec." - Mo Fuzz, Tapeheads, 1988
my scripts on ss : http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1095531482/s-45/#num48
The Art!http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-knowyou/m-1190561532/s-105/#num106
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 337 - 359
mcornetto
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:43pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from DarrenJamesSeeley



I'm starting to think it may be someone who recently joined up, Bert. Maybe not  newbie to writing, but just to SS.





Ok then.  Extraterrestrials from the planet Ohzod wrote Captive.  There's a large lag in their internet connection which is why they haven't responded yet.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 338 - 359
Scar Tissue Films
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:44pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3382
Posts Per Day
0.63

Quoted from leitskev
It is understandable that people choose to work with or hire people that they have worked with before, people they trust. I don't think that should really be a part of the process here, however. It was set up as a Challenge, a contest.

If one's resume and biography was to be a part of it, then do it differently. Invite people to post with their info.

If you want this to maintain its credibility, you'll want to encourage the notion that the producer will pick the script he likes best. Which is what I think happened, but the other remarks suggest something more complicated.

I ask this innocently: how thickly collaborative is a short? How much does the director need from the writer once he decides on the story?

If there is more work needed on a script, and for some reason the author became unavailable, could not another writer step in and help?

I think there should be a little benefit of the doubt given on writers submitting a short. They would for the most be eager to see their work produced, so would be active in the process. But if in the unlikely event that turned out to be not the case, the producer would figure that out quickly, and either get another writer to help, or move on to another script.

There is already a sense in this industry that if you don't know someone and haven't been produced yet, it's very difficult to break in. People enter contests like this because there is a hope they will be a little different. Reading Rick's posts, I had the sense he was being very fair, looking for what matched his vision. I just hope it stays that way in the future.


There's no dodginess going on...but I understand why you were worried.

The OWCs aren't competitions, they were created by a board member as a challenge. The prime purpose of them was for people to comment anonymously on the scripts so that the writers could improve.

Some people would enter and never give feedback, so they became known as leeches...taking feedback but giving nothing back.

In this particular one there was a "prize" of sorts...and it's natural that Bert hoped that a script that got so much attention was by a regular who has contributed a lot, rather than someone who has just signed up for the contest and will never say anything on the board.

Rick.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 339 - 359
leitskev
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:48pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3113
Posts Per Day
0.63
I just read Wonka's rewrite of Territory. She really added a lot to it, very nice improvement. I think she's going to repost soon, hope people take another look. The first scene is all new.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 340 - 359
mcornetto
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:53pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from Scar Tissue Films


There's no dodginess going on...but I understand why you were worried.

The OWCs aren't competitions, they were created by a board member as a challenge. The prime purpose of them was for people to comment anonymously on the scripts so that the writers could improve.

Some people would enter and never give feedback, so they became known as leeches...taking feedback but giving nothing back.

In this particular one there was a "prize" of sorts...and it's natural that Bert hoped that a script that got so much attention was by a regular who has contributed a lot, rather than someone who has just signed up for the contest and will never say anything on the board.

Rick.


And to add on to this -- Rick's choice is not really considered a part of the OWC.  He might have set the goal for the challenge and as a result he has a pool of scripts he could choose from (if he wanted one).   But the OWC is the process of script creation over a short period of time, not the outcome of the script actually being chosen for production.  

In a sense because Rick was looking for a script you get a better OWC experience because you are getting an actual production request and you feel that your script has a possibility of being produced at the end.  You take it more seriously.  

However, the OWC and Rick's production are only associated via timing and in no other way.      
Logged
e-mail Reply: 341 - 359
Electric Dreamer
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:55pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Taking a long vacation from the holidays.

Location
Los Angeles
Posts
2740
Posts Per Day
0.55
Wow, I went to the beach and you're still guessing.
Well, I've had my fun, so here's the reveal.
I hope he won't mind being outed.
I will say this, he did greatly appreciate the heated debate on the thread by members.
He's a good bloke and wants to contribute more, film school makes it tough.

And without further adieu, I give you...

http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?v-memberpanel/a-view/u-shootingduck/

E.D.


LATEST NEWS

CineVita Films
is producing a short based on my new feature!

A list of my scripts can be found here.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 342 - 359
leitskev
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 8:55pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3113
Posts Per Day
0.63
Well said Rick, and I was very impressed with how it was run. I've posted a lot on the Challenge, and pretty much all positive. I also trust Bert, and the fact that he posted his concern in the open when he could have used PM suggests action of integrity. Great job, I learned a lot, and I am busy doing reads for people. I've sent in my own rewrite of SL and I think we're all working together to get better. My post above was a response to some other remarks. I'm looking forward to the film!
Logged
Private Message Reply: 343 - 359
DarrenJamesSeeley
Posted: March 5th, 2011, 9:08pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Michigan.USA
Posts
1522
Posts Per Day
0.31

Quoted from mcornetto


Ok then.  Extraterrestrials from the planet Ohzod wrote Captive.  There's a large lag in their internet connection which is why they haven't responded yet.


No. It was Ohrod's third moon...
Seriously, reason I think it's recent member is because the runner up was. Of course, it may be a SS vet----they love seeing you go dizzy!

(posted before I saw ED's note n Shooting Duck)


"I know you want to work for Mo Fuzz. And Mo Fuzz wants you to. But first, I'm going to need to you do something for me... on spec." - Mo Fuzz, Tapeheads, 1988
my scripts on ss : http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1095531482/s-45/#num48
The Art!http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-knowyou/m-1190561532/s-105/#num106
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 344 - 359
 Pages: « ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 » : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    February 2011 One Week Challenge  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006