SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 18th, 2024, 5:38pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  The Manchurian Candidate Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 5 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    The Manchurian Candidate  (currently 1187 views)
AmericanSyCo
Posted: July 31st, 2004, 10:02pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



It seems that with every re-make, every fanboy across the world has their very own unique reaction.  There are the fundamentalist fanboys who go nuts; they scream and flood message boards with nothing but negative posts and rants.  Then, there are the more open fanboys; the ones whom greet the new vision with open arms, wondering what new things there are to discover within an old, beloved idea.

Of course, most of the time these re-hashes fall completely flat.  For every "The Fly" (1986) or "Dawn of the Dead" (2004), there is a "Psycho" ('98) or "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" ('04), (or, worse, a re-edit, such as the dreaded "Night of the Living Dead 30th Anniversary Edition").  Luckily, Johnathan Demme's update to "The Manchurian Candidate" falls in the former category.

Liutenant Ben Marco (Denzel Washington) is a very paranoid guy.  Things are only made worse when a Gulf War buddy shows up with some alarming sketches.  This sets off a fuse in Marco's head, making his mind spiral into the very depths of a horrible conspiricy involving a young, up-and-coming Vice President candidate (and fellow milatary comrade) Raymond Shaw (Liev Schreiber) and his ultra-bitch mother, Eleanor (Meryl Streep).  What ensues is a an ever-changing plot of political intrigue (major cliche, I know).

Where "Candidate" succeeds is its attitude towards never slowing down the pace.  Things are constantly changing, and, God forbid, you blink, you may just miss an important detail.  Director Demme also never shys away from showing some distubing images.  This works especially well considering how much it gets you to hate the bad guys and really root for the ever-crazy Ben Marco.

Where this re-make fails is its never-ending eye for detail.  Like I said, you really need to keep your eyes open or something might just fly right by your face.  This works as a pro and a con simply because certain people like a thought-provoking thriller while some loathe it.  Another problem is Demme's camera work.  While POV close-up shots may be his style, in this is just gets annoying with Denzel's face constantly plastered on a forty foot screen.  Like "Silence of the Lambs," this may end up working better on a 27 inch television screen.  On the big screen, some close-ups are almost laughibly awkward.

In the end, "The Manchurian Candidate" is a really good thriller that should hold any conspiracy theorist together for a couple of months.  Just a final warning: those looking for realism, look the other way- this thing is practically Science Fiction.

*** out of ****

Now, I've also seen "The Village" as well, but I am not writing a review for it (the DVD version perhaps) simply because I am still not sure if it was a "Thumbs Up" or "Thumbs Down" film (it was smack dab in the middle).  Though, I will say this: M. Night has got to let go of the damn surprises. In this, it's not the ending, but rather the middle...

...and it is absolutely horrendous.  I welcome anyone else who is not as torn as I to construct a review.    
Logged
e-mail
Old Time Wesley
Posted: July 31st, 2004, 11:01pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Location
Ontario, Canada
Posts
2908
Posts Per Day
0.38
If you mean for The Village I will after tuesday because that's when I'm going to see it


Practice safe lunch: Use a condiment.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 4
lesleyjl21
Posted: August 2nd, 2004, 9:44pm Report to Moderator
New


Location
Southern California
Posts
206
Posts Per Day
0.03
Brilliant review, SyCo.  

If I had not become so consumed within the development for my new screenplay I swear I'm going to submit for Nicholls next year, I was thinking I wanted to come on here and debate the original vs. the remake.  Now that I'm taking a brief break... I saw the original in my editing class earlier this past week and we were told to go see the new one as our homework assignment.

The opening credits had me a little annoyed.  Couldn't figure out why they kept fading back inside the Humvee with the unit playing cards even if the song did keep changing.  I get the time elapse and it was okay the first two times, then I was like, "Is there any point to this?"  I was thankful when they finally switched outside the vehicle.

Honestly, I was both captivated and repelled.  There were some pretty cool scenes even if I don't think I really liked the ending, I'm iffy about it.  And as a motion graphics person, this is probably just me - maybe no one else noticed - but those dynamic 3D news graphics were mesmerizing.  Everytime they showed a television set, I was truly fixated.  Anyway, I got the reference to the original with the first shot of Eleanor watching her son speak on camera as he speaks live in the background.  Nice homage to Frankenheimer.  

Also, maybe this is just me, but did anyone else find that Eleanor/Raymond scene (where he's got the whammy on him and she's all close to him) a little incestuously overtoned?  Maybe I'm shocking a few by saying it, but I found it to be so.  Then they made the cut.  From a female perspective though (hey don't mind me) Raymond Shaw is INDEED the kindest, warmest, bravest, handsomest... okay, LOL, I'll stop.

Did we ever figure out the Cup O Noodles angle?


true love waits... i guess.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 2 - 4
AmericanSyCo
Posted: August 3rd, 2004, 12:17pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Ditto on the incest overtone.  I was just waiting for Eleanor to start making out with her son at that part where he's completely lost it and she dressing him.  Though, that may have brought the whole film down a few notches... actually, it would have ruined it, so I'm glad they didn't go any further.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 3 - 4
lesleyjl21
Posted: August 3rd, 2004, 3:52pm Report to Moderator
New


Location
Southern California
Posts
206
Posts Per Day
0.03
I started to think maybe if they had shown this in test groups (I've been in a couple of test groups for various movies throughout the years), people might have reacted against it because I saw a definite abrupt cut like the scene must have gone on longer.

Or maybe they just weren't ready to venture into that angle.


true love waits... i guess.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 4 - 4
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006