SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 19th, 2024, 6:28pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  G.I. Joe Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 3 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    G.I. Joe  (currently 1731 views)
BlazingStar
Posted: August 18th, 2009, 10:51pm Report to Moderator
New



Posts
18
Posts Per Day
0.00
I went to see it.  I just wanted to see how they would take the comic book and show and turn it into a movie. It was OK IMO.

The storyline was about what we've come to expect for action films.  Not too complicated or anything.  I don't expect as much from an action film as I do a suspense film or a high caliber film.

For me, I think I wanted to see the action sequences and what advances they made with the digital effects.

Speaking of which. what did you all think of the digital effects?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 15 - 19
Old Time Wesley
Posted: August 19th, 2009, 1:57am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Location
Ontario, Canada
Posts
2908
Posts Per Day
0.38

Quoted from BlazingStar

The storyline was about what we've come to expect for action films.  Not too complicated or anything.  I don't expect as much from an action film as I do a suspense film or a high caliber film.

For me, I think I wanted to see the action sequences and what advances they made with the digital effects.

Speaking of which. what did you all think of the digital effects?


You just summed the movie up. Nothing new, nothing special.

The effects are always top notch but we need some substance in order to say that these types of movies are needed.

Some try and others copy the formula that sells tickets opening weekend. For all the grief Hancock gets at least it tried to disrupt the basic formula of this genre.

Even My Super Ex-Girlfriend deserves more credit.


Practice safe lunch: Use a condiment.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 16 - 19
albinopenguin
Posted: August 19th, 2009, 4:32pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


I got dipping sticks.

Location
Los Angeles
Posts
785
Posts Per Day
0.14
The WORST film of the Summer. Normally I would say "I don't know where to begin..." (when everything is downright awful), but this movie is an exception. For a film that had a $125 million dollar budget, there was no excuse for the CGI to look as bad as it did. There was even crappy CGI effects in scenes which did not need CGI effects to begin with (ie a CGI car was inserted for an overhead shot of a car driving up to a mansion). In all honesty, this movie had the worst CGI I've seen in a very long time. CGI aside, the movie was still cr**. The story was paper thin, the acting was hokey, the direction was mediocre, etc etc. Even the one liners (if you can call them that) were bad.  Don't waste your time renting this film, even if you were an avid GI Joe fan.

The only thing I liked about the movie was the transitions between the above ground ground action to the under water action. That and the fact that I saw it in Japan and I didn't mind a small taste of America.

I didnt think there could be a more noisy and outright dumb film than Transformers 2 this summer until GI Joe: Rise of the Cobra came around.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 17 - 19
Aaron
Posted: August 19th, 2009, 9:16pm Report to Moderator
New


That's me

Location
Spring Hill, FL
Posts
425
Posts Per Day
0.08

Quoted from albinopenguin
$125 million dollar budget


About the budget, not trying to correct what you said but the budget was $175 M, so that's a waste for that much money


Isle 10- A series I'm currently writing with my friend Adam and it will go into production soon. Think The Office meets 10 Items or Less.

Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 18 - 19
BlazingStar
Posted: August 20th, 2009, 6:38pm Report to Moderator
New



Posts
18
Posts Per Day
0.00

Quoted from albinopenguin
For a film that had a $125 million dollar budget, there was no excuse for the CGI to look as bad as it did. There was even crappy CGI effects in scenes which did not need CGI effects to begin with (ie a CGI car was inserted for an overhead shot of a car driving up to a mansion). In all honesty, this movie had the worst CGI I've seen in a very long time. CGI aside, the movie was still cr**.

The only thing I liked about the movie was the transitions between the above ground ground action to the under water action. That and the fact that I saw it in Japan and I didn't mind a small taste of America.


I totally agree.  I just thought that a lot of the digital effects were a little weak.  The underground action and the whole world that they created under the desert and the ice was pretty cool.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 19 - 19
 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006