SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 16th, 2024, 3:42am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Clash of the Titans Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 2 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Clash of the Titans  (currently 2315 views)
Dreamscale
Posted: April 6th, 2010, 9:07pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



I went in expecting to love it, as I fondly remember seeing the original in the theater (is that dating my old ass, or what?).

I was unimpressed almost immediately with the effects and 3D.

The Olympus stuff was cheesy at best.

The witches were terrible.

Even Medusa was weak compared to the original, but probably the 2nd best scene, next to the Scorps...but after we see the desert people riding the big ones, where's the threat?

You guys probably know that this was not supposed to be a 3D movie, and I think that's why the 3D effects were so poor.  It may play better in 2D.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 15 - 22
Zack
Posted: April 6th, 2010, 9:09pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Erlanger, KY
Posts
4497
Posts Per Day
0.69
I agree about the 3d not being very good. It kinda hurt my eyes. I'm gonna see it in 2d when my theater gets it.

~Zack~
Logged
Private Message Reply: 16 - 22
ABennettWriter
Posted: April 6th, 2010, 11:48pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
San Francisco, CA
Posts
864
Posts Per Day
0.14
It's better in 2D. The 3D was blurry and the action scenes were cheesy.

For those people not satisfied with the movie: As long as you don't finish the movie, go to the box office and either get a refund or a rain check. Customer service is the utmost importance to movie theaters and if you're not satisfied, the managers and staff will do everything they can to make you happy. It's quite sad, but next time, go back and get a raincheck.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 17 - 22
Andrew
Posted: April 7th, 2010, 1:03am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Posts
1791
Posts Per Day
0.32
Everything suffered from the runtime - it's as simple as that.

It's a 3 hour film wedged into 106 minutes.

Not a bad starter kit for Greek mythology.

Not great, but hardly terrible.

Andrew


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 22
Baltis.
Posted: April 7th, 2010, 1:13am Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from ABennettWriter
It's better in 2D. The 3D was blurry and the action scenes were cheesy.

For those people not satisfied with the movie: As long as you don't finish the movie, go to the box office and either get a refund or a rain check. Customer service is the utmost importance to movie theaters and if you're not satisfied, the managers and staff will do everything they can to make you happy. It's quite sad, but next time, go back and get a raincheck.


We "Could" do that... But then all we'd have to bitch about it the time that we lost.  I like it much better this way.  This way I can bitch about the money and the time I lost.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 19 - 22
RunningFox
Posted: July 30th, 2010, 2:04pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Manchester, England
Posts
43
Posts Per Day
0.01
Oh... My... Christ.  I just got through watching this and I have to say, it's quite simply one of the WORST films I have ever seen - my brains are practically pouring out my ears.


"We're gonna need to watch that again..."

Revision History (1 edits)
RunningFox  -  July 31st, 2010, 12:24pm
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 20 - 22
Dreamscale
Posted: July 30th, 2010, 2:20pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



I agree, Fox, it's pure crap!
Logged
e-mail Reply: 21 - 22
MacDuff
Posted: July 31st, 2010, 11:50am Report to Moderator
Been Around


I should be writing...

Location
Beautiful BC
Posts
745
Posts Per Day
0.10
Watched it last night - was thinking it would be a popcorn movie, but after the end credits I felt a little blah about it.

- Too much story packed into 106 minutes, therefore it felt rushed. The story lacked depth in my opinion - just moved from one scene to the next.
- Good special effects, though I have to agree with Balt - the climax was very anti-climactic. A waste of screen time indeed.
- Shallow, shallow characters. A hodge-podge thrown together. Don't understand it.

Basically the film lacked any impact for me. It just sort of came and went.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 22 - 22
 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006