SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 25th, 2024, 5:24am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  The Girl Who Played With Fire Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 8 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    The Girl Who Played With Fire  (currently 349 views)
Heretic
Posted: July 11th, 2010, 1:25pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts
2023
Posts Per Day
0.28
Humph.  This one sucks.

Remaining from the first film are the strong performances, well-done natural cinematography, and general strong directing.  What was somewhat of a problem in the first film, though, destroys this one; the story sucks.  Absolutely at no point does anyone do anything interesting, ever.  The mystery is lame, the sleuthing is boring, Blomkvist and Salander don't even see each other, the twists are dumb, and the stakes are paltry.  There's simply nothing going on in this film at any point, and it lasts for two and a half hours.

The sex feels more gratuitous and the more intense story moments feel much less powerful than in the first film.

I haven't read the books, so I'm not sure if the plot of the third will be more interesting, but if you have and it isn't, then I recommend skipping this one altogether.  The only reason to see it would be to set yourself up for the third.

Oh and DO NOT see this until you have seen the first.  I feel like you'd be completely lost if you did so.

SPOILER OF SORTS:

The last act bears an amusing resemblance to Faster Pussycat!  Kill!  Kill!  Probably not what we were meant to be thinking of at that point in the movie, but one can't really help it considering the characters...

Revision History (1 edits)
Heretic  -  July 12th, 2010, 10:57pm
Logged Offline
Site Private Message
Old Time Wesley
Posted: July 14th, 2010, 12:56pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Location
Ontario, Canada
Posts
2908
Posts Per Day
0.38
What did you expect when they rushed out a series and three films in one year?

I read all these comments about Hollywood this and Hollywood that but foreign filmmakers are just as bad.

At least Hollywood waits a few years to disappoint fans.

How many years will it be until we are disappointed by Spiderman and X-men the continuing sagas of why the fuck are you continuing.


Practice safe lunch: Use a condiment.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 1
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006