SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 19th, 2024, 5:52am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Scott Pilgrim vs. The World Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 4 Guests

 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Scott Pilgrim vs. The World  (currently 3766 views)
kev
Posted: August 23rd, 2010, 4:42pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Toronto, Ontario
Posts
383
Posts Per Day
0.05
See this movie! I saw Scott Pilgrim vs. The World last night and was blown away, it's really a bummer this movie isn't making a dent in the box office, it's the best time I've had at the movies in a long time. I know the worlds getting a little sick of Michael Cera and his typecast of the awkward virgin but he really gives it his all in this movie and even the Cera haters of the world could appreciate this movie. The movie has a pretty lengthy running time for the type of film it is but it flies by, it's so fast paced and the way the story is told is brilliant. From a filmmakers point of view this is really one to see, it's original and the editing is amazing! I strongly suggest the SS crew goes and sees this one in theaters, it's definitely one that is fun with a crowd.  


Logged Offline
Private Message
tonkatough
Posted: August 24th, 2010, 11:31pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Australia
Posts
581
Posts Per Day
0.09
Yep I saw this. fun times. The basic idea was retarded (boy meets girl, boy has to fight ex-boyfriends to the death to win girl) and the actual girl that Scott has to fight for is about as exciting as a plank of wood. But for sheer crazy ass style and originality this movie is light years ahead of most of the mediocre mainstream blockbuster so far this year.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 21
Heretic
Posted: August 28th, 2010, 7:01pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts
2023
Posts Per Day
0.28
Brilliant cast with the exception of the normally lovable Mary Elizabeth Winstead -- "exciting as a plank of wood" is spot on.  Kieran Culkin borderline steals the show, and the Vegan police were a delightfully random bit of casting.

Great film.  One of, if not the, best blockbusters of the year.  Highly recommended for good old-fashioned (or, new-fashioned) fun.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 2 - 21
JonnyBoy
Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 6:09am Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
London, England
Posts
994
Posts Per Day
0.18
Saw this yesterday - the most fun I've had at the cinema for a long, long time. Edgar Wright has probably established himself as my new favourite director - I loved Shaun of the Dead, thought Hot Fuzz was even better, but this was something else.

For sheer visual pizzazz and verve, I haven't seen something to equal this in a long, long time. The film I'd compare it to, in a way, is Sin City. When I saw that film, I thought "well, that's probably the definitive comic book film". And even though this isn't based on a video game, it's probably the definitive video game film. To some, it might seem gimmicky; but to me, it's a sculpture of pop culture, not full of references but built out of them. What also marks Wright out for me is his command of editing. He uses it brilliantly in Hot Fuzz, too - nobody else I know has the mastery of match cuts that Wright has.

I'd argue (and this might sound like defending the indefensible) that Winstead played it that way entirely intentionally. She was aloof and taciturn, not necessarily unexciting. It also helped further polarise Knives and Ramona. It didn't bother me, at any rate. Michael Cera is in danger of becoming a parody of himself, but by and large the acting was all great. Not that the performances were the main attraction here - this is, first and foremost, a visual feast.

So yeah, I loved it. Is it a great narrative? No. Will it win Oscars for its acting? Of course not. But is it actually an valuable piece of art? As ridiculous as it sounds, I'd argue: yes. Works by Roy Lichtenstein and his pop art colleagues hang in galleries around the world; if that was 'pop art', I'd say this is the cinematic equivalent. It won't get the praise I think it deserves from its contemporaries, and it's heading towards being a major financial disappointment for Universal, but I'm going to go out on a limb and make a prediction: this is one that will last. They'll be teaching this one on film courses in twenty, thirty years time.

And I don't think I can say that about any other film so far this year.


Guess who's back? Back again?
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 3 - 21
rc1107
Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 7:02am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
Youngstown
Posts
1241
Posts Per Day
0.20
Hmm.  When I saw previews for this a couple months ago, I said to myself that this is going to be a horrible, boring, wanna-be superhero movie.  (Which I don't even like superhero movies anyway.)  And I had no intention of even giving this movie the time of day.

Now, after seeing a couple reviews, I might have to rent it when it goes to redbox.  (I think I still need a couple more positive kick-ass reviews before I'll go see it in a theater.)


Logged
Private Message YIM Reply: 4 - 21
Electric Dreamer
Posted: October 2nd, 2010, 9:36am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Taking a long vacation from the holidays.

Location
Los Angeles
Posts
2740
Posts Per Day
0.55
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World makes me sad.
I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, but I think it will further damage "boutique comics".

Jonah Hex, Kick A*s & Scott Pilgrim violently underperformed at the boxoffice.
Hex cost $50 after fired directors and reshoots, it grossed $10 million.
Kick A*s broke even after the $15 million Lionsgate paid for distribution rights.
Scott Pilgrim is my favorite $80 million movie no one but the geeks went to see.

Edgar Wright put everything he had into Scott Pilgrim and it shows big time!
However, I'm worried that poor boxoffice could spell doom for obscure comics.


LATEST NEWS

CineVita Films
is producing a short based on my new feature!

A list of my scripts can be found here.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 21
Brian M
Posted: October 2nd, 2010, 11:40am Report to Moderator
New



Location
Glasgow
Posts
434
Posts Per Day
0.08
In my local cinema, some showings are still selling out even though it was released a while ago. As for the film, I didn't quite "get it". Sure, there are quite a few laugh out loud moments, and it looked like a polished blockbuster film, but I found it tiresome and wanted it to end 20 minutes early. A little disappointed after reading  many great reviews.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 21
Old Time Wesley
Posted: November 11th, 2010, 10:57pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Location
Ontario, Canada
Posts
2908
Posts Per Day
0.38
I actually didn't hate Jonah Hex... I'm starting to not hate films anymore. Megan Fox needs to OD already though because I hate that untalented twat.

Anyway, Scott Pilgrim was the shit. Period.

The blu ray release has four commentaries and a bunch of other stuff much like Edgar's other films and hopefully will make all that cash back on DVD & Blu Ray.

Where did all that money go though is what I wondered while watching this?

I don't understand as we move forward in time why effects films cost more and more when studios could in reality own their own and cut costs thus making films look kick ass and be true to a director's vision and be able to perform at the box office without being a flop when the movie is so well received.


Practice safe lunch: Use a condiment.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 21
James McClung
Posted: December 13th, 2010, 8:58pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48
Just saw this. Completely surpassed my expectations. I'd already heard that it was surpassing everyone's expectations but I was thoroughly impressed, just the same. Completely different from either Shaun of the Dead or Hot Fuzz. Wright's actually got some genuine directing chops. Very Michel Gondry-esque but he does his own thing.

It got a little too cheesy at times and a little much with the hipster iconography but if you can make indie rock seem even remotely cool within five minutes, that's a feet. And where else are you going to see a goth lesbian orgasm to death and explode into gold coins with a neon blue +3,000 power up?

Most of all, it was a very sweet movie at its core, despite the comic book/hipster extravaganza. One of my favorite movies this year, for sure.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 21
MacDuff
Posted: December 13th, 2010, 10:52pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


I should be writing...

Location
Beautiful BC
Posts
745
Posts Per Day
0.10
My second favorite movie of the year (behind Inception). Thought it was a breath of fresh air. Loved every minute of it and Edgar Wright is one of my favorite directors and it's got his mark all over it.

Top 3 movies of the year?

Inception
Scott Pilgrim vs The World
(500) Days of Summer


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 21
Lon
Posted: December 29th, 2010, 1:56pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Louisville
Posts
403
Posts Per Day
0.06
It took me two viewings to see this movie.  Fell asleep during my first attempt.

I'd label it style without substance.  I'm normally a fan of Edgar Wright's, but I don't see the appeal of Michael Cera.  No offense intended toward his fans, but how this guy ever became a movie star, and why, is beyond me.

The only thing I actually liked about it was his little stalker, the Asian girl.  Very cute.

Aside from that....pfffft.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 21
Tommyp
Posted: December 29th, 2010, 9:25pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


Continuity Is For Pussies...

Location
Australia
Posts
701
Posts Per Day
0.12
I thought this film was silly and absurd.... in a bad way.

Too many random cuts and rubbish which didn't fit into the world of the film.

Annoying, after I heard so many good things about it.

3/10.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 21
Eric2nimrod
Posted: December 30th, 2010, 3:07am Report to Moderator
New



Location
Fort Worth, TX
Posts
29
Posts Per Day
0.01
I have to admit that besides The Social Network, this was the only film I could actually pay attention to all the way through. Even though the movie is silly in its entireness, the music is incredible and I can relate to most of the characters, strangely enough...I liked it and I don't care what anybody says, it's a good movie.


We're all just a couple of space monkeys.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 21
n7
Posted: December 30th, 2010, 8:06am Report to Moderator
Guest User



Just finished this, I was definitely impressed. After all the hoopla regarding this I was pleasantly surprised with how things panned out.

It wasn't exactly a laugh a minute as I had expected, but if you go into this with that perception you'll be be pleasantly surprised as how it plays out.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 13 - 21
DarrenJamesSeeley
Posted: December 30th, 2010, 7:36pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Michigan.USA
Posts
1522
Posts Per Day
0.31
I suspect it went over many people's heads. It's a guilty pleasure though. Some winks, laughs ...a nice diversion from the norm. Do I love it and jump up and down in giddy excitement as some of my peers here (and elsewhere) do? No. But it deserved a better fate last summer to be sure.



"I know you want to work for Mo Fuzz. And Mo Fuzz wants you to. But first, I'm going to need to you do something for me... on spec." - Mo Fuzz, Tapeheads, 1988
my scripts on ss : http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1095531482/s-45/#num48
The Art!http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-knowyou/m-1190561532/s-105/#num106
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 14 - 21
 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006