SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 25th, 2024, 5:15pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Movie Review - The Cottage Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 6 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    Movie Review - The Cottage  (currently 841 views)
RayW
Posted: September 27th, 2010, 4:03pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36


Writer/Director (ahem!) Paul Andrew Williams, noted writer/director and receiver of New Director's Award for his $90,000 film [1] London to Brighton in the 2006 Edinburgh International Film Festival [2], takes the money (nearly $4,000,000)[3][4] and runs in the opposite direction to shoot what looks like camp trash.

In a moment of frank honesty Willams states "Where can you go from [London to Brighton]? Honestly, there's nowhere you can go apart from down."[1]


And so indeed he does. As shooting of The Cottage progressed he could even tell the film crew was increasingly jittery over it prospects.

He says the first inkling came when he heard that the crew, who were all working for deferred fees, starting talking among themselves that they might make some money after all. They must be happy now. "Yeah, all those £4.60 cheques coming in."[1]




What did I think of The Cottage?


Standard horror fare, shot in classic British style (see above still shot) and utilizing acting in what I can only guess is a genetically ingrained stage performance style.




Top billed Andy Serkis, of LOTR Gollum fame, stands out amongst his cast mates as a fantastically miscast and underutilized performer. The other cast would be great for comedic stage play and in that they all performed well and provided an equal second-fiddle network behind Serkis. Although I remain impressed with Serkis' general movement, it is the depth of expressions of his facial features that captivate me the most. The man throws himself into his roles.

A very nice interview with Sirkis:
http://www.indielondon.co.uk/Film-Review/the-cottage-andy-serkis-interview
What a professional.
That's how you do it, considering what [indiscernible mumble] the film was.

The admittedly dark comedy horror film begins as a fairly legit drama before taking a bizarre left turn into horror schlock of typical, ridiculous behaviors. Why on earth would people on quests to save their hides or those of loved ones (even a stupid brother) stop and peruse the mementos of others, even those of a psycho a killer on an isolated country farm? At night. ESPECIALLY those of a psycho a killer on an isolated country farm at night!
(BTW, "The Cottage" part is only ACT I; ACTs II & III are at the psycho farm. Whatever.)

There is stabbing, an amputation, a half decapitation, full decapitations, decapitation including the spinal column (rolls eyes at grass in mouth), two impalements and general chasing about when common sense says you should get the h3ll out, which is what Williams did with the $4million.
ARRGH!!!


And there's some tits, too.

Cleavage really. Only. Don't get excited. There's nothing gratuitous in here. Prudes.

"And HOWWWWW are tits relevant to a SS review, Mr. Ray?"
I thought you'd never ask!

Note imdb.com's Fun Facts triva:
According to director Williams, Tracey was originally written as a 40-year-old character but, to get the finance, he was told to cast someone young.[5]

In other words - be open to and accept rewrites of significant characters.
Learn to let go of one thing to get another.

Comedies don't have to be tight as a beaver's bunghole, however, as far as dark comedy goes I much preferred the script and story of Simon Pegg's Shawn of the Dead[6]. I'm pretty sure Edgar Wright's and Simon Pegg's screenplay of that garnered the almost double production budget. The Cottage was just silly in an ill way.

As any good engineer will tell you, an analysis of failure can be nearly as helpful as an that of success. And here we have one.

SCREENWRITERS' NOTES OF THINGS NOT TO DO:
- Cute titles may get viewers in seats, but if the audience doesn't like the product it makes you look stupid if it doesn't match the story.
- One serious character ruins the barrel of several comedic characters. Sometimes "The Straight Guy" ain't workin'.
- Don't have your comedy "straight guy" waffle between straight and silly.
- If you're going to write comedy don't write 1/2 comedy. Pull out the stops.
- Don't have your protagonists conveniently drop their cell phones and wallets just to move the story along.
- Be careful that side stories, like two Asian hit men, don't go nowhere.
(Did I say that right? "Be careful that they don't go nowhere"? Yep. Said it right.)
- Perpetual humidity and fog make preserving a shed of heads impossible without significant and rapid decay. Nothing mummifies in English weather.
- Don't make your protagonists get mad at stupid people doing stupid things.
- You can't slam a pick ax into cobblestone even if you are Michael Meyers.
- You're going to need more than a butcher knife to remove a spinal column in a reasonable time frame.
- The "additional element(s)" reveal at the end is cheezy stupid.


Watch, deconstruct, analyze, have fun!






[1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/feb/29/3
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Andrew_Williams
[3] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465430/
[4] http://coinmill.com/GBP_USD.html#GBP=2500000
[5] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465430/
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shawn_of_the_Dead



Logged
Private Message
RRRocks
Posted: September 29th, 2010, 3:14pm Report to Moderator
New


Posts
15
Posts Per Day
0.00
I tried to watch this over the weekend and fell asleep so I guess I cant really drop and opinion but I did get it off comcast channel 1 as a free movie, maybe I'll try it again if it's still available.....The beginning was a little drab probably why I slept
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 3
dogglebe
Posted: September 29th, 2010, 4:02pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from RayW
Comedies don't have to be tight as a beaver's bunghole,




Well, that's a lovely image, Ray.  Thank you.


Phil
Logged
e-mail Reply: 2 - 3
RayW
Posted: September 29th, 2010, 4:10pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36
(big smiles!)

You're welcome, Phil.
Trying to find my writing style's ecological niche between overly descriptive and dry.

Every time I read someone's nebulous, old chestnut of "Tighten up that script" beavers come to mind.



Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 3
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006