SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 25th, 2024, 1:57pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  The Expendables Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 3 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    The Expendables  (currently 679 views)
RayW
Posted: January 23rd, 2011, 1:46am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Freedom

Location
About a thousand years from now.
Posts
1821
Posts Per Day
0.36
The Expendables



Production Budget    $ 82,000,000

Total US Gross         $103,068,524
International Gross   $148,000,000
Worldwide Gross       $251,068,524
http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/XPNDB.php

Reviews:
41% from Approved Tomatometer Critics
59% from the RT & Flixter Audience liked it
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_expendables/


The Movie
In the scope of contemporary film, THE EXPENDABLES is fair to poor.
In it's genre it is pretty good as long as you just like action, because the story itself, written by David Callahan, screenplay by Callahan and Stallone, is thin.
The action sequences are choreographed and filmed quite nice at a frenetic pace popular with the attention deficit viewing majority.
STUFF IS HAPPENING! IT'S HAPPENING FAST! IT MUST BE SO BAD@SS WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE IT!
Yawn.
But at least it's not shot in the high shutter speed style, lately overused.

The weapons displays are unfortunately weak. Mere suggestions of dangerous things.

The blood splatting special effects I recognized from Stallone's RAMBO. If you know what to look for, it's unique. I think they chop out a frame or two after each impact creating a distinct jarring-jump.
Seems he hooked up with the same SFX crew at WorldwideFX. Here's their demo reel for the film.
http://wwfx.net/reel.php

The editing in the church sequence was horrible. IDK WTH happened inside there. Stallone was there. Can't blame second unit.

The acting was pretty poor - for everyone. And I mean EVERYONE.
Some of it is just painful.

http://spill.com/Movie-Reviews/MovieReview.aspx?Name=The+Expendables&VideoId=474338
Dolf Lundgren actually is the "best" actor in the movie. LOL!

No. There ain't any token nudity, either.
D@mn cryin' shame.


Perfectly good waste of... talent.
Whatever.

Just... turn off your brain, ignore any semblance of a credible story or para-military sense, gloss over inter-personal relationship knowledge, accept that this teeters between comic book-to-movie and grindhouse fare, and just appreciate some runnin' and gunnin'.


The Blu-Ray/DVD Extras
Extras are pretty good, primarily Stallone's director commentary and the "making of" reel.
I have to give credit to Stallone that the guy gets work done. He's a role model for any screenwriter/director wannabes out there. His filmography ain't high art, but it provides entertainment and provides a fairly good return on his investment of money and effort.
He's McDonalds and Burger King and Dominoes all wrapped up together.

Listen to him talk.. He's a meat and taters guy that seems to know 80% of what's going on and uses his chutzpah and bravado to make up more than the difference.
He doesn't shoot a scene twenty times to "get it right". He choreographs it, practices it four times, shoots it a couple times and moves onto what's next.

There's a really nice bit in there about his acknowledgement of the difference between what's in the mind's eye and what the set, situation or budget will allow - "and you just deal with it, you know?"

A lot, a whole LOT, of the dialog and action is thrown in. I sh!t you not.
His own admission, multiple times.
His approach is that "There's the script. Okay. That's great."
Then there's the situation and the people.
The situation may suggest something that wasn't in the script - that's okay. He/they just had an idea, they try it.
Someone has an ad lib idea for some dialog - that's okay. They're given the freedom to try goofy stuff. Stallone don't care if it's great or not. He just wants to work with his friends from the business that he's known for thirty years or something and get this thing in the can.
He trusts them because he trusts himself, as a director.
Pirates code, all the way.
I like it.
It's nice.

When I listen to the director/producer commentary for PREDATORS and LAW ABIDING CITIZEN I cringe with contempt and disgust at their silliness.

When he describes about getting beat to h3ll performing the action sequences - and then we see the medical part - you understand that acting hurt isn't always acting.
For a 64yo guy, he's tough as hell.
Sh!t... he's tougher than most a third his age.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvester_Stallone#Injuries

He seems like a no-nonsense decent guy just doin' his thing with his friends.
Credit where due.

His acting still sux, though.

And I like the crow on top of the globe logo.







Revision History (2 edits; 1 reasons shown)
Nixon  -  March 9th, 2011, 2:46pm
Logged
Private Message
Dreamscale
Posted: March 9th, 2011, 11:17am Report to Moderator
Guest User



I really wanted to see this in the theater, but missed it.  I also looked very forward to seeing this on Blu Ray...

...and boy, was I ever underwhelmed.  I was just left feeling so empty, as nothing really stood out for me.  Too much giong on.  Too many recognizable faces.  Too many attempts at big sets and stunts.

The sum of all this was close to zero for me.  I didn't hate it at all, but I definitely didn't like it and remember almost nothing.

Huge disasappointment for me!!!!
Logged
e-mail Reply: 1 - 2
DarrenJamesSeeley
Posted: March 23rd, 2011, 7:23pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Michigan.USA
Posts
1522
Posts Per Day
0.31
When Dolph's Universal Soldier sequel (w/JC Van Damme) had low budget but more effective action, something needs to be said. I did like the Steve Austin-Randy Coutre smackdown and the Li-Lundgren rivalry though. The film to me was a mess. And folks, I LOVED Predators last year. But I wound up hating this film overall. It made The A Team look good.



"I know you want to work for Mo Fuzz. And Mo Fuzz wants you to. But first, I'm going to need to you do something for me... on spec." - Mo Fuzz, Tapeheads, 1988
my scripts on ss : http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1095531482/s-45/#num48
The Art!http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-knowyou/m-1190561532/s-105/#num106
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 2 - 2
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006