SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 25th, 2024, 6:07pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Wall Street Money Never Sleeps Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 13 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    Wall Street Money Never Sleeps  (currently 622 views)
Dreamscale
Posted: August 4th, 2011, 11:56am Report to Moderator
Guest User



Watched this last night.  Actually rewatched the original Wall Street on Netflix streaming Sunday, as it was the last day it was going to be available.

First of all, I was not impressed with the original (I saw it at the theater, years ago, when it was originally released, but not since).  I didn't dislike it, I just wasn't very impressed with any aspect of it.  Very by the numbers, cliched, unrealistic, unlikable characters.  I did like Michael Douglas' Gordon Gecko, though.  I just wish the film had taken him a bit further...revealed a little more of him.

As for the sequel?  $70 Million budget.  Weak, disappointing $52 Million NABO, $135 Million, respectable WWBO.  Definitely viewed as a big disappointment though.

I couldn't even get through it.  First time, I haven't finished a Netflix Blu-Ray...ever.  Is it that bad?  No, it's not bad, per se...it just wasn't my thang.  I was bored.  I didn't like the characters.  I didn't believe the setup and premise.  I didn't care what was going to happen.

I got through about an hour of the 2 hour and 7 minute runtime, and realized that was enough for me.
Logged
e-mail
Heretic
Posted: August 4th, 2011, 9:42pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts
2023
Posts Per Day
0.28
Haha I saw this movie third in a triple-feature day at the cinema.  I actually thought the first act was pretty neat -- I liked all of the stuff with Frank Langella -- but this quickly became mind-numbingly boring.

Great to see Michael Douglas up there doin' his thing, but the rest just didn't really seem to have anything interesting going on at all.

Jeff, if you had seen the third act...you would be a lot less happy with it than you are now.  Ha!  What a mess.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 1 - 6
Dreamscale
Posted: August 4th, 2011, 10:13pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Yeah, the first act was OK, but it started getting dull quick, and I didn't like or relate to Shia LeBeau'd character.  Glad I didn't slog through the last hour.

Thanks, Chris.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 2 - 6
The boy who could fly
Posted: August 5th, 2011, 2:43am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
British Columbia, Canada
Posts
1387
Posts Per Day
0.21
I guess I;m going to be in the minority here, i actually liked it, i liked michael douglas, i loved the cell phone bit at the start, i liked learning about something that for one, i don't find interesting, second, i don;t understand. Oliver Stone, by using visuals along with dialog, gave me at least a little bit of an understanding how things work, now I wouldn't pass a test, but i know a lot more now then i did before. I also thought Josh Brolin was a pretty good bad guy, so in the end something i thought was dull gave me some interest, and something i didn't understand made a little more sense, and on that the movie worked for me.


Logged
Private Message Windows Live Messenger Reply: 3 - 6
Scar Tissue Films
Posted: August 5th, 2011, 5:16am Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3382
Posts Per Day
0.63
Shia Leboef is one of the most difficults actors to watch I've ever come across.

He's like watching paint dry....got absolutely no charisma whatsoever. Can't begin to imagine how he's managed to get in so many films.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 6
Electric Dreamer
Posted: August 5th, 2011, 9:11am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Taking a long vacation from the holidays.

Location
Los Angeles
Posts
2740
Posts Per Day
0.55
A surprisingly soft and sappy message film follow up to the sharp original.
Turning Gordon Gekko into a sympathetic character sounds daring on paper.
But, if there's no one to be the charismatic antagonist in the sequel, it's a yawner.

It takes a lot to get me to sympathize with rich people, cuz they're friggin' rich!
Shia LeBouf can't carry the weight the emotional arc of this film requires of him,
I was invested while Langella was around, the fallen mentor role worked for me.

The drama couldn't mask the ham fistedness of Stone's personal agenda.
The clumsiness of the message about global economy was not well handled.
While Gekko as a good guy on paper sounds great, on film, not so much.

E.D.


LATEST NEWS

CineVita Films
is producing a short based on my new feature!

A list of my scripts can be found here.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 6
Ryan1
Posted: August 5th, 2011, 3:04pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Posts
1098
Posts Per Day
0.22
I agree with Rick on this point.  Shia LaBouf is pure poison to every film I've ever seen him in.  His mannerisms are grating, his voice is cringe-inducing and he seems to perform every scene in the same tone and emotional note.  Dude's got depth like a kiddie pool.  Shia LaBeof is no Charlie Sheen.  God, did I just say that?  

This movie really was a slog. I liked the Gekko character here, but knew he was not to be trusted, so his betrayal of Shia's character was about as surprising as the sun rising in the east.  The first Wall Street, IMO, dramatized and presented a compicated industry in a palatable and relatable way to the average filmgoer.  The story moved from the opening scene and was populated with much more interesting people, including the Terence Stamp character as Gekko's nemesis.    

This movie made no such attempt.  Are we really supposed to care about the nerdy professor and his energy project?  Ugh.  The script seemed to rely on Shia's character to explain everything that was going on.  And the romance with Gekko's daughter...better left unsaid.  That was really a bad idea.

This could have been interesting, given the present state of the stock market.  An 80's shark being released into new waters, but they went for sap over story.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 6
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006