SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is March 29th, 2024, 7:36am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)
One Week Challenge - Who Wrote What and Writers' Choice.


Scripts studios are posting for award consideration

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Prisoners Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 6 Guests

 Pages: 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Prisoners  (currently 2720 views)
nawazm11
Posted: December 1st, 2013, 7:13am Report to Moderator
Been Around



Posts
945
Posts Per Day
0.21
Surprised there isn't a thread for this. Will keep it short. Solid movie. The long runtime breezes by, a great mystery always keeps the viewer hooked. Powerhouse performance from Hugh Jackman, great performances from everybody actually. Paul Dano has always been a favourite of mine since There Will be Blood and Gyllenhaal's solidified himself as a solid actor. The film definitely has a Mystic River vibe going for it, simply put, if you enjoyed that (or basically any of Eastwood's later works), you'll like this.

I think this might be another blacklist script that's going to take home the Oscar. But it's not really the most appealing movie to a general audience. Confronting for the most part but it works. There's this technique used by Guzikowski where he likes to cut right before a major reveal, really makes for edge of the seat viewing. Will be nice to see how this pans out, awards season has just begun.
Logged
Private Message
Dreamscale
Posted: December 3rd, 2013, 1:19pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



I thought I already reviewed this, as I saw it at the theater a few weeks ago.

I wasn't very pleased with what I saw, adn I was surprised, because the trailers looked so damn good.

IMO, it was way too long, way too plodding and slow, way too dark, and in the end, a bit obvious and also unbeleivable in the finale.

And, it's funny, because I like long movies, I like slow movies, and I love dark violent movies.  This was just too much in all the above, mostly in the dark tone, with literally no humor, no smiles, not nothing other than sheer mean sprited, dark shit.

Now, don't get me wrong, I definitely didn't hate or even dislike this, but I definitely didn't love it either.  I was hoping for more...and less, I guess.

Grade - B-/C+
Logged
e-mail Reply: 1 - 15
DV44
Posted: December 3rd, 2013, 5:59pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
California
Posts
510
Posts Per Day
0.12
I really enjoyed the movie. Hugh Jackman, Paul Dano, Jake Gyllenhaal, in fact the whole cast did a unbelievable job in creating a suspenseful atmophere. Hands down my favorite film of the year.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 15
Takeshi
Posted: December 4th, 2013, 5:52am Report to Moderator
Guest User



I had a strange experience with this one. I was a little distracted because a woman who was sitting near me in the cinema brought her two primary school aged children along with her and every time something particularly disturbing happened I couldn't help but think "fancy bringing kids along to see this". Apart from that I found the movie fairly entertaining but it's not what I'd call memorable. It's the kind of film that entertains but doesn't really stay with you and it's not the kind of film I'd bother watching again.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 3 - 15
Neighbour
Posted: December 4th, 2013, 8:44pm Report to Moderator
New


Seb Archer

Location
The Wasteland
Posts
109
Posts Per Day
0.03
I had higher expectations as well, but still think it deserves some Oscar attention. I'm surprised I didn't start this thread myself, as I saw the day it came out and really liked it.

I was more impressed by Gyllenhal and Jackman's performances. I thought the best written thing in the movie, was the Loki (Gyllenhal) character, but then I read the script and realized that a lot the little things that made that character so great, weren't written into the script.

I feel like both actors deserve the Oscar nod, especially Gyllenhal.


A bad writer, trying to become decent...

Thank you for all who put up with my work and try and help me improve.

Practice will hopefully pay off for my writing.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 15
sniper
Posted: December 12th, 2013, 4:32pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


My UZI Weighs A Ton

Location
Northern Hemisphere
Posts
2249
Posts Per Day
0.48
This movie surprised the hell out of me. I'm no big Jackman or Gyllenhaal fan but - damn! - they were excellent, especially Gyllenhaal (funny little quirk his character had with those blinking eyes). Overall I thought this was a very enjoyable film that had me on the edge of my seat all the way through. Powerful performances all around. Only thing that bothered me was the fact that Loki didn't connect Bobby's drawing and the necklace he finds on the guy in the basement quicker.

I doubt the movie gets an oscar nod which is a shame because it clearly deserves it. The best movie I've seen so far in 2013.


Down in the hole / Jesus tries to crack a smile / Beneath another shovel load
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 15
Neighbour
Posted: December 12th, 2013, 5:28pm Report to Moderator
New


Seb Archer

Location
The Wasteland
Posts
109
Posts Per Day
0.03

Quoted from sniper
This movie surprised the hell out of me. I'm no big Jackman or Gyllenhaal fan but - damn! - they were excellent, especially Gyllenhaal (funny little quirk his character had with those blinking eyes). Overall I thought this was a very enjoyable film that had me on the edge of my seat all the way through. Powerful performances all around. Only thing that bothered me was the fact that Loki didn't connect Bobby's drawing and the necklace he finds on the guy in the basement quicker.

I doubt the movie gets an oscar nod which is a shame because it clearly deserves it. The best movie I've seen so far in 2013.


Yeah it's funny because he does notice in the movie that he should have made that connection. He makes a "holy shit, how could I not see that face?" when he looks at the picture in the aunt's house.


A bad writer, trying to become decent...

Thank you for all who put up with my work and try and help me improve.

Practice will hopefully pay off for my writing.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 15
Andrew
Posted: December 13th, 2013, 1:29am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Posts
1791
Posts Per Day
0.32
Definitely a fan of this one. The only real gripe that hung over me whilst watching, was it felt like the director was attempting to craft a Fincher movie, and no one but Fincher should attempt that.

As Snipes said, Gyllenhaal was very, very good, but unlike Snipes, I'm not surprised - this guy is the real deal.

Undoubtedly in my top films of the year.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 15
DustinBowcot
Posted: December 13th, 2013, 2:44am Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from Dreamscale
... with literally no humor, no smiles, not nothing other than sheer mean sprited, dark shit.


Sounds like my kind of film.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 8 - 15
Dreamscale
Posted: December 13th, 2013, 9:49am Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from DustinBowcot
Sounds like my kind of film.


I love dark, mean spirited, play for keeps movies, but this thing was just unrelenting to me.  Even the weather and locale were dark and crappy.

I guess I prefer a smirk or smile as a dagger is being thrust in every now and then.

Logged
e-mail Reply: 9 - 15
Mr. Blonde
Posted: December 13th, 2013, 10:06am Report to Moderator
Administrator


What good are choices if they're all bad?

Location
Nowhere special.
Posts
3064
Posts Per Day
0.57
The movie was fine--not anything special--and you could kind of see the ending coming a mile away. The performances were actually mediocre, considering everyone involved's acting abilities and the movie did go on forever. No way they couldn't have trimmed 20 minutes off of it. Like I said, it was fine, not great, but also not the worst thing in the world.

As for Jake Gyllenhaal's blinking, that got annoying so quickly. In fact, it was the worst blinking since Nicolas Cage.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 15
Dreamscale
Posted: December 13th, 2013, 1:07pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Agree with Mr. Blonde completely.

Definitely not a bad movie, but not nearly as good as others are making it out to be or as good as it should have/could have been.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 11 - 15
Neighbour
Posted: December 13th, 2013, 1:57pm Report to Moderator
New


Seb Archer

Location
The Wasteland
Posts
109
Posts Per Day
0.03
I think everything was pretty excellent up until the ending to be honest. The aunt's dialogue was ridiculously exposition. The things she was saying were so unrealistic.


A bad writer, trying to become decent...

Thank you for all who put up with my work and try and help me improve.

Practice will hopefully pay off for my writing.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 15
James McClung
Posted: January 25th, 2014, 8:07pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.49
Checked this out. Wanted to see what all the fuss is about.

Solid flick. Effective meat and potatoes thriller with some *slight* innovations. I appreciated the dark tone, non-cathartic use of violence, and the scenery. All the picturesque suburbia set against grey skies and dead trees and drenched in rain really set the scene for me.

Not a Hugh Jackman fan but I've always had faith in his ability. He's just so rarely done anything I'd want to see. Still, I didn't expect such an against-type powerhouse performance. While the character archetype is familiar and inherently sympathetic, Jackman's performance and the way he's written totally go against the grain and constantly challenge the audience's sympathy. I feel like grieving father characters are a dime a dozen so I appreciated this interpretation. Much more complex and interesting.

I liked his fate as well. Quite harsh but without a doubt the right way to go as it immediately connects to one of the first things he says in the film, which is essentially the crux of his character.

Gyllenhaal, I didn't have the same faith in. Always thought he was too babyfaced and nebbishy to play characters like these. But I was equally impressed with his performance. A lot more laid back and nuanced than his usual fair, I'd say, and while the character is essentially underwritten, he brings so many little things to the table that give the air there's some kind of dark past or neurosis to this guy buried underneath. He's also an excellent counterpart for Jackman and the two of them together create an interesting dynamic to the film.

Paul Dano, also not a fan. Also did a fantastic job. I'm coming around to him though. He seems to be coming into his own as late, especially with films like Looper and 12 Years A Slave. Honestly, I'm starting to think all these younger actors and actresses just need some time (and the right roles) to hone their craft and not everyone's talent is as immediately obvious as others.

Now... Oscar calibar? Nah. Really?

I feel like even if they got rid of half the films nominated this year, this one would *maybe* have a shot. In any category. I mean, there were a lot of great films last year and plenty that didn't get any Oscar attention.

Still, I was impressed. Definitely one of the better films of 2013.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 13 - 15
nawazm11
Posted: January 25th, 2014, 8:26pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Posts
945
Posts Per Day
0.21

Quoted from James McClung


Now... Oscar calibar? Nah. Really?

I feel like even if they got rid of half the films nominated this year, this one would *maybe* have a shot. In any category. I mean, there were a lot of great films last year and plenty that didn't get any Oscar attention.

Still, I was impressed. Definitely one of the better films of 2013.


Yeah, that was bad judgement by me. A little too dark and bleak I think. Considering the other Oscar-bait films that didn't get nominated, Prisoners didn't have a huge chance.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 15
Demento
Posted: January 25th, 2014, 10:22pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Posts
946
Posts Per Day
0.25
The biggest accomplishment of the film in my opinion is that it somehow moves fast, yet not much really happens.

The story was pretty basic but effective. I didn't like the twist.

Ok movie, nothing to write home about but good.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 15 - 15
 Pages: 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006