All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
A little rough around the edges but a nice little spooky story. Just a couple nits: - We can assume that the family's last name is Carroll? - How would we know that Natalie got her Grandmother's strawberry blonde hair? - Ext. Natalie's Room should be Int. Hallway, perhaps? - Some of the dialog is OTN and awkward.
Those are just minor details that are easily fixed. Good little short.
Some nice tension and scares. I'm in two minds about this one. I enjoyed it, but there's no real logic, theme, deeper meaning or irony to it. It's just kind of creepy stuff happening.
So far, this would be the lest visually appealing comic. I think this is way more suited to a short film. It has pretty standard horror beats, nothing too original.
I didn’t mind it for what it was, but I think it misses the mark in terms of the challenge and the end goal of said challenge.
Opening Slug - CARROLL'S HOUSE - I like that you are being exact in your setting, but when you intro your characters, you need to use the last name, otherwise "CARROLL'S HOUSE" doesn't mean anything. Know what I'm saying?
"her grandmother's strawberry blonde hair" - WTF? Did I miss something? Who's the grandmother and why is she being referenced here in a description of a kid's hair? This entire passage is a mess...incomplete fragment, followed by another fragment, and adding in "her favorite cartoons" is totally unfilmable.
Final passage under this Slug is totally incorrect, as Jamie and Natalie are in the kitchen and this scene is continuous. And, I guess you're telling us that the living room is off the kitchen, and the front door is part of the living room?
But then we have a new Slug, and it's entry way, so maybe the living room is off the entry way? Hmmm, now Natalie is at the front door also?
A taxi? WTF? Things just aren't working or making sense here to me, but alot of that is because you never set your scenes properly.
You always need a comma in dialogue,to offset a name or anything being used as a name.
Page 4 - "BACK TO SCENE" - Huh? When did we leave the scene. You used "DREAM" in your Slug, which to me is a mistake, but since you did it this way, you're saying the entire scene is a dream, so this is a messed up here.
EXT. NATALIE'S ROOM" - HUH? WTF? Incorrect.
Keeping a blank page at the end of the script looks very poor.
OK, the end. I don't see creature feature here at all. I don't see much of anything actually. It's dull, uneventful and really doesn't give us anything to go on.
The Monster Under the Bed and In the Bed at the same time has been used extensively, so this wasn’t really original but that would have been okay if the rest of the script was solid and (for me anyway) it wasn’t and needs a lot of work.
The setup took way too long. The drunken mom clumsily handing over her child for the sleepover was actually quite entertaining but this would suit a much longer short, or feature, where the setup would pay off in some way later on. Here it doesn’t and you could start much later with the actual sleepover without losing any of the story.
Towards the end I lost track of which character was which. You just need to work on making each one distinctive and stand out.
I wasn’t quite sure who was hanging at the end or what Billy had to do with all this, unless that was Billy? That bit needs to be clearer.
For more of my scripts, stories, produced movies and the ocassional blog, check out my new website. CLICK
Had a few creepy moments. Felt a bit disconnected with all that time spent giving Sarah a backstory but then the focus seems to be more on the parents.
You set her up as this aloof, wounded girl with a messed up mom. I'd like that to tie into this monster somehow... maybe she's developed some sort of Sixth Sense ability... which might be what you're going for with the drawing predicting the ending...
That was a creepy drawing. Some good stuff overall just lacking a clear direction.
I thought that the first scene needs some refining as their talk is a bit on the nose. You couls show Natalie talk to Jamie maybe - and we could learn the fact she's scared at nights.
Jamie sure is strange. Why would she talk to Sissy through clenched teeth. And then she banged her head repeatedly? She can bang it once or twice I think.
You created the tension very well. I was interested to see how it ends.
But I didn't understand what happened. What's the relevance of the man that hangs from the tree? I know he's at first featured in Sarah's drawing but I didn't understand what's with him and why.
So what happened to Sarah? She's another monster? Natalie seen the monsters under her bed before but Sarah looks like a real one. Then Billy - i don't know what happened to him.
I guess it's over my head. Nice tention though, I think all you need is to work on clarity.
Does Jamie have mental heath issues? OCPD?ADHD, ? Bipolar? Something? Why is she banging her head repeatedly on the door? Why does she speak through clenched teeth?
Two girls coloring so hard not one crayon snaps. Drawing so loud...what are they writing on? Sandpaper? And look at that detail---stick figures!
First, the format mistake everyone probably caught: Page 4 EXT. NATALIE’S ROOM - CONTINUOUS Should probably read something like: “INT. HALLWAY - CONTINUOUS She puts her head to Natalie’s door
What happened to Sarah? She just disappeared. Was there ever really a Sarah? Is Jamie the monster in Natalie’s imagination? Or is Natalie the monster? I ask this because in the drawing, there’s a shadowy figure under the bed, and Jamie finds Natalie under the bed. Which monster killed Billy?
This script may be too subtle for me. A little more clarity would be appreciated by my aging brain.
This was a spooky one, with some nice tension and a few pleasant scares, but less visual and suited for comic than others. The characters are well-defined and the writing is good but the end needs work to tie better with the rest of the story. It left me scratching my head. What’s the relation between Sarah and the Monster? How the hanged man (Bill maybe?) ended there?
Is this one a little open for interpretation? If so, no problem and kudos for going that route, because those types often get crucified.
Some little format issues, but nothing to really speak of.
It's a dark scenario with a classic 'search the monster under the bed vibe' that I enjoyed.
Not sure about the comic thing though. I see this more in the usual short circus. Perhaps it needs a last push to reach its full potential. However, good effort all in all.
A lot of unnecessary talking. The exposition isn't done terribly. I think you almost nailed it but there is still something left behind that lets the reader/viewer know they are being spoon fed.
Code
Sissy turns and walks towards the waiting taxi. Sarah steps
past Jamie and follows Natalie into the house.
This is very lazy writing. Maybe you didn't have time for an edit.. but you should always have time to edit lazy sentences. In the initial draft, it's normal to see stuff like this because we just want/need/must splurge it all out... and taking time over making things pretty should not be on the agenda. However, that initial draft is not done until those sentences have been cleaned up on the second look over.
Why is she banging her head on the door? And this is normal? The guy's talking to her like it is. This is copied from some bad 50s show or something.