SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is March 28th, 2024, 5:39pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)
One Week Challenge - Who Wrote What and Writers' Choice.


Scripts studios are posting for award consideration

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Screenwriting Discussion    Screenwriting Class  ›  (O.S.) Question Moderators: George Willson
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 5 Guests

 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print
  Author    (O.S.) Question  (currently 1589 views)
Zack
Posted: February 7th, 2017, 7:39pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Erlanger, KY
Posts
4487
Posts Per Day
0.69
If something happens over black, such as a knock on a door, should it be followed with O.S.?

Example-

BLACK

A door bell RINGS (O.S.).

FADE IN:

Is that correct?

~Zack~
Logged
Private Message
AnthonyCawood
Posted: February 7th, 2017, 8:18pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
UK
Posts
4319
Posts Per Day
1.14
Personally I think the OS is implied because it's over black, and I would use OVER BLACK...

So my version would be

OVER BLACK

A door bell RINGS.

FADE IN:

But it is just down to preference and making sure the script is clear, and I think yours is.


Anthony Cawood - Award winning screenwriter
Available Short screenplays - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/short-scripts
Available Feature screenplays - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/feature-film-scripts/
Screenwriting articles - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/articles
IMDB Link - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6495672/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 1 - 15
Zack
Posted: February 7th, 2017, 8:25pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Erlanger, KY
Posts
4487
Posts Per Day
0.69
Thanks for the reply and advice. Are the () needed? I've seen O.S. both with and without them.

~Zack~
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 15
eldave1
Posted: February 7th, 2017, 8:33pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Southern California
Posts
6874
Posts Per Day
1.95
Concur


My Scripts can all be seen here:

http://dlambertson.wix.com/scripts
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 15
AnthonyCawood
Posted: February 7th, 2017, 8:34pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
UK
Posts
4319
Posts Per Day
1.14
Most screenwriting software defaults to the ( ) so I always use them


Anthony Cawood - Award winning screenwriter
Available Short screenplays - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/short-scripts
Available Feature screenplays - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/feature-film-scripts/
Screenwriting articles - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/articles
IMDB Link - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6495672/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 4 - 15
ReaperCreeper
Posted: February 23rd, 2017, 4:55pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Wisconsin
Posts
974
Posts Per Day
0.15
Writing on spec, the example in the post is a bit overly complicated. You can just do something like:

"A doorbell rings over blackness."
or
"Over blackness, a doorbell rings."

Or something like that.

I get why these questions pop up, though: people force and pressure budding writers to always begin a screenplay with "FADE IN"

Fact is, though, that simply doesn't apply to every story.

--Julio
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 15
RegularJohn
Posted: February 23rd, 2017, 6:17pm Report to Moderator
New


Every 23 months for 23 days, Johnny writes.

Posts
276
Posts Per Day
0.07
I've only ever seen the (O.S.) in dialogue.  I think it's better to maneuver the action lines around though I can't remember a scene where a noise was made O.S. in the action lines themselves.  The way Anthony wrote it looks good I think.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 15
TonyDionisio
Posted: February 23rd, 2017, 10:49pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


Damnit, get to the point!

Location
Tennessee
Posts
768
Posts Per Day
0.20
O.S. Means off screen for dialogue, however, the character speaking does exist around the camera shot, just hasn't been introduced recently.

V.O. Is basically an omnipotent character watching the same scene as the audience does, yet provides some knowledge or insight. A God voice.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 7 - 15
Bogey
Posted: February 24th, 2017, 12:45pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
The Chair
Posts
232
Posts Per Day
0.06
I treat (V.O.) as a dialogue voice that's simply not in the exact location as the scene. For example, Joe is engaged in a telephone conversation with Jane. If we're watching Joe in the scene, but hearing Jane's voice, Jane's dialogue would be depicted as (V.O.).

Same example, Joe and Jane talk via phone, and unbeknownst to Joe, Jane is close by, and by the end of the conversation she stands in an open doorway to the same room he's sitting in. She says, "Turn around". I treat that as a (O.S.) because she's in Joe's scene location, but we haven't seen her yet.

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 15
eldave1
Posted: February 24th, 2017, 6:56pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Southern California
Posts
6874
Posts Per Day
1.95

Quoted from Bogey
I treat (V.O.) as a dialogue voice that's simply not in the exact location as the scene. For example, Joe is engaged in a telephone conversation with Jane. If we're watching Joe in the scene, but hearing Jane's voice, Jane's dialogue would be depicted as (V.O.).

Same example, Joe and Jane talk via phone, and unbeknownst to Joe, Jane is close by, and by the end of the conversation she stands in an open doorway to the same room he's sitting in. She says, "Turn around". I treat that as a (O.S.) because she's in Joe's scene location, but we haven't seen her yet.



correct


My Scripts can all be seen here:

http://dlambertson.wix.com/scripts
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 15
TonyDionisio
Posted: February 24th, 2017, 10:34pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


Damnit, get to the point!

Location
Tennessee
Posts
768
Posts Per Day
0.20
I disagree. A telephone call is O.S. It occurs off of the screen. The crowd assumes that the unseen voice is originating at the same time as the on screen caller. They are just not being shown in the same scene location.

A V.O. is being artificially added over the present scene. It usually has knowledge that the people currently on the screen may not have and it can even be the voice of the person currently on the screen as well. If it doesn't add some dimensional layer to what we see on the screen, then what good is it? I'm sure there can be exceptions like most anything.

Say 1 guy is calling down a deep, dark well to another guy somewhere at the bottom, who has fallen in and needs help. We can't see the other bottom guy, but can hear his voice from the well, so he is O.S. The guy at the top is seen, so he is not O.S. Now add in that the guy not seen also comments directly to the audience, something like this:

       Guy at bottom (?.?.)
Look at this shit I got myself in. Guy
at the top ain't doing shit to help me out.

So the above would be V.O.   I.M.O., while the calls for help from the same bottom guy, in real time, would be O.S.

This make sense?
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 10 - 15
RegularJohn
Posted: February 24th, 2017, 11:21pm Report to Moderator
New


Every 23 months for 23 days, Johnny writes.

Posts
276
Posts Per Day
0.07
I'm with Tony on this.  The main difference between O.S. and V.O. is reaction or lack thereof.  Phone calls would be O.S. because despite the other character technically being off screen, they're still eliciting a reaction or impacting the scene in some aspect.  Voice overs are basically there for the audience or monologues of a particular characters.  In both scenarios, the scene is unaffected.  You could take out the voice over and the scene itself will remain unchanged though I'm sure there are rare, special cases in which they do.

That's my take on it.  I've only used voice overs with narrators or inner thoughts of characters.  Every other time it's been off screen where appropriate.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 15
eldave1
Posted: February 25th, 2017, 12:39am Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Southern California
Posts
6874
Posts Per Day
1.95

Quoted from TonyDionisio
I disagree. A telephone call is O.S. It occurs off of the screen. The crowd assumes that the unseen voice is originating at the same time as the on screen caller. They are just not being shown in the same scene location.

A V.O. is being artificially added over the present scene. It usually has knowledge that the people currently on the screen may not have and it can even be the voice of the person currently on the screen as well. If it doesn't add some dimensional layer to what we see on the screen, then what good is it? I'm sure there can be exceptions like most anything.

Say 1 guy is calling down a deep, dark well to another guy somewhere at the bottom, who has fallen in and needs help. We can't see the other bottom guy, but can hear his voice from the well, so he is O.S. The guy at the top is seen, so he is not O.S. Now add in that the guy not seen also comments directly to the audience, something like this:

       Guy at bottom (?.?.)
Look at this shit I got myself in. Guy
at the top ain't doing shit to help me out.

So the above would be V.O.   I.M.O., while the calls for help from the same bottom guy, in real time, would be O.S.

This make sense?


No. Here is a good explanation from Trottier:

====================================================
QUESTION

I was once told that the use of (O.S.) for a character on the phone is incorrect when writing a spec script. I was told to use this instead:

                      MITCH (on phone)
        What are you doing?

                      JANICE (O.S., ON PHONE)
        Oh...just painting my toe nails.

ANSWER

You’ve been misinformed. The use of (O.S.) is incorrect because (O.S.) stands for OFF SCREEN, meaning that the character is in the scene (at the scene location), but cannot be seen on the silver screen. When a character is not at the scene location, then use (V.O.) for VOICE OVER, and that's the case for a voice coming through a phone.

In the case of your example, I assume that we can see Mitch, but that Janice is at some other location and that we hear her voice but don't see her. In that case, this would be correct:

Mitch holds the phone with one hand while the other hand clips his toenails.

                      MITCH
        What are you doing?

                      JANICE (V.O.)
        Oh...just painting my toe nails
======================================================

The phone call is not at the location so they cannot be off screen at that location - hence - VO.

All that being said, there is no difference really in O.S versus O.C. One of them should go and be replaced with something like O.L (other location). That would they allow V.O to solely be used in the manner recommended by Tony. e.g., phone calls and such would be O.L


My Scripts can all be seen here:

http://dlambertson.wix.com/scripts

Revision History (1 edits)
eldave1  -  February 25th, 2017, 12:05pm
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 15
ReaperCreeper
Posted: March 3rd, 2017, 4:52pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Wisconsin
Posts
974
Posts Per Day
0.15
For what it's worth, the most common way I've seen phone conversations done professionally is:
CHARACTER (V.O.)
(filtered)
Blah, blah, blah.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 15
eldave1
Posted: March 3rd, 2017, 5:40pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Southern California
Posts
6874
Posts Per Day
1.95

Quoted from ReaperCreeper
For what it's worth, the most common way I've seen phone conversations done professionally is:
CHARACTER (V.O.)
(filtered)
Blah, blah, blah.


yep


My Scripts can all be seen here:

http://dlambertson.wix.com/scripts
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 15
 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Screenwriting Class  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006