All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Okay so I'm just cleaning up an old short and I'm hit with a dilemma that had me scratching my head when I first wrote the darn thing lol. The script is a non-linear piece and I opted to not include 'flashback' in the slugs, as I wanted the reader to work it out for themselves...which most did. However I'm now torn as to whether I should include 'flashback' to make it more easy to follow. Any thoughts anyone? Is it wrong not to?
Check out my scripts...if you want to, no pressure.
I think it's definitely "wrong" not to use a FLASHBACK when you are flashing back.
And, I wouldn't add it in the Slug...do it with "BEGIN FLASHBACK", then "END FLASHBACK". This way, you can incorporate multiple scenes/Slugs/etc in each Flashback.
I did that once - not using a flashback, and peeps got it regardless. My reasoning was I didn't want to interrupt the flow of the script. In that case it becomes more about the writing and how you handle those transitions. If you think you can get away with it, then why not? Technically, for the most part, we all know the rules. I follow them mostly. In that one instance I didn't and I'm cool with that.
Perfect. Thanks Jeff. I didn't know you were into writing fantasy. Thought you were more of a horror guy. Well, perhaps horror for the girl whose ass you were staring at.
Whatever makes it more likely for someone to read the script and think it would be a good film to make.
If the confusion from not having flash indicated makes it less likely, then it's best to have it there.
If the format challenges the reader the way the film is meant to challenge an audience, and you think this makes a director more likely to choose your script, then don't use the flash.
Go with your instinct.
Only thing that matters is winning over a producer or director.
If the format challenges the reader the way the film is meant to challenge an audience, and you think this makes a director more likely to choose your script, then don't use the flash.
This was my thinking. When it was posted, the readers all seemed to follow it so I might just leave it.
Check out my scripts...if you want to, no pressure.
All that matters, Alffy, is getting someone excited reading your story excited about making it or seeing it made. The rest is just trimmings for writers to argue over.
This is where the rubber meets the road for me when it comes to "rules". In prose, they say that with the best writing the words disappear. The reader doesn't see them. In other words, we see and feel the story, not the words.
Since a spec script has to sell itself to someone, why would the principle be different?
Part of feeling a story is suspense. And that can be created in the way the story is written. That's important for making the reader feel the story. But sometimes a strict interpretation of rules limits the opportunity to create the suspense, for example by saying we need to intro the character by name right away. What's more important, a rule that has no impact on making a reader love your story, or actually making the reader feel the story as he reads it?
So I'm just saying you are a veteran writer, you should feel free to call it the way you see it.