SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 25th, 2024, 5:50am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Unproduced Screenplay Discussion    Short Horror  ›  Good Things Come...
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 4 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Good Things Come...  (currently 4948 views)
James McClung
Posted: January 26th, 2014, 10:59pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48
New draft is up. The material's about the same but the script is two pages shorter. I also removed a few lines here and there that did not affect the page count but will contribute to a breezier read regardless. Hopefully this one is a little easier going down.

Been thinking about it and I agree that there needs to be a little more dynamics between the two characters. Indeed, Felix's arc is too steady and easy.

I've been trying to work on incorporating the monsters more into the story so it's not just two guys talking the whole time but that's proving sort of difficult at the moment. The idea is that the monsters are actually the trees so it's not like they can get up and run after these guys (at least not without making a huge racket). I'm toying with the idea of the guys maybe hooking some body parts in the water and freaking out but not to the point that they'd freak out and leave immediately, which seems to be the most logical thing to do, really.

Rewriting my OWC entry (which I didn't enter) at the moment but hoping to come back to this one at some point after with a better sense of direction.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 15 - 27
Guest
Posted: January 27th, 2014, 1:30pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


Posts
712
Posts Per Day
0.14
Nice new draft.  Definitely breezier, Jimmy.

I like the exchanges between Felix/Gideon this time around.  Feels like there's a point to their dialogue.

I can tell you have tried incorporating the dread more.  It's noticeable.

You should definitely go with the idea of one of the guys reeling in a body part.  How nuts would that be?  


--Steve
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 16 - 27
EWall433
Posted: January 29th, 2014, 11:52am Report to Moderator
New



Posts
423
Posts Per Day
0.11
Hey James,

I checked this out before the OWC, but held off posting for the new draft.

I might not have mentioned it at first, but something about your opening passage tripped my brain up both times. I think it happens here:

“She stops, stuffs it in her sweats’ pocket, and returns to her jog.”

At this point I wasn’t quite sure where she was in relation to the tree. Right next to it? A few paces off? But the line skipped over both of those questions and the bill just appeared in her hand. Other than that niggle, the writing was good though.

You did a good job condensing the opening dialogue, but there are two further suggestions I would make.

1) I think the fortune cookie bit should come at the end of the scene instead of the beginning. I’d be more impactful to have those fortunes be the very last note played before we switch to the forest.

2) I found it interesting that you said the whole story originally took place at the lake, because my initial thought is all of this set-up could be handled in the SUV on the way to the lake. You can have them eating Chinese and smoking weed in the SUV. I get the impression they are a little slobbish, you could transplant that mess to the backseat of the car. And finally you have him on the computer, which spurs dialogue about his job. In the SUV, he could be checking his email for responses to his applications by using his phone. This could prompt him to express similar doubts as to whether he should even be on this trip.

I thought the kills were well drawn, and the monster guzzling beer is funny twist, but to me their actions don’t seem bad enough to warrant their comeuppance (even in a ‘movie-morality’ type way).

Cause it sounds like Felix has applied to a bunch of places. It sounds like he has been pretty worried and doing something about it. And all he’s really done is spent one day going fishing while he waits to hear from the places he’s applied to. The guy can’t have one day of fishing until he gets a new job?

To be honest, with a dollar bill being used as bait, I would’ve pinned the likely theme as greed. Maybe you didn’t want to go the easy route, but I think that image is going to have a hard time being effective in a context outside of greed. So what might this look like if we succumb to that?

Maybe Felix and Gideon aren’t just out there to fish. Maybe they are waiting for some people (or a person) they are supposed to sell drugs to. Or maybe Felix has arranged this so he can make rent, but Gideon has no idea about it. Let’s say that Felix knows this buyer is staying in a cabin in the woods and after the day passes with no one showing up, Felix decides to drag himself and Gideon deeper into the woods to find him.

I think this would better earn Felix’s fate. I’d have a much clearer sense of how Felix’s impatience contributed to his death, and as for Gideon…well, shit happens.

Anyway, just spitballin’ here. I like the ‘unseen creature’ angle and I wouldn’t really need much more from that aspect of the story. Others might disagree.

Good luck with it,
Eric
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 17 - 27
James McClung
Posted: January 30th, 2014, 3:46pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48

Quoted from Guest
Nice new draft.  Definitely breezier, Jimmy.

I like the exchanges between Felix/Gideon this time around.  Feels like there's a point to their dialogue.

I can tell you have tried incorporating the dread more.  It's noticeable.

You should definitely go with the idea of one of the guys reeling in a body part.  How nuts would that be?  


--Steve


Thanks, man.

I did make a few small embellishments but you'd be surprised how little was actually *added* to this draft. Honestly, I think condensing the writing, especially the dialogue, allowed the horror elements to breath and stand out more. Either way, I think I've struck the proper pace this time around or am at least getting close.

Indeed, I've come up with some ideas for incorporating (a few) more body parts in the next draft. They're subtle but I think they'll work quite nicely and don't require any major upsets that would throw the story off course. I think if I can pull them off, they'll ratchet up the tension even more and ultimately add some more flavor and fun to the story. My aim is to do so whilst still keeping the budget and page length around where it is now.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 18 - 27
James McClung
Posted: January 30th, 2014, 4:04pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48
Thanks for the read, Eric.


Quoted from EWall433
I might not have mentioned it at first, but something about your opening passage tripped my brain up both times. I think it happens here:

“She stops, stuffs it in her sweats’ pocket, and returns to her jog.”

At this point I wasn’t quite sure where she was in relation to the tree. Right next to it? A few paces off? But the line skipped over both of those questions and the bill just appeared in her hand. Other than that niggle, the writing was good though.


"She stops by the tree, stuffs the bill in her pocket, and returns to her jog."

How's that sound?


Quoted from EWall433
1) I think the fortune cookie bit should come at the end of the scene instead of the beginning. I’d be more impactful to have those fortunes be the very last note played before we switch to the forest.


I don't know. Wouldn't that sort of come out of nowhere? I'll think it over, I suppose, but people seem to like having that information when the ending comes around. I also think the beer wraps things up in a nice succinct way.


Quoted from EWall433
2) I found it interesting that you said the whole story originally took place at the lake, because my initial thought is all of this set-up could be handled in the SUV on the way to the lake. You can have them eating Chinese and smoking weed in the SUV. I get the impression they are a little slobbish, you could transplant that mess to the backseat of the car. And finally you have him on the computer, which spurs dialogue about his job. In the SUV, he could be checking his email for responses to his applications by using his phone. This could prompt him to express similar doubts as to whether he should even be on this trip.


Will consider. I mean, obviously, they can't have the conversation they have now in the SUV. That is to say they can't argue the merits of going to the lake *whilst* going to the lake. But perhaps a few tweaks here and there could kick off the story a little faster and more to the point. Let me mull it over a little bit.


Quoted from EWall433
I thought the kills were well drawn, and the monster guzzling beer is funny twist, but to me their actions don’t seem bad enough to warrant their comeuppance (even in a ‘movie-morality’ type way).

Cause it sounds like Felix has applied to a bunch of places. It sounds like he has been pretty worried and doing something about it. And all he’s really done is spent one day going fishing while he waits to hear from the places he’s applied to. The guy can’t have one day of fishing until he gets a new job?


The idea wasn't so much that Felix is punished for taking a day off. Rather that he's punished for adopting Gideon's way of thinking, which is always trying to get something for nothing. I agree, it's a stretch. But I think the tone's too light to really be damning Felix's character all that much in that regard. There are still the elements of "shit happens" and "wrong place at the wrong time" that play into Felix's fate as well.


Quoted from EWall433
To be honest, with a dollar bill being used as bait, I would’ve pinned the likely theme as greed. Maybe you didn’t want to go the easy route, but I think that image is going to have a hard time being effective in a context outside of greed. So what might this look like if we succumb to that?


Greed was definitely the main concept for Michael's anthology and the jumping off for this story. But like I said earlier, I sort of drifted away from it slightly through the development process. I think what the two characters display here is a type of greed, albeit not necessarily of money. Again though, it's a bit of a stretch.

It's a good point, man. As of your review, I'm bouncing around a few ideas to work the more blatant greed angle into the story so the dollar has a more resonant meaning. The tricky part is making it succinct but effective so as not to throw the rest of the story off course. I think I've got a good thing with the length and the pacing at this point. I'd like to stay on track with that as I try to incorporate new ideas.

Thanks again, man. Appreciate it. Sorry if I come off like a contrarian. Not my intention.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 19 - 27
wonkavite
Posted: January 31st, 2014, 8:25pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Hey James -

Gave this one a look (I didn't read anything from the Root of All Evil OWC.  It was an OWC, right?)

First the cons, THEN the pros. Then a few quick suggestions.

I felt the script (descriptives and dialogues) were still pretty rough.  They lacked a lyrical flow that I like to see in scripts, that really pull me into the story.  A bit of red lining, a tightening and a polish would certainly help with that.  It's stylistic stuff, which is a pretty easy fix. Questions and a thought: what the heck is a Skrillix haircut?  And while I know what a septum is, "nose-ring" would probably be a more user-friendly description IMO.  Also, the jogger's death could've gone on a bit longer.  I'd rather have seen that strung out a few lines more, and the boys' fishing dialogue reduced a touch in the balance.

The pros: I LOVE the visuals.  Nothing wrong with a bit of well placed, visually effective gore.  I particularly liked the matted hair on the dollar bill, the ripped jugular followed by the nose ring rip. Admittedly, that would have to be one hell of a strong fishing hook, but I'm purposely overlooking that.

My biggest suggestion?  That you somehow tie the ending more organically into the rest of the story.  For me, the ending fell flat because I expected to get some sort of moralistic tie-in with the dollar bill, or the fortune cookie.  And it really didn't.  If you can pull those together - AND keep the good visual stuff in there, then you'll really have something.  This has potential to do that.  It just needs that clincher to wrap it all up satisfactorily...!

Cheers,

--Me
Logged
e-mail Reply: 20 - 27
James McClung
Posted: February 1st, 2014, 7:56pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48
Thanks for the read, Janet.


Quoted from wonkavite
I didn't read anything from the Root of All Evil OWC.  It was an OWC, right?


It was not an OWC. It's a collaborative project Michael (Kospiah) is putting together and has been taking submissions for. Good Things Come... is one such submission.


Quoted from wonkavite
I felt the script (descriptives and dialogues) were still pretty rough.  They lacked a lyrical flow that I like to see in scripts, that really pull me into the story.  A bit of red lining, a tightening and a polish would certainly help with that.  It's stylistic stuff, which is a pretty easy fix.


I think I see what you're getting at. Any particular suggestions? Also, not sure what you mean by "red lining."


Quoted from wonkavite
Questions and a thought: what the heck is a Skrillix haircut?  And while I know what a septum is, "nose-ring" would probably be a more user-friendly description IMO.


A Skrillex haircut is long hair with one side (not completely half) shaved as popularized by dubstep artist Skrillex. There's not really a name for it other than "Skrillex hair." I considered whether or not the reference might be too obscure but both Skrillex and his haircut are increasingly popular nowadays and in any case, a quick Google search clears it up.

I thought it was a nice touch. Same with the septum ring. A simple nose ring wouldn't be quite the same. I like to have at least a little food for thought in my scripts.


Quoted from wonkavite
Also, the jogger's death could've gone on a bit longer.  I'd rather have seen that strung out a few lines more, and the boys' fishing dialogue reduced a touch in the balance.


Duly noted.


Quoted from wonkavite
My biggest suggestion?  That you somehow tie the ending more organically into the rest of the story.  For me, the ending fell flat because I expected to get some sort of moralistic tie-in with the dollar bill, or the fortune cookie.  And it really didn't.  If you can pull those together - AND keep the good visual stuff in there, then you'll really have something.  This has potential to do that.  It just needs that clincher to wrap it all up satisfactorily...!


I'm working on it. I'm definitely trying to make the dollar bill more significant metaphorically speaking. It's the element that ties all the other ROAE stories together so naturally, it deserves to stand out.

I'm thinking about the fortune cookies as well but I'm pleased with how some people have been applying the fortunes to the ending. I always like to have some elements open to interpretation. I also think the fortunes make good intros for the characters and people don't forget about them when the stories over so hopefully that means they have some sort of resonance.

Then again, that could just be a total copout. I'll mull it over for sure. I do think the ending needs a little extra something and one of the next steps for me is to give it that.

Thanks again! Currently about two thirds into Bittersweet. Will post a review within the next few days.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 21 - 27
Abe from LA
Posted: February 6th, 2014, 8:55pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Downey, California
Posts
556
Posts Per Day
0.08
James,

I have to agree with a lot of what has been said.  I think the monster concept is intriguing, but there is a sluggishness to the story line that I blame on Felix and Gideon.

They're slackers, true. That alone doesn't mean they should die. It seems they are just too stupid to live. But wasn't that the complaint against annoying teens getting killed at summer camp, way back when?
I think these dudes are somewhat flat characters because you've already decided they are dead meat.

They don't feel fully formed, their character arcs undeveloped. Personally, I never abandoned Felix. I was rooting for him to make a come back.You tell us Felix is an out-of-work cook, that's fine. More importantly I learned from the early pages that he wants to work, he wants to take responsibility, but he's weak, easily manipulated, insecure, naive, a stoner and maybe girlfriend-less.
Great, those are character flaws.

Felix then has a chance to step up, take charge, offer resistance when the monster comes calling.  Give him a fishing pole, some balls and a purpose — he's hero material.  Rather than focusing on his unemployment, shift the focus to fishing. Maybe he's a slacker who too often escapes to the lake — where he's a darn good fisherman.
I can see the makings of an interesting confrontation. Human angler vs. Monster fishing for food.

Why not dangle the dollar bill on the lake? If the monsters can snatch victims from a forest trail, why can't they cast a lure out to the lake, for the fishermen?  

I'm a little curious about this monster(s).  The yellow eyes and trees don't seem to go together. Makes me think of a Disneyland attraction. Instead,  i kind of envision an entity like PREDATOR, who hang out in the trees. as I'm sure you remember.  But trees with eyes, not sure about that?
Someone mentioned the monster's motives.  I wondered that, too. What is their purpose?
Fishing solely for food?  Food and trophies?

in scene one, when the jogger is first snatched, was the dollar and a piece of her leg ripped from pocket? If so, then how could she get snapped up a second time since the hook/dollar had been removed?  

some offerings:

On page 3 you have a scene with a missing person's poster, and the SUV whizzing past.  Maybe you can use this opp to give us another sampling of a monster attack. Such as, the park ranger is hammering the poster to a tree, next to about 5 other missing persons fliers, when WHOOSH. He gets whipped out of the scene. And aool of his posters float to the ground like falling leaves.

Instead of Jerome and Gabby, the guys could be meeting 2 girls at the lake. And the girls could be appetizers for the monsters. Another monster opp.

Maybe the dollar bills are actually tree leaves that mimic money. This would give the monsters an infinite amount of bait and tell us that they are pretty advanced predators. Like carnivorous plants, they have evolved in a way that makes them self-sufficient.

Something here reminds me a bit of "Day of the Triffids," a story about plant spores that fall to earth and take root. At first they appear harmless, but as they grow in size and in appetite, they became mobile. Mobile manhunters. The kicker here is that the creatures have a way to blind their victims in the most innocuous, but spectacular way imaginable. But I digress.

If you want to justify why Gideon and Felix are worthless pieces of meat, all you have to do is throw in some careless roadkill en route to the lake. And them not giving a deer's antler about it.

Just my own morbid wishes, but I'd like to see a scene where body parts are raining from the tree branches, into the lake. Maybe the monsters are ridding themselves of the excess. Kind of a funny thought here: dumping human remains in a lake.

I guess that's enough to chew on. It seems you are married to a particular story, but I hope you give thought to your main characters.  Good luck.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 22 - 27
James McClung
Posted: February 6th, 2014, 11:49pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48
Thanks for the read, Abe.

I hope you don't mind if I respond generally, as you've graciously thrown a lot of suggestions my way. It seems your bottom line is to work on the characters and that in a sense, they lead to a dead end, both story-wise, arc-wise, and of course, the fact that they're eaten by carnivorous trees.

I'm thinking of giving the story a major overhaul, making Felix a more dynamic character, and perhaps having him escape in the end. I wasn't too fond with that idea at first but the more I've thought about it, the more it seems not so bad a choice. I mean, he is indeed sort of flat at this point but I do like where he's coming from.

Gideon, I'd like to keep him the way he is. I do like that he's sort of a devilish aura of laziness, apathy, and corner cutting. I mean, at the beginning of the story, the characters are poised as opposites, which could make for some interesting dynamics. But perhaps the story doesn't live up to that.

The monsters, I'd like to keep the way they are. I mean, I love the idea of trees fishing for people. I don't know why. I just love it. And I think there's a way to make it work.

I mean, admittedly, it's an ass stupid concept. It really is. But that's the fun. Someone recently compared the story to Creepshow; that's an apt comparison, I would say. If you think too hard about it, of course, it's going to come apart.

Also, the bottom line is I wanted to write something that fit with the tone Michael had established for this anthology. I wrote my own thing, to an extent, but this is still his project, first and foremost, and I wanted to make mine a cohesive work.

The character dynamics and the plot still need some work though. No doubt. I'm working on coming up with a more direct, dynamic, and satisfying stream of events for the rewrite. And I appreciate the suggestions.

Thanks again.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 23 - 27
PrussianMosby
Posted: March 5th, 2014, 2:25am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Posts
1399
Posts Per Day
0.36
Hey James,

You give a lot of reads to people; so, I was interested about your scripts. "The alchemist..." was a little bit long for me by now. Curious long for a short at all, but maybe I check in next time...

I'm distanced when it comes to loglines, concerning meanings and so on. Not much interested in it. So, I can say it in an unexcitedly way: best so far. Perfect for whatever it's worth.


Okay, the play:

It's very hard for me to give this feedback and I have a lot to think about how to deliver the best feedback I can here; because it's complicated. You'll see.

I love the Predator for several reasons: It has no visual shape and it represents the supernaturalism at best. Especially I like that the predator has no system of values; I even can't be angry with it for being the hunter it is. It's everything we have no imagination where it's coming from and for whom or what it acts.

Your introduction by showing him as a force was fine. I liked the shot when we see the boat from the POV. I would let the yellow eyes (only the eyes) appear from nothingness, like: when the Pred. focuses something the eyes become visible.
That would be a great image. Also, I would cut its physical appearance with the hook, I mean as it carries the beer after the killing and
maybe the hook at all is just important for finishing Gideon stylish; that shouldn't be.

The hook in the dollar isn't perfect. And Gideon should have seen the blood when the bill flattered around for such a long time.

A better option for killing in this way would be if Gideon has a fishhook which hangs out of his pants pocket and the "force" lifts it up into his nose ring.

Another tiny thing: Wasn't the corpse of the jogger at the place where they brought the boat to sea? If so, Gideon chooses an uncomfortable place to pee. He should have given a reaction to the smell. Hope I didn't read over.

The part between, the MONSTER sees the guys, and Felix finally sees the yellow eyes, is too long. You lose a bit of suspense here.

P2/3 is overwritten.

On p1 I disliked these lines:  

FELIX
Gideon, did you just eat your
fortune?

I wouldn't let him call Gideon by name + he shouldn't be surprised of his friend's behavior like that. They know each other. Think about how often a friend surprises you like that, in such a kind of unimportant way which will "lead you to comment that in a way Felix does here". Gideon isn't out of his role, who he is, not, so why is Felix surprised, replys what Gideon just has done.

If you feel you're right in the characterization and it should show up Felix as a guy who talks eloquent up to stuffy around (which is surely possible) it's the wrong time to START with that (so early).  A too complex context in opposite to the risk of getting misunderstood by readers .

Out of the fact that you don't need the fortune cookies, he should just say sth like:  "Tastes good, your fortune?" or better even nothing.

Okay, I hope that you can comprehend the long speech about the two lines, because that reflects the points where I see the script's problems.

I'm half and half about both young men. I guess you wanted to bring some color inside the script and present some extraordinary unique characters. It's right, but the approach isn't enough. I have doubts about both of them.

I like to watch them, but have still doubts. And from what I know about stories, doubts means that there's something wrong.


Felix: is pale, he wears glasses, has a Skrillex haircut, drives a SUV, goes fishing, smokes weed, drinks beer, he's cook.

Gideon: overweight, pierced through the nose and does the same stuff as Felix. He looks up/leans a bit on to Felix, because they mainly talk about things concerning Felix's life.

I got no prejudices against those people; I mean especially in case of their outer main characteristics SKRILLEX HAIRCUT and PIERCED SECTRUM.

I think to know that those guys go with trends. They separate themselves from the "normal one's" but at least it's just a trend, most times, which they live up.

There's nothing wrong about that. And maybe you write here out of some personal experiences with such people. So, they might be authentic.

I, for myself, already had my doubts since the fortune cookies thing. That Gideon eats the paper is self-ironic and bovine in case of humor. A guy who really wants to separate himself AND SHOWS UP that he reflects life, others and everything by piercing his nose... You know,... that's an Understatement, which is fine. Then he shouldn't eat paper like an (idiot).

The skrillex, glasses guy gives an outer impression as if he's introverted. But he's chatting all the time, does all the thing I mentioned, cooking, smoking...

Why is he pale when he goes out for fishing? Why does his friend has to eat bad food out of a tin when he's a chef cook?

I remembered their look when these guys were sitting in the boat and remembered precisely HOW THEY REALLY LOOK. Yeah, it was different, but I was between a nodding smile and shaking my head in disbelief.


It felt very hard to explain what I mean and I hope it's coming something through. I could write a lot more of those things. Hope this delivers my point enough.


I think you know what you are doing with both of them. These alternative characters are completely deliberated. Just...
The risk you go with their characterization has to be developed believable by 100%, not less, and as unassailable as an easy characterization of stereotypes would have to.
The bonus is only there when it's to the point.

Take your worth out of my impressions. If you think they're useful in any case, try to find the answer where my doubts are based on. I don't know it. It's too complicated. As I said it's still interesting and I LIKE it very much that they're different. I hope you recognize enough that I try to help you to bring out the great potential of your still unique characters on the Screen in the best way.


I guess,

Just a guess- it could be something in their physical description:

I could imagine Felix more with dreadlocks (mirrors his lust for life as he is, shows more stability, a different kind of stability).

And Gideon, perhaps as a pierced but fashion-conscious person(damn alternative, fresh and unique for my taste).

Maybe it's just the lead, Felix, which is wrong in that case...?

Or, for sure, on the other side, the problem could be in their behavior and not on the surface . In the little facets of interactions. I don't know...



The scene composition is good. The Predator theme with a lot of distraction about cooking... too. Tidy up some dialogues.

The courage of doing such a risky choice of characters brings up a lot of work. It pays out for the audience. Keep an eye on your anti-stereotypes and learn, master their development and you have a screaming trademark which jumps out of the page, in my eyes. A very attractive one. Nevertheless, hard work to do so.

It was interesting. The ambition is welcome. New things=always good, I guess




Revision History (2 edits; 1 reasons shown)
PrussianMosby  -  March 5th, 2014, 3:01am
Logged
Private Message Reply: 24 - 27
James McClung
Posted: March 5th, 2014, 3:25pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48
Thanks for the read, dude.

I get the bit about the fortune cookie. The line reads false in the sense that these guys know each other and have probably lost the ability to surprise each other, for the most part.

As for the rest... I'm not really sure what you're getting at. Are you saying the look of the characters contradicts their behavior? I think that's your point but I can't really tell the way you've phrased everything. You said yourself it's hard to explain but I could definitely use the clarification.

In any case, I think you're reading too much into some things. The characters aren't trying to separate themselves from "normal" tends, for one thing; that's just their style. Not sure I've written anything to infer they're deliberately counterculture or anything. And besides, I don't think most people who move within alternative culture circles even think about things that way; they just like what they like.

Also the little things like a pale Felix going fishing or Gideon eating Chef Boyarde when his friend is a chef... definitely a stretch. Even if these guys are homebodies, which I would say they are, that doesn't mean they can't go out every once in a while. And just because Felix is a chef doesn't mean he's going to cook for his friends all the time or that his friends would have a higher taste in cuisine or something.

I think the biggest misconception is that Felix is introverted. You're actually the second person to bring this up. Is he introverted because he wants to get a job? That's nonsense. The way I look at it, it's crunch time for him. There's plenty of weed smokers out there who still know when they have to put their business caps on. Felix even says something to the effect that if he's going to cut loose, he wants to have work out of the way.

In any case, I'm glad you notice these things. I do try to incorporate small touches like the Skrillex haircut to add some flavor to what I write. They're certainly not essential but a nice touch and offer up ideas that producers can take or leave if they want to. They're food for thought, if anything.

Anyway, not sure what is going to happen to this one except that it needs a significant overall. I'd like to shift the focus of the script from the characters more towards the horror elements, ideally striking a balance between the two. Working on a feature at the moment so we'll see what happens, I expect.

Thanks again, man.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 25 - 27
PrussianMosby
Posted: March 5th, 2014, 4:50pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Posts
1399
Posts Per Day
0.36
Your quote: "I do try to incorporate small touches like the Skrillex haircut to add some flavor to what I write. They're certainly not essential ..."

For me they are. And those kind of completely wrong decisions in case of storytelling, too.

Sorry, we seem to have no base to talk here. I could quote everything you told, justified, defended whatever... in the last comment- but we're too far away, not worth to argue out of such different ranges.

why:
Here is a quote of mine: "It felt very hard to explain what I mean and I hope it's coming something through. I could write a lot more of those things. Hope this delivers my point enough."

I throw one of these things, which I even didn't mention, in here. It's also very contradictory, but the whole fine tuning seems to be not getting through to you:
A fisher isn't pale. I don't know much about fishing, but it goes for hours. And if you do it only 2-3 times in summer than you are tanned in the face till winter. Maybe he picks a hat on his Skrillex haircut. Why not. Must look funny.

There are enough points already mentioned which are same and at least more sensitive than this obviously point. Maybe I didn't told you tgis one because the points I used feel more important from a sensitive view on the characters- another misconception

I don't think only such superficial points are the only necessary one's to think about, IT'S A MIX OF ALL THE THINGS I MENTIONED... Don't try to find out... as you said, "it's crunch time for him"

Yes, you're right, it is a big misconception. Sorry for that, but as I said, there's no further base for me here... Let me know if I should delete my comment. I wasn't sure if I should answer anymore. It's a lose lose situation. I don't want to make you or anybody feel uncomfortable. I'll leave here and move on-

CU



Logged
Private Message Reply: 26 - 27
James McClung
Posted: March 5th, 2014, 7:16pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48

Quoted from PrussianMosby
Yes, you're right, it is a big misconception. Sorry for that, but as I said, there's no further base for me here... Let me know if I should delete my comment. I wasn't sure if I should answer anymore. It's a lose lose situation. I don't want to make you or anybody feel uncomfortable. I'll leave here and move on-


No need to delete the comment. Not a lose lose situation; I like to hear what people think, whatever it is. You certainly didn't make me feel uncomfortable in any way. Was just confused as to how your original post was worded is all. No worries.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 27 - 27
 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Short Horror  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006