Hey Steven, hope you are fine
-- endless notes, don't hate me--
Your title and logline, while qualified, read more as of your familiar drama territory, especially the logline. It got quite a lot of conflict bound to characters and their relationships, but there's no true hint at what action and theme, movement, the script has to offer. A Thriller imo has to stand for movement – example: Bourne 123 is a violent cat and mouse game in the world of spies or sth. whatever (we immediately connect even that bland phrase to politics, intelligence, guns, fights, interests, fraud… lots of associations there)
…"must come to terms with the childhood disappearance of his brother" is the statement about your protagonist's task here
but what does he actually do, no clue here???
What's thrilling about the story, hard on tone and clear on scenario?
^^ I'll come back to that when having read the script.
---
"Close to sunset" that's suggestive in case of the title, you did the same when calling them BROTHERS, with regards to the description before. Just saying…
Your writing seems to be flawless here again. Not that I know English or AE very well but from my scriptwriting standpoint, it's very good.
Madison is presented as the teenager who storms off upstairs to her room, then few seconds later she's at the foot of the stairs again… The screen-time feels not 100%. The whole location here, clearly isn't that interesting, so, imo, you should be 100% precise to make it work – with perfect timing. << fucking nitpicking I know
EXT. MOM'S HOUSE – DAY
Not sure about the slug here…
In General, this slug works, sure, although, only with the logline in mind it does I believe…
But who would mom be if we'd just read over the logline.
Possibly, it should be GRANDMA MCKEAN'S HOUSE or sth.
End of page 5 – still full on drama
Still very good execution
Okay, there's a woman that held that camera.
I must say I had a problem here with understanding the context. Point is the first SERIES OF SHOTS: -- Now I see those were actual few separated images running over camera.
IMO Separate them via foregoing dashes. You should, imo, indicate clearer that there's a third person at the playground-- somehow. It wasn't clear to me. I've seen the grainy movie thing more as a say romantic, stylistic choice of you rather than a part of the story!
"It's good to see you, sis.
It's good to see you, too.
Her reaction may be authentic as is, but it's somehow slow and static.
P7 I like the mystery, I like the suspense, the slow that I know from you – though clearly this is no thriller. I made the same mistake recently. IMO It's a hard socio cultural drama.
Especially because you stretch it so much: "We never did talk much
about that…etc. " The audience, we, already think to know, or better said, got a feel what's going on…
In a sense: There's much more reflection than movement happening in this experience.
Which isn't bad at all – it's just a matter of fact to me that this reads not like a Thriller.
Wait, I remember that Trish is forties and Jack's fifties which produces a whole other context now I see. She wouldn't had even been alive when things around Samuel's disappearance happened,,, thing is, this reads very complicated for an audience to perceive as simple viewers.
Second half 10/ first of eleven is when dialogue and conflict gets pretty active and masterful.
Okay at 14 I think the cat is in the trunk, the boy lies in the grave let's see
"The shadows grow long. Close to sunset." Here, you got again the reference to the title. It's really an open suggestion to the director to carry the title with such shots… I'm not sure what to think about it… Really. It's done well but imo a title should stand on its own and shouldn't make sense afterwards or be ambiguous, just my opinion.
All right. It's one of the few stories of you I read that I think are not ready when reading them.
Perhaps I'm wrong, and missed a part but I completely missed the mother's motive to kill Samuel, and not Jack. So, Jack has, must have, grown up with his mother and even with his younger sister Trish – but somehow his mother chose to kill off Sam and leave Jack at the playground alone. Thos strings are loose and open to me. The drama, the slow of you, is once again awesome here.
Personally, I see no Thriller here. The last page's twist were not reasoned well to qualify it as a thrilling piece. This is a drama to me throughout, so I won't come back to the logline now.
Feel free to ask more. I'm a completely fallible guy and possibly I missed what's needed to understand the mother.
Your writing is so strong that I even enjoyed reading this story, a good story I feel, the third act just should have say equalized the whole.
Man, I hope my notes help. And anyway, I'm a fan of you and would like to know why the mother killed Samuel, and when she dragged Samuel, at the playground, away from Jack, and into the car, then who was the woman with the camera.
Damn, now I reread your initial question…
Had Samuel done something toward mom's cat??? Truly no clue without rereading your statement on the mother's motives, sorry.
And also sorry for my grammar mistakes
I'm sure you find a way to bring this story to screen too. Lots of clever and intelligent storytelling there yet. It was like EVENT - tons of sensibility in storytelling and arts – and then BANG
That bang was not balanced yet. The overlong second act was strong.
All best and forgive me my grammatical issues, I might edit some tomorrow
Alex