SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 19th, 2024, 3:48pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Unproduced Screenplay Discussion    Short Scripts  ›  Soulshadows II: Uncle Harry Moderators: bert
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 15 Guests

 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Soulshadows II: Uncle Harry  (currently 4372 views)
Don
Posted: November 9th, 2009, 8:55pm Report to Moderator
Administrator
Administrator


So, what are you writing?

Location
Virginia
Posts
16417
Posts Per Day
1.93
Soulshadows II: Uncle Harry by Steven P. Dilworth (steven8 ) (Tanis by Robert Newcomer and Steven P. Dilworth) - Series, Supernatural -  Scott's Uncle Harry may have been cruel and vindictive all his life, but who says it has to end there? - pdf, format

Listen to the audio version.

Enjoy other scripts in the SoulShadows II Series or the first season of SoulShadows


Visit SimplyScripts.com for what is new on the site.

-------------
You will miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
- Wayne Gretzky
Logged Offline
Site Private Message
Grandma Bear
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 12:04am Report to Moderator
Administrator



Location
The Swamp...
Posts
7961
Posts Per Day
1.35
Hey Steven,

very well written script, but I'm including some suggestions/questions below. Nothing big to complain about as far as the writing goes.

Characters were fine. My only issue here was the remote control... I felt you took too long to make it play a major part. Sure it was mentioned fairly early, but it didn't become an antagonist until way past the 1st ppt. at least IMHO.

silly comments that I jot down while reading. good start in the middle of the action.

I liked the return to Tanis. after the initial intro and first scene. new and different.

what does "greats people in a very classic fashion mean? I'm a foreigner here in the US. I have no idea what you mean by that.

ditto that for Gina�

give you the shirt "off" his back? not sure about this. maybe I'm wrong.

more weird descriptions of hugs. I guess I'm dense. LOL

oily business? I think you have too many descriptions that I've never heard of, but maybe everyone else has, so take it with a grain of salt.

page 5 at the eagles club should definitely be a "flashback"! I see you have that on a second look, but it's not in the right place. I think� also pretty sure it should be END FLASHBACK rather than RETURN TO PRESENT. again, could be wrong.

Is that really a montage on page 10? Just asking. seems like just a scene to me or series of shots.

good transitions

I don't know what classic "implore" stance means. I'm sure everyone else do, but I don't and I don't like googling everything I don't know.

nice come back to the Scott and Sarah's house with the ripped clothes and heavy breathing.

overall, very nice, but a tad too chatty. Great entry.



Revision History (1 edits)
Grandma Bear  -  November 10th, 2009, 12:32am
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 16
steven8
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 12:57am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


The Ed Wood of Simply Scripts

Location
Barberton, OH
Posts
1156
Posts Per Day
0.22

Quoted from Grandma Bear
Hey Steven,

very well written script, but I'm including some suggestions/questions below. Nothing big to complain about as far as the writing goes.


Thank you, Pia.  The phrase "very well written script" means a lot!!


Quoted from Grandma Bear

Characters were fine. My only issue here was the remote control... I felt you took too long to make it play a major part. Sure it was mentioned fairly early, but it didn't become an antagonist until way past the 1st ppt. at least IMHO.
[quote]

Hmm.  I'm not sure how I could have moved that point up.  I tried to build on it's importance as a heinous tool wield by the first antagonist, who then passed his soul to it when he died.  Hmm.

[quote=me]
silly comments that I jot down while reading. good start in the middle of the action.

I liked the return to Tanis. new and different.


Very glad you liked the return to Tanis.  When I first decided to write a Soulshadows episode, I didn't realize that bert wrote the Tanis parts, and it was the idea of writing the Tanis character which excited me so much in the first place.    I had the whole Tanis segment written, and then Michael posted the 'rules' for the series, which stated that we were NOT to write the Tanis part.  That popped my balloon, I can tell you.  bert, however, said that if it excited me that much, to go ahead, and he'd look at it afterward.  My initial Tanis segment was nothing like this, except for the false start.  Bert liked that part, and kept it.


Quoted from Grandma Bear

what does "greats people in a very classic fashion mean? I'm a foreigner here in the US. I have no idea what you mean by that.

ditto that for Gina…


Ah, this may not be unique to America either, as it may just be my upbringing.  Not sure.  Classic, to me means that in a funeral home, you always keep your actions low key, voice down, and greetings of people at the casket are very low key and formal.  This is how Rhonda greeted people, but Gina was too loud and 'glamorous' with her actions.  "OH, It's so wonderful to see you.", etc., and guys (and maybe girls) may walk away from one of her hugs wondering if she had been coming on to them.


Quoted from Grandma Bear

give you the shirt "off" his back? not sure about this. maybe I'm wrong.


Yep, I missed an 'F'.  Should have been off.  I read that thing five times before submitting the final, too!  Doh!


Quoted from Grandma Bear

more weird descriptions of hugs. I guess I'm dense. LOL


No, not dense at all.  It's my job to convey the ideas properly.


Quoted from Grandma Bear

oily business? I think you have too many descriptions that I've never heard of, but maybe everyone else has, so take it with a grain of salt.


Harry's 'friends' were mostly his drinking buddy's and they weren't perhaps the classy types.  They also mostly hoped he'd left them some of his precious treasure he always bragged about.  So their proclamations about his wonderful nature were false and overdone.  'oily'


Quoted from Grandma Bear

page 5 at the eagles club should definitely be a "flashback"! I see you have that on a second look, but it's not in the right place. I think… also pretty sure it should be END FLASHBACK rather than RETURN TO PRESENT. again, could be wrong.
[quote]

I found it shown as RETURN TO PRESENT in a paper I read about the proper formatting of flashbacks.  The only explanation I can give.  

[quote=me]
Is that really a montage on page 10? Just asking. seems like just a scene to me or series of shots.


It covered a passage of time throughout the funeral, so I thought it better as a montage than a series of shots.


Quoted from Grandma Bear

good transitions


Thank you.


Quoted from Grandma Bear

I don't know what classic "implore" stance means. I'm sure everyone else do, but I don't and I don't like googling everything I don't know.


Like with your hands apart with a 'what did I do wrong?' look on your face.


Quoted from Grandma Bear

overall, very nice, but a tad too chatty. Great entry.


Thank you Pia.  I suppose some of the dialogue could be conveyed through actions, thus reducing the chattiness.  I appreciate your reading this and giving me your thoughts.  This was a fun script to write!



...in no particular order
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 16
grademan
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 9:31am Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Wisconsin
Posts
872
Posts Per Day
0.16
Steven,

I read this and then listened to the iScript version. The audio version was better than reading the script. I think it's because I didn't analyze the story when listening to it. Does that mean it would be better as a film? I don't know. I have a few comments to help sort out what I thought about the script:

-- Tanis was great, as usual. Her fumbing with the remote was well done. A techno-phobe with remotes. Funny, she seemed more comfortable with a cell phone in a prior episode.
-- The bookend scenes with the remote was a cool idea. It's hard to make a remote control ominous and this helped that a lot.
--  Harry was such an unlikeable ass, I doubt he would have such a large funeral attendance. Drinking buddies with hope of inheritance? Would have been better to have everyone there cause they hated him. Would have been an interesting dynamic.
-- The Reverend knew about the remote? And everyone  knew about it? Harry was more popular than I thought.
-- Of course, the remote was meant to absorb Harry's mean temper but it would have been interesting to see if the remote had any impact on Harry.
-- A few awkward descriptions: The implore stance, oily business, and (FILTERED) in the character slugs were lost on me. I did like the bit about the remote blurrring into a light saber.
-- Dialogue was a bit long esp. at the funeral. There were some gems in there. "Yes, you almost behaved" was my favorite.
-- It took pages before we left the funeral and Scott's house and got to the executor's meeting where the remote was up for grabs -- though why anyone would want the remote is beyond me.
-- The part where the voice on the TV was repeating Harry's sentences in Scott's and Sarah's voices was a cool device to add tension. Nicely done.

Overall, good effort. The plot was well structured but the story was a mixed bag for me. Some of it I liked, some of it could have been better.

SoulShadows is a cool idea and like the OWC is a stretch for all of us. You took the risk and did well with it. You told Pia in the post above you had fun writing this. Cool.

Gary

BTW, thanks for not referencing Adam Sandler's medicore movie about a universal remote.

Revision History (3 edits; 1 reasons shown)
grademan  -  November 10th, 2009, 12:23pm
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 16
Dreamscale
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 2:51pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Hey Steven, I took page by page notes for you, so you’re getting a double post.

I actually liked this one quite a bit when it was all said and done.  There are lots of issues, IMO.  The technical ones are all covered in the page by page notes, but let’s discuss some things here as well.

Too slow, dull, and detailed in the beginning.  Too many useless characters overall.  Not enough dialogue that helps us get to know anyone, as most of it didn’t go anywhere (until the end).  Note, I’m not saying in any way that there is too much dialogue, I’m saying what you chose to write didn’t do much in terms of characterization until very late in the game.

I think the biggest problem here is that you chose to show the wrong scenes in this story, and because of that, it was too slow up front and we never got to know much about your title character, Uncle Harry, or his evil remote.

IMO, the opening scenes in the funeral and cemetery went nowhere and did nothing. Too many characters intro’d that really had no place in the script took space away from showing us Uncle Harry, and why he was so mean, and what the deal with the remote was.  I’d completely rethink everything up to page 14 or so.  Once things got going between Scott, Sarah and the remote, it was a great story and read, but up to that, it was flatline and had many wasted opportunities to develop Harry’s character.

I don’t think the Flashbacks worked very well.  Instead of all the goings on at the funeral and cemetery, you could have just had Scott and Sarah (or 1 or 2 of the sisters) reflecting on old Uncle Harry…through Flashbacks even.  But if the Flashbacks provided the only real action, they wouldn’t seem so out of place, like they did.

As I said in my page by page notes, I really liked the finale and ending.  Well done. I liked how you went back to the opening with Scott and Sarah ready to swing away, also.  Very well done and creative.  And because of that, I actually liked this overall, based on the payoff.

Hope this makes sense and helps.

Page by page notes

Page 1 – I miss the usual cool transition from Tanis’ Alcove directly into the story.

Page 2 – Initial intro’s are a bit long and awkward.

Love the “wrong” beginning, and Tanis’ return.  Very unique idea.

Opening sentence under new Slug feels long and awkward.

Page 3 – All your intro’s are tough for me…too much completely unnecessary detail and info.  They’re also awkwardly written, and many aren’t even complete thoughts.

I don’t know where the dialogue is coming from between Scott and Sarah, re Uncle Harry’s money…seems completely out of left field.

Myra and Les’ intro is very awkward, with no ages given.  “Older” can have a lot of different meanings, depending on the age of the reader, for instance.

Page 4 – I like Les’ dialogue…very funny!

Too much description of things that don’t matter – each person hugging someone else in a different manner, etc.  Just skip all this nonsense.

“Another couple walks up and gives Rhonda and Gina the oily business about what a great man their Uncle was, and how much they loved his beautiful collection of antiques.” – So you’re telling us this is happening, but there’s no dialogue going on.  There’s no one intro’d (you’d use all caps if you’re intro’ing a new character).  So this is a throwaway passage that shouldn’t even be in here.

Sarah’s last line here makes her out to be a real bitch, IMO.  This is not the kind of thing to say about people at a funeral.

Page 5 – “Scott is sipping a coke, and Harry brandishes a very large mixed drink.” – Very awkward sentence here.  The first part should obviously be rewritten to read, “Scott sips a Coke”.  The second part just sounds weird with the word “brandishes”.  Also, the use of “very large” paints an odd picture in my head…like insanely big, and I doubt that’s what you’re going for.

I cannot get a visual of Myra and Les here cause I have no idea how old they are still (you say “younger versions”, and that’s relating to your earlier description of “older”).  Know what I’m saying?

“. . .and my nephew and I are now heading to out find more pieces of silver to complete that set!” – “to” and “out” need to be flipped.

As Pia said, the Flashback is incorrect the way it’s laid out.  A Flashback is really just another scene that takes place in a different time period.  Interesting note -  I did a quick Google search, and the very first example says to do it the way you did it…but I do not agree with it.  There are a number of different ways to write a Flashback, but the bottom line is to make sure it is clear and makes sense.  Here’s the issue with the way you have it – you return to present just fine…it’s very clear the Flashback is over, but by not setting the scene again (with a Slug) it’s tough to remember exactly where we were.  And this Flashback was less than a page…just think if your Flashback was 3 or 4 pages long.  My advice is when returning from a Flashback, treat it like a normal scene and write a new Slug, so it’s clear where we are.

OK, here’s another issue with this Flashback – you return to the prior scene obviously (but I had to check and see where we were) and it comes off like Scott just told this story to Sarah and Gina.  A Flashback does not necessarily mean that a story is being told, but we’re seeing it actually play out.  Many times, Flashbacks are simply a single character reflecting back in time…remembering.  If you want this to be told to other characters, you have to set it up that way, IMO.  Interesting to see if anyone else has thoughts on this.

Page 6 – Hmmm, another Flashback, 1 page later.  For me, the use of these Flashbacks is kind of taking me out of the story…but maybe the problem is that the story has been too stagnant in the funeral home, too long.

Page 9 – “Sarah and I’d better get going. The more I think about him the madder I get. Folks might not like it if I punch the corpse.” – First of all, “I’d” should be “I” – it doesn’t read or sound right using a contraction here, even though proper English would say that “I had” is correct.  The last sentence here doesn’t work for me, and again just sounds like something that shouldn’t be said in a funeral.

It’s a tough sell because there have only been 2 relatively short Flashbacks with Uncle Harry in them.  In the first one, he didn’t come off as a bad guy…maybe a little improper drinking in a bar with his 13 year old nephew, but he seemed pretty nice and jovial.  In the 2nd Flashback, he starts out sounding cool, asking if dinner was OK, but then lost it for no reason.  It’s hard for me to think he’s such a bad guy just based on what I’ve been shown.

The inclusion of “FADE TO:” cost you a whole bunch of lines, and what did it accomplish?  Exactly, nothing.  I just don’t see any reason for transitions like this, unless you are doing something outside the box…for an effect.  When page count “counts”, avoid these and get as much prose into your script as you can.

Page 10 – This not a ‘Montage”, and I don’t see any reason for even wanting to use one here.  If anything, it’s a Series Of Shots, but that’s not necessary either, IMO.

“preparing to speak” – stay away from verbs like this.  They don’t work in a script…it’s like he’s frozen in place.

“The Reverend has raised his hand for the benediction.” – incorrect tense used here.  Keep it all in the present, brother!

Page 11 – Again, I don’t like the dialogue between Scott and Sarah…it feels completely inappropriate, and makes them look like A-Holes, IMO.

Cool, I’m glad Miriam spoke up.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 4 - 16
Dreamscale
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 2:53pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Page 12 – “Rhonda turns to Gina, who is still hugging herself closely, so they all turn to her.” – Really, REALLY awkwardly phrased and confusing.

Is the entire scene with Scott and Sarah actually inside the car?  Nothing is technically incorrect here, but I’m just wondering if you plan on having everything seen from within.  IMO, scenes like these always play better when you have an EXT scene as well, showing the car drive up, or whatever.  Just wondering…

Also, the Slug is missing a time frame.

Page 13 – Another meaningless “FADE TO:”

“INT. HALLWAY SENIOR HAVEN APTS. – LATER” – This is messed up, IMO.  You already intro’d the place as “Wadsworth Senior Haven Apartments”, now it’s just “Senior Haven Apts.”.  Also, the way you have “HALLWAY” followed directly by “SENIOR” without a hyphen, it’s strange.

Page 14 – “sits down his box”, “sits down her box” – these both read very strangely.  I understand what you mean, but using “sits down” doesn’t work.  If not just “puts down”, it would be “sets down”.

General note – every time I read “universal remote” I have to laugh, because no one that I am familiar with actually calls them that.  They are simply known as a “remote”.  Just had to throw that in…sorry.

Page 15 – Good dialogue line from Scott about being able to push Uncle Harry’s buttons!  Funny stuff.

Page 16 – Slug missing a time frame.

Page 18 – “any more” – should be “anymore”

Page 19 – Are new remotes only $10?  I thought they were much more than that.

General note – I’m very happy you are now referring to it simply as “remote”!

Page 20 – “Scott is in the shower as pounding filters through the noise of the water. He realizes it’s the door, and leans out.” – This passage is poorly phrased.  It’s also got an unfilmable in it – “He realizes it’s the door”.

“Sarah is saying something from the hallway, but it can’t be made out over the shower.” – this is also poorly written and phrased.

Sarah isn’t in the bathroom, so her dialogue would be “OS”, right?  Now, if the door is wide open, you’re cool, but if it’s just cracked like you said, I think it’s off.

Page 21 – I like the back and forth here and Sarah’s use of “bullshit”.  Sounds very real, actually.

You’re continually leaving a time frame out of your Slugs. Some of them are fine, because you’re basically using mini slugs, but when there is a passage of time, you need to use a time frame.  For instance, when Scott comes down into the kitchen, we know time has passed, because his hair is wet from the shower.  You can use “moments later” or just “later”.  But you should get in the habit of using something.

“Scott stands there in the classic ’implore’ stance, hands out.” – I think others have commented on this already, and I’ll agree, it’s poorly worded.

Page 22 – “He can’t take it anymore.” – Show us, don’t tell us.

“Over her shoulder.” – out of place in front of the dialogue…could be a wrylie, I’d say.

“Scott stalks past the living room, stares at Sarah sitting in the Lazy Boy, remote it hand, then he stomps into the bedroom and slams the door.” – Lots of issues in this “sentence”.  “it” should be “in”.  It’s a big run-on sentence also that needs to be broken up.  It’s just poorly written and there are too many things to bring up in detail – just rewrite it!

Page 24 – The “CUT TO:” and “SMASH CUT TO:” are just completely unnecessary and waste lines.

I actually really like how you brought us back to this “opening scene”.  Very well done!

Page 25 – “Scott and Sarah’s shadows cast on the wall as they attack each other.” – Although I understand what you’re going for here, and actually like the idea of just showing the shadows, it’s not written correctly, an comes off very awkwardly.

Page 26 – Using “LATER” as your time frame here is incorrect.  Yes, it’s definitely later, but it’s actually days later. Later, IMO refers to later that same day.  When you go to a new day (or night or whatever), just use “DAY”, NIGHT” whatever it is.

Good ending!  Very good ending.

Revision History (1 edits)
grademan  -  November 10th, 2009, 5:21pm
Logged
e-mail Reply: 5 - 16
Grandma Bear
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 5:10pm Report to Moderator
Administrator



Location
The Swamp...
Posts
7961
Posts Per Day
1.35
Great notes Jeff.

I agree about there being some characters that didn't really need to be there and that some of the dialogue didn't reveal character or bring the story forward.

Over all though I thought it was very well done.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 16
stevie
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 8:06pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Down Under
Posts
3441
Posts Per Day
0.61
Hi Steven! How's that footy fix!?

Mate, I really liiked this! I think it may be the first script of yours I have read, apart from an OWC one.
I read some of the other comments and have some agree/disagree points to make.
For me, the opening scenes were great. The funeral home ones especially. I really felt I was in a movie, I could picture the people so well. Then I thought the flashback sort of slowed things a bit. Not the Eagle Bar one, the one where Harry is brandishing the remote. I know you were establishing the power of the thing but it seemed flat to me.
i agree with Jeff about the montage - it isn't one. Just one long scene at the graveyard.
Ok, when the remote starts to exert its influence, this was still good. But I though Scott and Sarah got worked up to quickly. To me, it would've been better, say, if Sarah first asked if he had said something. Then the TV could keep saying more louder stuff. Then they could finally snap. a gradual buildup seemed more appropriate to me.

Ok the ending was prefaced in the first scene. Is this good? Possibly. It made it predictable but no less exciting. Your writing was top notch!

anyway nice effort for the series and go the sainters in 2010



Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 16
Dreamscale
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 8:25pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Agree with Stevie-mate that the remote took over too quickly, but I think that's because there wasn't enough room (space) to play it out like it could have, because the intro part was WAY TOO DAMN LONG AND DULL.

How's that for a WAY TOO LONG sentence?

Problem with the beginning...or actually the first 14 pages or so, is that nothing relevant happened.  All the characterization was for minor characters that had nothing to do with the actual story or plot.  We needed to get to know Scott, Sarah, and of course our title charcter, Uncle Harry.

We never got to know old Harry-ass like we needed to.  If he's your title character, he has to have more than the few scenes he did.  We needed to understand what an ass he was...and maybe even why.  We didn't, and that's the big issue here, IMO.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 8 - 16
steven8
Posted: November 11th, 2009, 11:02pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


The Ed Wood of Simply Scripts

Location
Barberton, OH
Posts
1156
Posts Per Day
0.22
Hey!  Thanks a lot for all the great reviews guys.  Jeff, I slapped your review into Word and checked the count.  Your review had a little more than half the total word count for my entire script!!  

I really appreciate all of the time and effort put into these reviews, and I take them to heart.

I'm not so sure there were too many characters at all.  I felt they were all needed to convey what I wanted.  However, it has bugged me as well that Scott and Sarah go off the deep end so fast.  This is due to space limitations, and could be given more room if we got to that segment sooner.  Now, I wouldn't say the beginning was "WAY TOO DAMN LONG AND DULL" myself, I'd say it was a 'slow build up', to quote one of my favorite screenwriters.  

We definitely could have spent more time getting to know old Harry-A** as Jeff suggested, and I think perhaps I know how that could be done.  Or maybe not.  Hmmm.  I'll have to think about that.  I'd like to have an hour long script to make this into more, you know?

I'm mostly excited about four parts of your reviews:

1) Jeff saying "Good ending!  Very good ending." - No one has liked one of my endings before.  Yay!!

2) Stevie saying: "Your writing was top notch!" - Wow!  No one here has said that yet!  Thanks Stevie!!

3) Grademan saying: "You took the risk and did well with it." - Thanks!  That means a lot.

4) Pia saying: "Great entry." - Pia, everything you write is automatically gold, so this means a lot.  Thanks.

Oh yes, Grademan. . .no fear of my ever referencing anything involving Adam Sandler.  Ever.  

Again, thanks guys!


...in no particular order

Revision History (1 edits)
steven8  -  November 11th, 2009, 11:24pm
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 16
Shelton
Posted: November 12th, 2009, 10:59am Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Chicago
Posts
3292
Posts Per Day
0.49
I liked the idea behind this one at its core, but I didn't care too much for the way it was presented.

I think the opening bits at the funeral go on for far too long, which causes the real heart of the story to arrive way late and be cut short.  Because of this, things seem to go from okay to downright awful way too quickly.  

If the opening were shorter, they got the remote quicker, and you had a steady build up with their disagreements that ultimately leads to the ending as you have it, I think the suspense level would go up dramatically.

Anyway, a good concept, but needs more punch.


Shelton's IMDb Profile

"I think I did pretty well, considering I started out with nothing but a bunch of blank paper." - Steve Martin
Logged Offline
Private Message AIM Reply: 10 - 16
steven8
Posted: November 12th, 2009, 11:07am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


The Ed Wood of Simply Scripts

Location
Barberton, OH
Posts
1156
Posts Per Day
0.22
We seem to be building a consensus.  It just needs MORE COWBELL!!  

Thanks Shelton, you are absolutely right.  It's needs to get to the meat of the story sooner, so the remote can do it's voodoo bit with more depth.


...in no particular order
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 16
stebrown
Posted: November 17th, 2009, 7:56am Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Newcastle, England
Posts
881
Posts Per Day
0.15
Hi Steven

I thought this was a very good episode in the series. Good character development and an interesting premise. I think the things being said through the TV were actually unspoken truths between Scott and Sarah but once this 'evil' gets inside their lives then everything comes out in the open.

A couple of technical things like;

Page 4 - You hint at a lot of dialogue in an action paragraph. I don't really think you should go into such detail with that. If you're wanting to say what is being said I'd have thought just writing the dialogue itself would be the way to do it.

Page 13 - INT. HALLWAY SENIOR HAVEN APTS. - LATER

I don't think that is the clearest way to write that slug. It looks like the full name of the place they're in. I'd seperate 'Hallway' from the rest of it.

The script feels to me like it has only two acts.

The build-up - Flashbacks of Uncle Harry and learning about his will.

The remote - There isn't really much going on in between. As soon as Scott and Sarah get the remote they are pretty much in the shit. Maybe some benefit of having the remote could help things out. Maybe even have Sarah coming around to the idea?

I did enjoy the script but I feel the structure could have maybe been improved on.

Ste

P.S. I like how you hinted at a continuation of the story with the object being passed on. A little like the son getting the coin in the end of my 'Riches' episode.


Logged
Site Private Message Reply: 12 - 16
steven8
Posted: November 17th, 2009, 6:42pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


The Ed Wood of Simply Scripts

Location
Barberton, OH
Posts
1156
Posts Per Day
0.22

Quoted from stebrown
Hi Steven

I thought this was a very good episode in the series. Good character development and an interesting premise. I think the things being said through the TV were actually unspoken truths between Scott and Sarah but once this 'evil' gets inside their lives then everything comes out in the open.

A couple of technical things like;

Page 4 - You hint at a lot of dialogue in an action paragraph. I don't really think you should go into such detail with that. If you're wanting to say what is being said I'd have thought just writing the dialogue itself would be the way to do it.

Page 13 - INT. HALLWAY SENIOR HAVEN APTS. - LATER

I don't think that is the clearest way to write that slug. It looks like the full name of the place they're in. I'd seperate 'Hallway' from the rest of it.

The script feels to me like it has only two acts.

The build-up - Flashbacks of Uncle Harry and learning about his will.

The remote - There isn't really much going on in between. As soon as Scott and Sarah get the remote they are pretty much in the shit. Maybe some benefit of having the remote could help things out. Maybe even have Sarah coming around to the idea?

I did enjoy the script but I feel the structure could have maybe been improved on.

Ste

P.S. I like how you hinted at a continuation of the story with the object being passed on. A little like the son getting the coin in the end of my 'Riches' episode.


Yep, it's just like the son getting the coin at the end of your story.  A cool dangler that lets people know that someone else is gonna go through s**t too!  

Good point about that slugline.  It would read better as:

INT. SENIOR HAVEN APTS. - HALLWAY - LATER

You think?

Yeah, putting an encounter including dialog in an action paragraph was certainly not my first choice, and it bothered me, but I felt it didn't need to be detailed, but could just be an improvised bit.  I was trying to save space.

The things said through the TV were in no way unspoken things between Scott and Sarah.  It was Uncle Harry's wicked spirit getting even from beyond the grave.  I believe, if this were filmed, we could convey the mental effects of the spirit from within the remote better, via lighting and acting.  As it reads, I too agree that the characters turn to killing quite quickly, but they are not truly themselves.  The voice from the TV is controlling them in more ways than just nasty remarks.

Thanks a bunch for the read, ste.  I appreciate it!


...in no particular order
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 16
jayrex
Posted: November 18th, 2009, 1:40pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Cut to three weeks earlier

Location
London, UK
Posts
1420
Posts Per Day
0.22
Hello Steven,

I finished your script yesterday and thought it was good but could have been better.  I thought the ending was good but the beginning to middle could have been stronger.  I personally think that if you skipped the funeral scenes and maybe put more time into the remote and the Scott & Sarah scenes, then this would have paid off more.

I also like the beginning with Tanis starting at the wrong point, but felt the choice of scene was a little too late into the script.  Maybe start with a scene from the middle as the current scene choice kinda gave away what we were going to encounter.

Compared to the others in the series, I thought this was a good addition.

Jeff wrote some very good points that I thought best not to repeat.

All the best,


Javier


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 14 - 16
 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Short Scripts  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006