SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is May 21st, 2024, 5:29am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Halloween III - Season of the Witch Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 8 Guests

 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Halloween III - Season of the Witch  (currently 1523 views)
R.E._Freak
Posted: February 4th, 2004, 2:13pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Written and Directed by: Tommy Lee Wallace (IT)
Starring: Tom Atkins, Stacey Nelkin

Alright, let me first say: what is the fuss about? Sure, it isn't the greatest movie ever made, but what do you expect from something with 'Halloween' and 'Witch' both in the same title?

The original idea behind 'Halloween' was that each Halloween (thus) a new movie with the Halloween name would be released, each with a different Halloween-themed story. The people wanted new, they got new, they got different, and they didn't like it. I liked it, it was a good attempt at taking the series in a different direction, whereas now it's just the same thing over and over again. They missed their chance with this, if they had just left Myers out of it and kept doing original stuff.

Directed by Tommy Lee Wallace (which I instantly didn't like, as he was responsible for the horrible Stephen King adaptation IT, which was so boring I couldn't even manage to vomit) and starring Carpenter regular Tom Atkins, there's not much to it other than the bad guy wants to use masks and a stone from stone henge to wipe out people for some reason. . . yeah.

It's got good acting, it's produced and scored by the maestro himself, and it's actually pretty gory. Heads explode, are pulled apart, people are crushed, and there's the scene where the boy's head implodes and bugs and snakes emerge in the hundreds. Pretty nasty.

Sure, it isn't the best movie ever made, but it does beat some of the later Halloween movies. And the ending is great. 'STOP IT! PLEASE! STOP IIIIIIIIIIIIIT!'

*** out of ****
Logged
e-mail
AmericanSyCo
Posted: February 23rd, 2004, 11:07pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



While I liked the idea that they did in fact try something new rather than the same old, same old "There's [INSERT KILLER'S NAME]!  Run!," I still think that this one was just a little too ridiculous.  The most dissapointing aspect is that perhaps this could have been a great paranoia/horror flick.  The story is good and there are a few moments of genuine creepiness (I love when the kid's head implodes), but still, the cheese was just layed on a bit too thick.

Perhaps if John Carpenter had directed, this could of been a solid fright film.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 1 - 15
FSKessler
Posted: February 24th, 2004, 4:30pm Report to Moderator
New


Location
Kansas City, Mo
Posts
93
Posts Per Day
0.01
In my opinion, HALLOWEEN 3 is horrible...so horrible it's funny.


FS (Scott) Kessler
"Get excited Motherf**ker!" -
Rocco in The Boondock Saints
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM Reply: 2 - 15
the goose
Posted: February 24th, 2004, 4:40pm Report to Moderator
New


Yippie-kay-ay.

Location
London
Posts
297
Posts Per Day
0.04
The first is the best. no doubts.


"We don't make movies for critics, since they don't pay to see them anyhow."

-- Charles Bronson.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 15
Luciddream
Posted: February 24th, 2004, 5:10pm Report to Moderator
New


Posts
4
Posts Per Day
0.00
Halloween 3 (and all the Halloweens besides the first one for that matter) Blow like a korean whore...

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 15
R.E._Freak
Posted: February 25th, 2004, 12:27pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Sucky sucky, five dorrars. Me ruv roo rong time soldier boy.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 5 - 15
the goose
Posted: February 25th, 2004, 1:41pm Report to Moderator
New


Yippie-kay-ay.

Location
London
Posts
297
Posts Per Day
0.04
Yeah. Which one was it when Sheriff Meeker died?


"We don't make movies for critics, since they don't pay to see them anyhow."

-- Charles Bronson.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 15
R.E._Freak
Posted: February 25th, 2004, 2:33pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Part 4.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 7 - 15
TylerDurden1544
Posted: February 25th, 2004, 4:25pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



isnt part 3 the one with Michaels neice that is psychic, well which ever one that is terrible
Logged
e-mail Reply: 8 - 15
Chris_MacGuffin
Posted: November 28th, 2004, 8:20pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


Check out The Last Days Of The Desert Dogs

Location
Wherever I may be
Posts
998
Posts Per Day
0.14
Part three has nothing to do with Myers, your thinking of part five.
All of the Halloweens besides the first one are pretty lame. Part three was a standout in the bad movie factor.
Logged Offline
Private Message AIM YIM Windows Live Messenger Reply: 9 - 15
Jason Byram
Posted: December 30th, 2004, 6:22pm Report to Moderator
New


Location
Ireland
Posts
54
Posts Per Day
0.01
What the fuck is the point in making a Halloween movie without the appearance of Michael Meyers, it makes no sense. It's like making Scream 4:

SCREAM 4 PLOT:
All the Ghostface masks come to smothering anyone who wears them. And it has no Neve Campbell, Dave Arquette or Courtney Cox.

This was complete balls and should never have been part of the Halloween series.

Halloween (197 and Halloween: H20 (199 are the best.

Has anyone heard that they're making another (it's getting waaay farfetched now tho!). But I dont see the point in making another one when Laurie Strode is dead and Jamie Lee-Curtis has retired from acting.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 15
Scoob
Posted: January 25th, 2005, 4:51am Report to Moderator
Been Around


Location
UK
Posts
583
Posts Per Day
0.08
I LOVE THIS FILM!

Sorry for the caps, but I have admired this one since I was seven years old and this was the first horror film I ever saw.

This film has the same atmosphere as the original two, and the cinematography is again outstanding .

The storyline is fine to me, and the villain conol cochran was played excellently, I love that little speech he makes at the end of the film about witchcraft.

This has more right to the title of "Halloween" then any of the others as it actually has something to do with the season itself, rather then Michael Myers doing his thing again.

I'm a massive fan of the Halloween series, own them all on dvd and video and have a daft ammount of alternative cuts (which is very little).

But it always upsets me slightly when Halloween 3 gets so much critism, often just for being different to the Myers escapades.

The first three Halloween films are the best in my opinion thanks to John Carpenter , Debra Hill and a few others that seemed to have a real family vibe going back then in the early 80s, and although this is a different story, the feeling and mood remains similar.

The series was dead for a good few years after this bombed at the box office however until 1988 when part 4 brought back Mr. Myers again, whereas I love the masked psycho, maybe a different Halloween tale every so often ain't such a bad idea.

Especially after the last one.

Cheers, take it easy



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 15
Balt
Posted: January 25th, 2005, 4:59am Report to Moderator
Guest User



I kinda have to agree with SCOOB here... it's a stand out in the series.  I don't love it, not like he does, but it is a different take and one that is rather interesting to watch.

Michael Myers is just a means to an end and I thought the end of part 2 was brilliant in it, we weren't given even a glimmer of hope he'd return.  I love Halloween 1 and 2, I feel they are 1 long movie as they were filmed so close together and it shows... I just feel that Halloween 3 had more to offer than any Halloween.

This is just my opinion, however...

Also, the story behind the making of Halloween 3 is interesting aswell... I can't remember it now, but I do remember they had a really good reason as to why it didn't include Myers and the whole Strode saga.

I'll dig that up and post it for you all.

C.K.

Good thoughts~
Logged
e-mail Reply: 12 - 15
Scoob
Posted: January 25th, 2005, 5:11am Report to Moderator
Been Around


Location
UK
Posts
583
Posts Per Day
0.08
From what I have gathered over the years, John Carpenter didn't even want to do Halloween 2 (in fact he has stated he wrote it in one night with a six pack of beer) and was therefore staggered to be asked to make a third one a year later.

I think the conditions Carpenter laid out was that he would do it as long as the previous two films were completly forgotten, and as R.E. Freak posted at the top, they would bring out a new Halloween with a fresh script each time.

There is loads on this on the actual website, which is surprisingly pretty popular.
http://www.halloweenmovies.com

Cheers



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 15
larkin
Posted: January 25th, 2005, 10:40am Report to Moderator
New



Posts
10
Posts Per Day
0.00
I absolutely hated Halloween 3. Strangely enough, it's got a cult following though.


Why can't we not be sober?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 15
 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006