Great story here about what appears to be someone talking on a mobile phone at least sixty years before they existed.

Of course, they could have been talking to God, or one of those Jame Bond types with some heavily advanced tech.

http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/blog/article/57334/time-traveller-spotted-at-chaplin-premiere.html

Personally I'll plump for looney talking to his wrist while simultaneously itching cheek conclusion. Try saying that with half a bottle of Scotland's finest single malt in you.

Took me ten minutes to type the bloody thing.

I need a secretary. Preferably one that looks like Winslet, and talks like Tatou. Or an Natalie Portman lookylikey will do. Hang on, that'll me I just flirt or worse all day and night.

Nothing new there then, I hear.

Ahum

R ox

It's probably John Titor.

Probably looking for Sarah Connor's grandmother....


Phil

I believe the "cell phone" is this...

http://hearing.siemens.com/sg/10-about-us/01-our-history/milestones.jsp?year=1924

I think there's a movie premise in this story...somewhere...in time. =p

E.D.

She does appear to be talking, so the hearing aid explanation doesn't wash.

And, upon seeing this video, I'm sure Hollywood is working on the movie.


Phil

That's because she's saying: "This is sooooo fucking awesome. I can hear. I CAN HEAR!" or "Fuck me, that's one fucked up hat I'm wearing".

I remember when Phil was just a sock.

These days he's a blonde time traveller stuck in a loop near a beach.

It is more annoying than me when drunk and obnoxious.

I should know.

R ox

Quoted from screenrider I knew it... SimplyScripts ain't nothin' but a bunch of Time Travellers in disguise.

Yep. We're just wearing protective screens so that our other reality doesn't screw us up in this one.   Ummm.... but the screw up theory is a wash up.

Sandra

That blonde time traveler is Gary Busey which makes the image even more annoying.  

Re: the Chaplin thing it's kind of cool and a bit hard to explain.  Though as a colleague of mine at work said "The only proof of time travel that we seem to need is a woman holding on to her hat."

Here's a very interesting blog post.

http://forgetomori.com/2010/fortean/time-traveler-caught-in-museum-photo/  

The blog post was bad, Cornetto.  The blogger compares the 'travelers' eyeglasses with Barbara Stanwycks' when they aren't the same.  His is the wrap around kind; hers only looks like wrap around as light is passing through the lens and around her face.  The camera, I'm not too sure about.


Phil

Quoted from dogglebe The blog post was bad, Cornetto.  The blogger compares the 'travelers' eyeglasses with Barbara Stanwycks' when they aren't the same.  His is the wrap around kind; hers only looks like wrap around as light is passing through the lens and around her face.  The camera, I'm not too sure about. Phil

So then maybe he is a time traveler.

Maybe he is.

Now that's cool.

R ox

Maybe that's what Barbara Stanwyck wants us to think...


Phil

Stanwyck, as we all know in Eire, was the original time traveller.

We just don't tell aliens often. Which is what they call us at JFK, often. Barstards.

R ox