All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Fugitive Sweetheart by Vincent Paterno - Romantic Comdy - A reporter learns his copy editor's actually a former school classmate with a new identity in a witness protection program. Her cover is blown, the ex she imprisoned seeks revenge and the reporter and staff protect her. 104 pages - pdf format
A reporter learns his copy editor's actually a former school classmate with a new identity in a witness protection program. Her cover is blown, the ex she imprisoned seeks revenge and the reporter and staff protect her.
I read it three times and still didn't quite get it. Is it:
When a Newspaper editor in the Witness Protection Program cover is blown, she must rely on a Reporter to protect her from the vengeful ex-husband she help to imprison.
There are quite a few nitty problems on the first two pages.
Quoted Text
DUANE LLEWELLYN (47), disheveled in a maroon sweatshirt and blue jeans, is at a window seat. He types on his laptop. A glance over his shoulder shows he’s at work on a screenplay.
Lose the color of his clothes - it's unimportant. Also doesn't matter if he's at a window seat. I'd go with something akin to:
DUANE LLEWELLYN (47), disheveled, clad in sweatshirt and blue jeans types on his laptop in his seat.
Quoted Text
The CONDUCTOR (52), a relaxed black man, walks through the passenger car.
CONDUCTOR Our next stop: Bethel, Colorado. Bethel, our first stop in Colorado!
He's relaxed - but you have him yelling!
Quoted Text
Duane, jolted, quickly rises from his seat. He saves the work on his laptop and stores it in a briefcase. He retrieves a suitcase from the compartment above him.
Action out of order - he'd save the work on his laptop before getting out of his seat.
Quoted Text
CONDUCTOR So you’re stopping off here today.
Typo - needs a ?
Quoted Text
CONDUCTOR (CONT’D) OK, sir, you can get off.
Should be okay.
Quoted Text
Duane enters the vestibule and turns right, not looking where he’s going. He nearly stumbles down the stairs, not realizing the exit is two feet higher than the platform. The conductor grabs him and his luggage before he tumbles out.
- should be The Conductor.
Quoted Text
DUANE Or Philadelphia, where I first boarded before changing trains in Chi-town.
To my ear - a bit unnatural response here. He nearly falls and he's explaining his prior stops?
Quoted Text
Duane gives the conductor a salute; a few seconds later the train leaves the station. He strolls down Main Street and passes the town's public library. None of the buildings are more than four stories high, and things appear quiet.
- The Conductor - Problem - you need a new scene header here. You are no longer inside the train.
Quoted Text
That suddenly changes when a stray baseball strikes the suitcase he's carrying and caroms back into the park where a few boys play catch. He turns to them, gently shakes his head and smiles.
And another scene - the Park. Also - BOYS should be CAPPED.
Quoted Text
INT. BETHEL HOTEL ROOM - NIGHT
Duane is at his laptop, again at work on his screenplay, when his cellphone rings. It’s old East Coast pal JIM LINDQUIST.
Old East Coast Pal is a bit of an unfilmable. i.e., What's on the screen that tells us this?
Lose the color of his clothes - it's unimportant. Also doesn't matter if he's at a window seat. I'd go with something akin to:
DUANE LLEWELLYN (47), disheveled, clad in sweatshirt and blue jeans types on his laptop in his seat.
Sorry to knit pick - You advised him to remove the clothing colour, and then in your example you include a colour. Also, why tell us detail of what he is wearing anyway - they are normal clothes, doesn't tell me anything about the character - Unless what he is wearing is relevant later on?
I'm not going to lie, I have hardly read this as I don't think its my thing. But, from what I have seen, the action can be more condensed and flow better to make easier reading. The dialogue to me seems unnatural.
The protagonist also starts the movie writing a screenplay - Is this not a bit cliche? - Anyway, a quick search for the word "screenplay" in your screenplay and you use the word 5 times, but not past page 5! If it is not important to the story then don't include it, useless information is the enemy
Sorry to knit pick - You advised him to remove the clothing colour, and then in your example you include a colour. Also, why tell us detail of what he is wearing anyway - they are normal clothes, doesn't tell me anything about the character - Unless what he is wearing is relevant later on?
Blue Jeans is a common term used for denims. That's why I didn't harp on it - think that would have been over the top. Of course denims or jeans would have been fine as well. I assume in this example the writer is using clothing to let us know that this character ain't your typical businessman, Harvard writer - etc. Just a dude in sweats and jeans. Casual guy.
But nothing else leads me to believe he is a business man, so why would he need to clarify to the contrary?
If it's important to show he is casually dressed, can't he just say casually dressed? Maybe it's just me, but if a typical reader is given the description 'casually dressed' then they are able to come to their own conclusions of what that might be without being spoon fed - Makes reading it more fluid
I also noticed you include a line "About 5 seconds pass" - Just think about that for a second, that means the viewers will be sitting there, watching nothing happen for 5 seconds - that's a long time for a viewer.
To be honest, the whole interaction with the train conductor feels unnecessary - all it reveals to us that is relevant is that he is attending a job interview - but he reveals that in the phone call in the next scene - and then it's revealed again at the actual interview
But nothing else leads me to believe he is a business man, so why would he need to clarify to the contrary?
If it's important to show he is casually dressed, can't he just say casually dressed? Maybe it's just me, but if a typical reader is given the description 'casually dressed' then they are able to come to their own conclusions of what that might be without being spoon fed - Makes reading it more fluid
I also noticed you include a line "About 5 seconds pass" - Just think about that for a second, that means the viewers will be sitting there, watching nothing happen for 5 seconds - that's a long time for a viewer.
To be honest, the whole interaction with the train conductor feels unnecessary - all it reveals to us that is relevant is that he is attending a job interview - but he reveals that in the phone call in the next scene - and then it's revealed again at the actual interview
Don't think a reader will care about the difference between casually dressed vs. Sweatshirt and blue jeans. I simply prefer the latter since there are varying styles of casual. Either way is fine.
The seconds pass is not my line. It's the writers.
You might be right on the conductor. Who knows. Since we've only read a few pages, we have no idea whether this is a prominent character or not. If it is not - I agree.
Yes i know it is the writers line - Sorry, I switched who I was talking to without making it clear lol
My favourite tool when reading scripts is the 'find' function - one quick search shows me that that character doesn't appear again.
it appears he is only there as a "tell me" character - it would be much more powerful if we were shown - I.E don't have the conductor tell me this is a nearly unused station in the middle of nowhere - show me that no one else gets off, the platform is small rundown/deserted