All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
I immediately thought I was going to either "really like" or "love" this film especially with its catchy opening credits theme and montage of the Colorado town, BUT what made me gasp was at how horrible the acting was. REALLY, I mean REALLY bad...but that was thrown in my face as the bad acting from the characters is actually intentional in the first 10 minutes.
So here's the story:
5 friends stage a prank on July 4th at a carnivale in their hometown which ultimately leads to a friends death. The remaining 4 agree to never reveal that they were the conspirators behind this prank and 1 year later, they are stalked and killed.
The actors and the characters they portray are decent enough, especially for this type of film. The two female leads are interesting, but the "best friend" character had the most development and I found myself rooting for her rather than the lead. The style of the film is very stylish and uses great colors and settings BUT there is too much usage of quick cuts, it becomes annoying and gets in the way of trying to follow certain sequences of action.
There is PLENTY of cheap scares throughout, none even remotely scary or suspenseful. The killings are bloody, but nothing original or great...or even effective for that matter. AND the ending is laughable.
Overall its entertaining, but in a bad movie sense.
I gave this one a viewing after watching the first two, and to be honest, I didn't find it to be as bad as everyone was afraid it was going to be. I always tend to review from a story perspective, rarely getting into production stuff unless it becomes distracting.
This version has nothing to do with the "Last Summer" mentioned in the first two films. It rather uses those films as a backstory to provide a foundation to what happens in this one. At one point in the film, they pull out a scrapbook of sorts of articles mentioning "the fisherman" and the murders committed in the coastal town and Bahamas island of the first two films.
This film opens with the "fisherman" story and a chase through a fairground (and by the way, what the hell is with all these fairs? Is 2006 the year of the fair or something? Final Destination 3, When A Stranger Calls...anyway) until he corners one of the friends on top of a building. Well, this friend miscalculates his escape and ends up impaled on the top of a tractor. We learn that this fisherman chase is a big prank, but one that, with the death of the friend, has gone horribly wrong.
It begins to stand out more as a remake when many of the characters'...well, characters...resemble the four of the original film. This, however, does not detract from the enjoyment of the film, but rather serves to add to it, since it provides a sort of grim familiarity to what's going on.
One concern I started to have was how this killer can be everywhere. He pops up in the strangest places, and at one point, he attacks our heroine on a gondola quite a few feet above the ground. I was all set the poo-poo the ridiculousness of this whole unlikely crap when finally the reveal came. As with all of these teen scream flicks, there's a question mark leading us through the film of whodunit and this one is no different. It points the finger quite deliberately at just about everyone within the plot, revealing that their "secret" was not much of a secret at all. Several other people knew about the prank and knew who was behind it. What did this do? Give our fisherman more fodder to hack up. The reveal did what it should do: clean up the loose ends it was dangling throughout the film and allow what appeared to be stupidity to get itself to making sense.
I will admit that the film provided very little suspense, and barely classifies itself as a horror movie. It's kind of like the latter Nightmare on Elm Street films where it's basically a low-key action movie, and accepting it from this perspective will add to its enjoyment. You want a horror movie? Well, it has some blood in it, I guess.
Take it for what it is: a continuation/remake of the best part of a franchise, and a decent enough twist to give it its own legs to stand on. It's not the greatest film ever made, but it was a fun romp to chew up an hour and a half. The way they worked the franchise was just the next logical step it had to take.