SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 25th, 2024, 7:27pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Ghosts of Girlfriends Past Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 7 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    Ghosts of Girlfriends Past  (currently 370 views)
Dreamscale
Posted: April 20th, 2010, 6:41pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



I had the displeasure of watching this via Netflix with my girlfriend the other night.  Boy was I surprised how it all played out.

I was considering starting a thread entitled, "WTF?", and having it based on what is going on in Big Hollywood's minds in green lighting and filming such garbage...and I still may, but for now, I'll give a few comments on this "romantic comedy".

It's slickly produced and put together, has an all star cast, and is actually funny at times.  It also ends exactly as everyone knows it will, which caters to the audience it was obviously made for.  But other than that, it's such a huge misfire, it's literally shocking.

As far as I can tell, it had a budget north of $150 Million, which is a monstrous problem from the get go.  It made about $55 Million here in NA, and another $50 Million or so overseas, meaning it was a huge financial bomb.  How could a romantic comedy with Mathew McConaughey, Jennifer Garner, Michael Douglas, and a bunch of recognizable, beautiful people bomb like this?

Simple...the script.  It's terrible. It's shockingly offensive to everyone.  It doesn't cater to its target audience at all.  And, it seems as if it started out as an R rated script that got changed into a PG 13 movie, that still comes off as a mild R movie.

I'm actually very surprised it got away with a PG 13 rating.  There's so much sex, sexual situations, sexual slang, and such a downright mean spirit in it, that I bet most women who saw it, expecting a light hearted romp, left pissed off, or downright offended.

The acting was actually pretty good.  The set pieces were well done.  The special effects were good and the make up was also top notch.  It's the story, the tone, and the delivery that was just God awful.

I actually laughed a number of times at the absurdity of several scenes...even some of the jokes.  My girlfriend was pretty quiet and I kept asking her if she liked it or thought it was funny...she didn't, and she's the intended audience.  Unreal.

So, my questions are...WTF is wrong with the Hollywood brass who allowed this thing into the world?  What were all the stars possibly thinking when they signed on for this?  What were the producers thinking when they opened up their wallets?  Who in their right mind thought this was actually going to turn a profit?  WTF?????

Unreal...simply unreal.
Logged
e-mail
dresseme
Posted: April 20th, 2010, 6:51pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



It was written by the same duo that wrote The Hangover.  I'm actually surprised they wrote such a well received (critically as well as by mainstream audiences) script as The Hangover but then also wrote such critically panned films as Four Christmases & Rebound w/ Martin Lawrence.

Revision History (1 edits)
dresseme  -  April 20th, 2010, 7:19pm
Logged
e-mail Reply: 1 - 5
James McClung
Posted: April 21st, 2010, 1:59am Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Washington, D.C.
Posts
3293
Posts Per Day
0.48

Quoted from dresseme
It was written by the same duo that wrote The Hangover.  I'm actually surprised they wrote such a well received (critically as well as by mainstream audiences) script as The Hangover but then also wrote such critically panned films as Four Christmases & Rebound w/ Martin Lawrence.


Director Todd Phillips rewrote most of the script with a friend of his, including adding the baby, police car and Mike Tyson's tiger. They didn't receive credit based on WGA rules. A lot of the actors improvised and contributed jokes as well, including Zach Galifinakis who seems to be the film's star. Honestly, I don't think the writers had much to do with the film's success.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 5
Colkurtz8
Posted: April 21st, 2010, 5:31am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
--> Over There
Posts
1731
Posts Per Day
0.30
What!? You're telling me y'all aren't swooned by Matthew McConaughey trillion dollar smile and casual one note delivery!? But he's sooo hot!


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 5
Dreamscale
Posted: April 21st, 2010, 9:14am Report to Moderator
Guest User



I actually think McConaughey is a good actor and has great star presence.  It was his character in this movie that was just downright ridiculous.

Based on Dressel's comments, I'm lead to believe that it was a case of the old power of a name in Hollywood.  Thye seem to think that just because someone has had success in the past, anything they churn out will be gold.

It's most likely why Hollywood is the way it is...once you're in, you're in, but how you get in, is beyond me.

BULLSHIT!!!!
Logged
e-mail Reply: 4 - 5
Scar Tissue Films
Posted: April 21st, 2010, 11:25am Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3382
Posts Per Day
0.63
I'd be extremely wary of making any comedy for such a lot of money...seems to miss the point of what makes comedy successful to my way of thinking.

From what you've said it's taken over $100M at the BO. That's a decent amount in of itself. If they'd made it for a more reasonable 30-50M (even that seems a lot to me for a comedy) then the situation wouldn't be so bad.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 5
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006