SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 26th, 2024, 12:21am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  The Dark Half - 1993 - Steaming on Netflix Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 6 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    The Dark Half - 1993 - Steaming on Netflix  (currently 804 views)
Dreamscale
Posted: January 25th, 2012, 10:27am Report to Moderator
Guest User



Funny, I just finished reading The Dark Half Sunday night (I've had it in my collection since it came out, but for some odd reason, never finished it), and saw it was just added to Netflix streaming sometime over the weekend.  So, I thought, what perfect timing for a watch and comparison.

First of all, like the novel, I've never watched the entire movie.  I've seen bits and pieces, but always baled for some reason...or maybe slept through it?  Not sure, but either way, I've been familiar with the story for many years, be it through the novel or the film.

In case some aren't familiar, Stephen King wrote this novel in 1989, in between The Tommyknockers and Needful Things.  At its heart, this is a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde type story, but King did a fairly good job on twisting it up and completely making it his own.  The film adaptation went to our old friend George A Romero, who wrote the screenplay and directed as well, revising his relationship with King from 1982's Creepshow.

Although I was not overly impressed with the novel, it still held my attention, painted lots of great visuals and memorable images, and worked for what it was meant to be.

I can't say anything positive for the film adaptation, although I've seen lots of praise online.

As I've said before, IMO, King's works are tough to transfer to film.  The guy's a great writer and the images he paints into your brain just don't come across very impressively on film (most of the time).  He's also such a thorough writer, who gives so much backstory and detail that the movie adaptations feel like a summary of the events, and the characters like cardboard cutouts of who we grew to know so well in the novel.

IMO, everything's a frickin' mess here.  The acting, first of all is not good.  The FX are poor to terrible.  The sets are weak and poorly imagined.  The dialogue completely unconvincing.  The scenes and scene transitions are terrible.  But worst of all, the story (the adapted script) is just awful - a terrible job from Romero and I'm shocked King even allowed this to get made like this.

There are so many huge omissions and changes, that at times, it feels like it was based on the crib notes of the novel.  Just a disaster, IMO.

There's almost zero tension or horror throughout.  Timothy Hutton is not remotely convincing as the main Protag, but far less convincing as the Antag, George Stark.  The finale is downright comical.

Such a disappointment.  Now I remember why I never got through this in its entirety...or just didn't remember it if I did, as there's nothing here worth remembering other than another great Stephen King opportunity completely squandered.

Revision History (1 edits)
Dreamscale  -  January 26th, 2012, 11:42am
Logged
e-mail
leitskev
Posted: January 25th, 2012, 12:30pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Posts
3113
Posts Per Day
0.63
Tommyknockers killed Stephen King for me for about 20 years. It started out good, but then it seemed to just keep dragging on, and it felt too...Stephen Kingish if that makes any sense. His schtick was getting too well worn. He was writing 400 page stories that should have been half that.

But I did go back a few years ago when I stumbled on one of his Dark Tower series books. Worth reading.

Never ban much of a fan of his horror films, though. Non horror, like Green Mile and Stand By Me are classics though. I don't recall if I've seen Dark Half. I only remember something similar with Liam Neeson, but that was some comic book thing.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 3
BoinTN
Posted: January 26th, 2012, 11:08am Report to Moderator
New


Posts
93
Posts Per Day
0.02
I didn't bother with the recent miniseries, but Bag of Bones is a very solid read from King's later works.  And his adaptations to film are spotty, but there are some pretty remarkable translations, not the least of which is Shawshank Redemption, though for pure scares you could do a lot worse than Tobe Hooper's 'Salem's Lot.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 3
DarrenJamesSeeley
Posted: January 27th, 2012, 10:08am Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Michigan.USA
Posts
1522
Posts Per Day
0.31
While I disagree that most adaptations of King (or those done by King himself) are poor, I do agree Dark Half was a disappointment to me when I first saw it. I watched it again last year (sadly, it was a P/S version) but my thoughts remained the same.

I'll always love the adaps of Dead Zone (the one directed by Cronenberg) Cujo and Christine. I have a guilty pleasure in Graveyard Shift. I thought both versions of The Shining were outstanding. The Mist was great.

This stunk. Not as ugly as Children Of the Corny, not as bad as Dreamcatcher...but somewhere between.


"I know you want to work for Mo Fuzz. And Mo Fuzz wants you to. But first, I'm going to need to you do something for me... on spec." - Mo Fuzz, Tapeheads, 1988
my scripts on ss : http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1095531482/s-45/#num48
The Art!http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-knowyou/m-1190561532/s-105/#num106
Logged Offline
Site Private Message AIM YIM Reply: 3 - 3
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006