SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 26th, 2024, 2:47am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Jurassic Park - structure and timing Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 6 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Jurassic Park - structure and timing  (currently 4493 views)
stevie
Posted: May 4th, 2013, 7:30pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Down Under
Posts
3441
Posts Per Day
0.61

Quoted from Ryan1
Very similar structure in Jaws and JP.  The opening, shocking death scene.  The authority figures who just don't "get" the danger that they're in.  The intellectual (Goldblum/Dreyfuss) who tries to warn them all.  The troubled everyman who winds up saving the day.

I think one difference to look at is how Spielberg first shows us the T-Rex versus the shark.  The T-Rex is this ominous buildup with the missing goat, the thudding footsteps.  In Jaws the shark comes out of absolute nowhere from the chum.  Tension versus pure shock.  Both techniques work beautifully.    



Actually, RL, we see the shark earlier, albeit it briefly, when it eats the guy in the pond. And it looks very much like a real shark ( they used different mech sharks, some were only half ones, they seemed to look the best).  Not that this movie is my fave of all time or anything, lol...

I remember reading the JP novel in one day while I was on holidays, then saw the film the next week. Great film, but I've always rated the book as 'better'. A scene where the T Rex swims in the river to chase them wasnt used in the film, prolly because of the logistics.

The JP 2 novel as great too but the film turned out averge.



Logged
Private Message Reply: 15 - 20
stevie
Posted: May 4th, 2013, 7:33pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients



Location
Down Under
Posts
3441
Posts Per Day
0.61

Quoted from B.C.



In the last week or so Scripshadow has given a 'wasn't for me' rating to scripts written by Sophia Coppola and William Goldman and 'what the hell did I just read' to a script by David Lynch.

What I learned?

Question everything. Especially the internets.

Back on topic, Aliens is similar.  How long before the first Xenomorph?  More than an hour?











Yeah it would about an hour I guess, if you count it coming out of John Hurt's guts as the first sighting.



Logged
Private Message Reply: 16 - 20
Ryan1
Posted: May 4th, 2013, 8:12pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Posts
1098
Posts Per Day
0.22

Quoted from stevie



Actually, RL, we see the shark earlier, albeit it briefly, when it eats the guy in the pond. And it looks very much like a real shark ( they used different mech sharks, some were only half ones, they seemed to look the best).  Not that this movie is my fave of all time or anything, lol...

I remember reading the JP novel in one day while I was on holidays, then saw the film the next week. Great film, but I've always rated the book as 'better'. A scene where the T Rex swims in the river to chase them wasnt used in the film, prolly because of the logistics.

The JP 2 novel as great too but the film turned out averge.


True we get a quick glimpse of the shark chomping the sailboat guy's leg off.  But we never got the full on shot of the shark until the chum scene.  

JP2 is a film I'd rather forget ever happened.

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 17 - 20
irish eyes
Posted: May 4th, 2013, 8:54pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group


There`s too much blood in my alcohol

Location
Upstate New York
Posts
1865
Posts Per Day
0.36
I remember watching a documentary on Spielberg and he claimed the reason the shark wasn't seen more often was because the mechanical shark broke and sank

So he had to shoot it from the perspective of the shark to make up lost time and in doing so created a lot more suspenseful movie...  which all worked out in his favor

Mark


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 20
Manowar
Posted: June 6th, 2013, 8:28am Report to Moderator
New



Location
New England
Posts
56
Posts Per Day
0.01

Quoted from Forgive
this wasn't pitched, and rumour has it that bids for the rights were going out before it was even published ...


The story I heard (whether true or not) was that Crichton was pitching Spielberg this "medical drama" of his that Spielberg passed on, and eventually became the TV show "ER." Spielberg asked him what else he had and Crichton said something along the lines of "..well I have this dinosaur story."

Regardless of how it went to film, I like the comparisons others in the thread have made to "Jaws." And I don't see the problems in structure in either, in regards that they don't give you the chaos until later in the script. Both do a fantastic job of creating suspense, giving you just enough intrigue to anticipate something huge down the road. They're both very Hitchcock-like in that respect. They gave us intriguing characters in intriguing circumstances, and laid enough intriguing bread crumbs to keep us watching (or reading).

Having said that, yeah if this was a spec script from a Nobody, some studio hack might've insisted on showing the "naughty bits" earlier. Thank God it was put together by people with clout who knew the story stood on its own.

Incidentally, the novel was also fantastic, and I would say even better than the movie (as most novels are) if not for the CGI that made these dinos life-like for me, and the incredible cinematography and score (John Williams, again, wasn't it?). I think the only other movies I've enjoyed better than the books were "Godfather" and "Tell No One."

Hope to see JP in 3D before it's gone--or maybe it already is. Has anybody seen it in an I-Max yet?

Logged
Private Message Reply: 19 - 20
Manowar
Posted: June 6th, 2013, 8:31am Report to Moderator
New



Location
New England
Posts
56
Posts Per Day
0.01

Quoted from irish eyes
I remember watching a documentary on Spielberg and he claimed the reason the shark wasn't seen more often was because the mechanical shark broke and sank

So he had to shoot it from the perspective of the shark to make up lost time and in doing so created a lot more suspenseful movie...  which all worked out in his favor

Mark


The DVD extras I watched confirm this. A happy accident that worked in his favor. Shark wouldn't work and he had to shoot without it till later in the film. Wonder what his initial intentions for the film were, specifically, when and how he planned to first introduce the full-fledged shark.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 20 - 20
 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006