All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
You're missing a title page. The dialogue seems forced and unrealistic. There are some errors in formatting and some spelling errors that need to be fixed.
Those errors aside, I don't get it. Sam's vengeance (your title is misspelled) on the guy who killed his family in an accident was to key his car, give him a flat tire, put trash on his lawn, and throw eggs at his car? It just doesn't really make sense and is pretty weak vengeance.
Personally, I didn't care fot his at all. Maybe others will have a different point of view.
Hi Gerry seen you post on the site a number of times, and you have give some confident reviews & raised some interesting points, so I thought I check this out.
I'm thinking that this is probably a fairly early script - you've got a lot of the basics, but I think some refining might be needed.
Overall the story is there - I'm not saying that the story is great, but the principal structure is outlined - there's some intrigue, cause, effect, motivation and so on.
Mehdoh's pointed out that the vengeance itself is doesn't sit neatly with the cause - so maybe that's something to look out for in the future.
Whilst your take on the story is fairly sound - there's very little to be said of the characters. The script is very short, and there's probably a little room to give the characters a bit of 'body' - something that we can relate to - maybe Jack could have a buddy or a girlfriend - a relationship that is collapsing, so that this is all happening on top of that - this would enable you to give Jack (and/or friend) some dialogue so that we could see what kind of character he is.
On the formatting & stuff - there were some minors here and there that could easily be tidied up:
## JACK (20s, clean and tidy; trousers, shirt and tie) -- could easily be JACK (25), smart suit. - but maybe also go for a little more physical description so that there's a visual in the reader's mind.
## brief case in one hand, shopping bag in the other. -- This changes to satchel, later on, so one for consistency.
## In the shadows; the figure of Sam. -- In the shadows - the figure of Sam. A debatable one this, but many people go for avoiding semi-colons in script-writing - it slows the reader down a little. Using the dash almost encourages the reader, like pointing an arrow to the next bit.
## Jack driving. Jack is visibly angry. -- Jack likes clapping. Jack is happy.
INT. JACK'S CAR - NIGHT Jack driving. Jack is visibly angry.
-- This kind of thing can bug some people - others don't have an issue with it. Maybe try:
INT. JACK'S CAR - MOVING - NIGHT Jack is seething.
Removes the 'Jack is driving bit' and the 'visibly' - which is obvious as we've a camera stuck in his face.
## Jack hoses the rear glass clean. -- this kinda comes out of nowhere - possible to have a LATER stuck in.
## Though unrecognised by Jack, the car from outside Jack's house in the traffic ahead. -- I'm not too sure this bit makes sense ...
JACK (angrily) It's called a fucking accelerator! (beat) Retard! -- Your (beat) wryly should be formatted as per your (angrily) one, and then 'Retard' needs to go on another line.
I don't want to go on sound too negative, as there's lots of good points - action lines are generally short and to the point - new shots are brought in with a new action lines, and generally the slugs are short and to the point. So I'd see this a point from which to improve really - lots of positives, so best of luck going forward.
I apologize in advance for repeating what anybody else might have said, so far. I've had a skim-read of the comments and there is a possibility that I'll repeat Simon on this one.
Some of your sentences I tripped over, meaning I had to go back and decipher them, which is never a pleasant experience...
Page 1: " Surrounded by office buildings, a three-quarter empty car park with a handful of nondescript OFFICE WORKERS walking to their cars or already driving." This sentence doesn't read well at all. You don't need to mention that we are in a car park as the slugline notifies us of that.
Page 2: " Though unrecognized by Jack, the car from outside Jack's house in the traffic ahead." - Didn't make sense at first. How does your audience know that the car is the car from outside Jack's house?
I noticed a few formatting issues. I usually don't comment on formatting as I am no guru myself, but here we go...
Page 1: JACK (yelling after car) Ya tool! Should be...
JACK (yelling after car) Ya tool!
Page 2:
JACK (yelling) What the f***!!!
Should be...
JACK (yelling) What the f***!!! * Also, as far as I know, using more than one exclamation mark is frowned upon in terms of grammar, but I could be wrong.
JACK (angrily) It's called a f****** accelerator! (beat) Retard!
Should be...
JACK (angrily) It's called a f****** accelerator! (beat) Retard!
"EXT. ROAD ACCIDENT - NIGHT" - Not quite sure how a road accident can be a setting. Try "HIGHWAY" or just "ROAD"
In general, this one didn't feel like a 3 page short. It took a while to read.
Sam's actions seem a bit childish IMO. Egging someone's car and keying them isn't exactly vengence on someone who's killed your kids. Personally, I'd take Sam's character a lot further than that.
With a bit of a clean up, I reckon this script will do quite well.
I have just started using the (newish) cloud version of Celtx, and it currently doesn't allow for title pages (although that is their first planned update); does the unusual page numbering and headers and footers (I explained that in the notes with my submission - I didn't realise those notes don't get posted - being my first submission). I'd check out Trelby, but currently use a Mac (no Mac version). This is actually the first script I have written from scratch; I'm usually Art Department; but am trying to extend my skills to benefit my students.
Wow! I left some woeful rookie mistakes! (Including typos even in the one-word title! WT? - eeeek (don't tell anyone I'm a teacher :/ ).
Clearly there wasn't 'vengeance' enough; I based the story (and the title) on the "vengeance stalker" definition (rather than a Batman-style hard core vengeance) - however Sam comes off as little more than a nuisance. I guess I limited myself due to the research I did on stalking laws - and how far Sam could take his actions before the law intervened (and also my limited imagination in these types of actions). I was trying to establish the two characters; an everyday guy and a stalker, then at the end, flip the tables on who the viewer thought was good/bad. Sam's behaviour was supposed to simply start as irritating, then scale up - but I can see I didn't quite get there. I think in the next rewrite; Sam will have a 'snap-point' where he takes it over the line...
I'll fix up the formatting issues, and build a more defined, determined 'vengeance'.
I'll certainly take a word of my own advice next time, and proofread