All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Convention of War by Eric Shipton - Short, Comedy, War - Lt. Ryan leads his platoon on an authorized mission to kill the enemy, but things don't go as planned. - pdf format
Interesting idea here but I was left a little confused on the tone. It seemed like a drama but the humor that was sprinkled through was a bit odd. Like campy, if that's the right word.
You did a good job with visual description but didn't mention snow until the end of page 3. You described mist twice, and i was thinking it was spring.
As for the characters, they kind of blended into one another. It was dialog heavy in some parts and for me, they all sounded the same.
The writing here is good, maybe a tad heavy but it was an easy read. And interesting story. In the end what didn't work for me was the disjointed tone and lack of character development. But solid effort, for sure.
I think it was OK but I think a lot of the dialogue could be cut. I also felt the introduction of the snake was, exactly how it felt, just thrown in so you could get all three elements in.
I liked the first half of this, seemed to be authentic in terms of use of gas... and I have no idea if that's true but the writer persuaded me that it was, so good job.
But the second half seemed to veer into a much more comedic vein and it just didn't fit well with what had gone before, imho of course.
Also, the snake, I mean that is shoehorning of the highest order - made me chuckle.
Writer knows what they are doing though, script reads nice and quick.
Great writing, it just feels like a script that's been shoehorned in to meet this OWC, especially the snake.
It's dialogue-heavy and yet didn't help move the story along at all. You could cut most of the talking and not lose anything. I didn't buy the incompetent gas attack because of the tone shifting and it ended abruptly.
Great descriptions and easy to follow action. It just didn't work for me overall.
For more of my scripts, stories, produced movies and the ocassional blog, check out my new website. CLICK
Um... Uh... Well... I thought it was good. And I'm not a big war fan, either, so success there. Pretty well written. Particularly the action descriptions. But... I too was left wondering about the tone of the story -- I'm guessing drama.
And second, yeah... I think you can easily lose at least 30% of the dialogue in this piece and replace it with more pointed smaller, visual and thematic components that suggest a specific agenda for your characters. If that makes sense.-Andrea
- The name intros in the dialogue feel clunky. - "What do you have against the Brits?" seems like an impertinent question at an inappropriate time. - A lot of standing and talking in these first five pages. Doesn't feel like there's a rising tension -- just a series of jokes. For this to feel madcap, I think things need to keep building on one another more.
Thoughts:
- Okay, satire from the Chris Morris/Armando Iannucci camp. As I've said above, I think the main thing missing is the sense of rising action -- the jokes don't build on one another so much as follow one another. - The goals of the characters are not really disparate enough, even in this context. This kind of comedy relies on imbalances of power and differences of motivation that are somewhat lacking here. The characters don't clash or try to assert power over one another very much, and the clusterfuck ends up feeling like less of a clusterfuck than it should because of that. - A bold attempt with some good dialogue. Nice.
Lots of standing around, talking. Worse, it's very minimalist. That's when characters are standing or sitting around, and the only action they really give is basic facial movements. Ryan laughs. Miller shakes his head.Miller frowns. Miller looks around. Miller nods...Ryan nods and so on. None of these near comatose action reveal anything about character. . Smile,Laugh. Look. Rinse, wash, repeat.
Tone wobbles from serious to comedy to drama to that irritating coda, meant as a punchline. I noticed that in dialog headers you tend toput each characters rank, yet in narrative those ranks are missing. Since there are no other Sergeants, corporals or lieutenants around, you can drop the rank abbreviations in the names-the last names will suffice.
Quoted Text
Then the men take their positions around the cylinders, eyes on Ryan, who stands off to one side. Ryan raises an arm, then cuts it down hard.
Action happens as it unfolds. There is no "then"
Not a terrible entry, but it should have been more engaging.
Ryan, 30, is aggressive but not overbearing. Miller, 22, is cynical and finds grim amusement at the folly that’s ensnared him.
Wow - sucks to be the actors in this - They have to stand on a hill and somehow convey that they are aggressive but not overbearing, cynical and grimly amused. Best of luck to them.
The snows a good insulator. what snow? is the hill covered in snow, might've mentioned it earlier...
Dialogue isn't great - forced and awkward.
Quoted Text
CPL. DAVIS What’s our story, again, sir?
Come on now, you're better than that.
by page 7 this goes from a reasonably interesting opening and falls flat on its face - doesn't seem recoverable to me but I'll plough on... No, didn't recover - it became farcical and absurd. Such a shame
The snake is pathetic, honestly - but why did you even bother with it? you had already met criteria 2 with the shovels they used to dig the holes (you didn't actually say they used shovels, but we can infer considering you told us they were carrying them)
Not really sure why you took this in the direction you did, it wasn't a direction I wanted to go from what the opening built up.
Everyone realized that this war and every war that was to follow in the 20th century was a banker’s war, but, these armchair warriors are to cowardice to fight their own battles so they sent innocent men and women to die on the battlefield for their own personal agenda. So, the masses, onto there scheme, rounded up all these little heart tyrants and threw them in prison forever… yeah, right.
Anyway, after that rant, I’m sure you’ll be happy to know that your script is top brass, pardon the pun. It’s difficult to write war tales because of all the detail involved, but you seem to know what your doing, and then some. I could bang on about what I liked et al. but I’m behind in reading so… excellent submission for a week’s notice!
Overall this wasn't bad, though you did shoehorn a snake in there for some reason. Anyway, I didn't get the comedy here. Just sounded like banter, and not bad at that. Thought this was pretty well written for the most part, good visuals, but the story and it's outcome didn't do it for me.
So, first of all, I like the writing; detailed and engaging, but also fast and to the point. The more serious first half came across as very authentic and drew me in.
The tone-switch seemed a bit sudden for me, although I did enjoy the humorous second half as well. I thought the dialogue was funny, although the characters felt a bit interchangeable. There's not a lot happening, though: the gas didn't have much of an impact and there isn't a lot of progress in any way. So I did enjoy the bits and pieces, but I'm not sure whether or not it works as a whole for me.