SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is May 5th, 2024, 5:20pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Screenwriting Discussion    Simplyscripts Collaborative Effort  ›  Slasher flicks, the New thread Moderators: Mr. Blonde
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 2 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 » : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Slasher flicks, the New thread  (currently 8291 views)
dogglebe
Posted: March 26th, 2006, 7:01pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from bert

There is red paint on the doors -- somebody speculates that "the wolves did it" -- another character says, with all seriousness, "Wolves can't reach that high."

What?? Since when can wolves even paint?  This movie is full of lunatic stuff like that..


I haven't seen this movie yet, but I don't see why I shouldn't chime in....

In this particular case, could it be that the characters are just stupid and not the director, producer, etc?  Sometimes, there are simply stupid characters in a story.


Phil

Logged
e-mail Reply: 30 - 136
George Willson
Posted: March 26th, 2006, 7:47pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Doctor who? Yes, quite right.

Location
Broken Arrow
Posts
3591
Posts Per Day
0.51

Quoted from dogglebe
I haven't seen this movie yet, but I don't see why I shouldn't chime in....

In this particular case, could it be that the characters are just stupid and not the director, producer, etc?  Sometimes, there are simply stupid characters in a story.


Honestly, the way I saw the point with the wolves and painting was that these creatures did not look like wolves at all, but these weird nightmarish creatures and "wolves" was the best description they had. I mean, there was a territorial dispute with them; can't happen with real wolves. They get upset only when their territory is encroached; also can't happen with wolves. They don't invade the Village unless provoked; also can't happen with wolves. I saw their wolf description as their best guess of how to refer to these creatures they have this uneasy truce with.

Whew, that's as non-spoiler as I can get there.



Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 31 - 136
IceRose
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 12:44pm Report to Moderator
New


Want: Producer, and/or Publisher

Location
Rural Utah
Posts
91
Posts Per Day
0.01
That's probably exactly how the author intended it.  The problem with huge reveals, is  it lowers the re-watchability of the movie.

Phil, it really depends on the old monster movie and how old lol.

Anyone seen Mothman Prophesies?

Tony, go right ahead, I'd love to hear about them.

On sequels I guess my questions is more, Why do they make horrible sequels.  With a little extra effort they could make them worth while, or make an excellent new movie.

Sara


Logged Offline
Site Private Message YIM Reply: 32 - 136
George Willson
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 2:04pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Doctor who? Yes, quite right.

Location
Broken Arrow
Posts
3591
Posts Per Day
0.51
There was a thread about sequels that I had started some time ago.

http://www.simplyscripts.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-screenwrite/m-1121238170/

I am a fan of sequels, and there are some films I didn't start watching until it had a sequel (Pitch Black being a big example). James Cameron is an excellent example of a good sequel having scored with both Aliens and Terminator 2. The Godfather Part II is the only sequel to score big at the Oscars.

I think sequels bomb because the writers try to rewrite the first movie instead of writing a new one with the stuff we want to see -- more development.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 33 - 136
IceRose
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 2:58pm Report to Moderator
New


Want: Producer, and/or Publisher

Location
Rural Utah
Posts
91
Posts Per Day
0.01
I will check it out.  There are several excellent sequels.  

And you are probably right, they do try to rewrite the first one, or just try to make a story out of nothing, or use nothing for a story, one of the two.

Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick were good, I enjoyed them.  Was there one before Pitch Black???   Although in Chronicles it seems like everyone got their hair cuts from a weed wacker, gotta watch out for those things.

I never said there weren't good ones, I just wondered why they make bad ones, because there is ample proof that several sequels work and are sometimes even better than the first.



Revision History (1 edits)
IceRose  -  March 27th, 2006, 3:09pm
Logged Offline
Site Private Message YIM Reply: 34 - 136
dogglebe
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 3:25pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from IceRose
Phil, it really depends on the old monster movie and how old lol.


Sometime in the 1940s.


Phil

Logged
e-mail Reply: 35 - 136
dogglebe
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 3:40pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from George Willson
I think sequels bomb because the writers try to rewrite the first movie instead of writing a new one with the stuff we want to see -- more development.


Similarly, I always felt that sequels bomb because some movies are complete in and of itself.  The writer isn't thinking of a sequel and wraps up the story.  Franchises like Batman, Superman, Spiderman and X-men are written with sequels in mind.  Sequels will work.  Other franchises like Jaws, Halloween and Cheaper By The Dozen were wrapped up in thte first movie.  The writer/studio  should consider whether there is a sequel in the future.


Phil

Logged
e-mail Reply: 36 - 136
George Willson
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 4:27pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Doctor who? Yes, quite right.

Location
Broken Arrow
Posts
3591
Posts Per Day
0.51

Quoted from IceRose
Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick were good, I enjoyed them.  Was there one before Pitch Black???   Although in Chronicles it seems like everyone got their hair cuts from a weed wacker, gotta watch out for those things.


Pitch Black was first. There was a short inbetween story called Dark Fury. The Chronicles of Riddick is the most recent one, though there have been rumors of another one. Either PS2 or Xbox has a video game prequel called Butcher Bay.

Riddick is not the first to pull the video game crossover, though. To get the full story of the Matrix, you have to watch The Matrix, watch the Animatrix (most specifically for this plotline, Last Flight of the Osiris), play the video game Enter th Matrix, and then watch Reloaded as you play parts of the video game since Enter the Matrix follows Ghost and the pilot chick Morpheus is sweet on (forgot her name) and parallels partsof Matrix Reloaded. There are also Matrix comic books which deepen that universe and to follow to coincide with the other stories, there is The Matrix online. Now THERE'S a franchise.


Quoted from dogglebe
Similarly, I always felt that sequels bomb because some movies are complete in and of itself


I felt the same way about The Highlander. The story was done. He was the last one. I've never watched the sequels, so I don't know how they manage to pull a continuing storyline out of their butts, but I'm sure something was concocted that ruined that perfect ending. Alien3 is another sequel that pissed me off. Aliens had a perfect ending. Alien3 destroyed it.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 37 - 136
IceRose
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 8:26pm Report to Moderator
New


Want: Producer, and/or Publisher

Location
Rural Utah
Posts
91
Posts Per Day
0.01
Exactly Phil,
Those that complete themselves, should NOT have sequels.  They are pointless and show that they are merely making money on a name, and have no real story to tell.  

Highlander pissed me off.  He kills all the immortals, gains all that power then...there are suddenly hundreds more immortals???  Okay lost me there.

Okay, I have seen all of those and the game is or soon will be out.

Matrix pissed me off.  The second and third should have been Rise of the Smiths, as he was the total focus.  I have also seen/played most of the inbetween.  Can't even look at any of them since the third one came out.

They had a chance at brilliance, then blew it, pure and simple.  Smith was dead let him stay dead.

Anything I write that has a sequel or series in mind, is thought of before I finish the first and are woven in, not oh look, I think I'll write another one because I can't come up with anything new.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message YIM Reply: 38 - 136
FilmMaker06
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 8:36pm Report to Moderator
Been Around


Posts
541
Posts Per Day
0.08
What is strange to me is that this is in the Collaborative Effort board...kind of a strange place to put it, eh?
Logged
Private Message Reply: 39 - 136
George Willson
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 8:54pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Doctor who? Yes, quite right.

Location
Broken Arrow
Posts
3591
Posts Per Day
0.51
That's pretty much how I work. I integrate something into the fabric of the story that makes it appear complete but upon retrospect, it becomes clear that there was a single loose end left untied.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 40 - 136
IceRose
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 9:05pm Report to Moderator
New


Want: Producer, and/or Publisher

Location
Rural Utah
Posts
91
Posts Per Day
0.01

Quoted from FilmMaker06
What is strange to me is that this is in the Collaborative Effort board...kind of a strange place to put it, eh?



I'm sorry, I didn't know where else to put it.  The discussion this spun off from was from here.

George, that's interesting, most of mine are blatantly visible.  Some I leave a twist at the end that leaves it a little open and that I have no intention of ever writing a sequel, I just want that "Hey wait a minute at the end."


Logged Offline
Site Private Message YIM Reply: 41 - 136
Herodreamer79
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 9:21pm Report to Moderator
New



Posts
136
Posts Per Day
0.02

Quoted from bert


Is it a spoiler to say that a movie is completely idiotic?  And not just the end either -- I can't even count the number of eye-rolling moments in this movie.  Here -- I'll give you one -- out of dozens --
There is red paint on the doors -- somebody speculates that "the wolves did it" -- another character says, with all seriousness, "Wolves can't reach that high."
.



SPOILER ALERT

i'll try to explain this so it makes sense...

you have to take that line in the context of the character

keep in mind bert.. that the elders were the ones putting red paint on the doors dressed as the creatures... they had used the "wild animal" for the small animals turning up dead (William hurts character said he didnt know who was killing the small animals suspected it some someone else)

the character who said "wolves cant jump that high" was an elder... in the context of the character... she was simply pointing out... their wild animal story was not going to work any longer

thats how i took that line anyway after re-watching it


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 42 - 136
George Willson
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 9:37pm Report to Moderator
Of The Ancients


Doctor who? Yes, quite right.

Location
Broken Arrow
Posts
3591
Posts Per Day
0.51
Hero, we were trying to avoid spoilers of The Village in this thread. There is an entire other thread for a spoiler discussion.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 43 - 136
dogglebe
Posted: March 27th, 2006, 11:27pm Report to Moderator
Guest User




Quoted from IceRose
Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick were good, I enjoyed them.  Was there one before Pitch Black???   Although in Chronicles it seems like everyone got their hair cuts from a weed wacker, gotta watch out for those things.


While I liked Pitch Black, I didn't like Riddick at all.

In Pitch Black, Riddick was a thinker.  He made the characters thinks.  He made the viewers think.  In Riddick, he just played an bland action figure.


Phil
Logged
e-mail Reply: 44 - 136
 Pages: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 » : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Simplyscripts Collaborative Effort  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006