All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
I don't think it's a deal-breaker at all, but I could understand reticence from POC about a white person telling this story.
I (as another white person) think it would be fine if the end product is thoughtful and you've really made attempts to collaborate in your research by speaking with people of Zulu descent or people knowledgeable about the culture.
The reason some people are opposed to white people telling black stories is because there's a long, long history of entertainment media co-opting very specific black stories for profit that is only held by white people. But I don't think that's the case here nor is it your intentions (having not read your graphic novel) and I think that is happening less and less these days.
Do not listen to particular groups of (again, mostly white) people on Tumblr etc who are embedded in identity politics, because they'll say insane things like a white writer can NEVER write a diverse character or a straight writer can never write an LGBT character. If that were true, how are stories meant to become more diverse?
I think the issue you'll run into here is the level of sensitivity/accuracy afforded to a very real culture. I'm sure you haven't written something offensive to Zulu people but it's just something to consider. Don't be afraid to share you work and request feedback on the cultural aspects of it. And if you do get specific feedback try to engage it in good faith (again, as I'm sure you would).
Haha. That's good! Some people feel differently (like myself, as stated). Here in Canada, for instance, the question of Indigenous stories and representation is a massive, never-ending fight.
Now that I'm done my work week, I'd happily wade into a big argument here -- I think some of the arguments made above are very silly -- but unfortunately I happen to agree with the majority view. Of course anyone can write about anything. Of course you should ignore anyone who calls you racist before even reading the work. Of course you should follow the stories you're passionate about wherever they lead.
Luckily, this has been the standard for a long time and continues to be the standard now. People can and do make whatever they want in every possible storytelling medium.
I kinda feel like what everyone actually means when they say so-and-so isn't "allowed" is just that it's harder to get funding from mainstream companies on projects where the identity optics are bad. Well, the market's never fair. Writers can play it safe or follow their passions -- that's always been the deal.
Good diplomacy. I like your style, with equaling back for harmony after you've invested your input. No need to hammer it when done.
I had a well-minded text prepared in my pipeline as well… then you done somehow same different, so I haven't pushed. Still, I think I have to affirm you for your personal inner peace Ha . My choice.
Almost forgot Paul: Would you shy away from confronting the families?
I mean, even if they would give you no positive signs to your request, you would have a great opportunity to recheck your feelings and reflect if it's worth it. If you then still choose to nevertheless do it, you still can look in the mirror because you know the exact price for your actions and the consequences that face you for. Hope you understand what I'm trying to say.
Anyway, Warren, the project and circumstances sound interesting. Repercussion not always bad. And there's also a future look back of what is done, which is unclear yet. Or maybe you'll make some unexpected friends or win some sympathy from the opposing fraction/party. That would be great. Good luck.