SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
Welcome, Guest.
It is August 20th, 2019, 4:36pm
Please login or register.
Was PortalRecent PostsHome Help Calendar Search Register Login
If you wish to join this discussion board, please send me a message. Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship

Scripts Studios are posting for award consideration
The Beginners Guide to the SimplyScripts Discussion Board (WIP)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production | Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the and domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Unproduced Screenplay Discussion    Short Scripts  ›  Araucaria Moderators: bert
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    Araucaria  (currently 2436 views)
Posted: August 6th, 2005, 11:21am Report to Moderator

So, what are you writing?

Posts Per Day
Araucaria by Martin Lancaster - Short, Thriller, Suspense - A detective races to decipher a cryptic message left by a serial bomber. He soon realizes that the message reveals not the killer's identity, but the identity oof his next victim.  Written as an entry to the NYCMidnight screenplay contest. Genre: Suspense  Subject: An Old Record - pdf, format

Visit for what is new on the site.

You will miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
- Wayne Gretzky
Site Private Message
Posted: August 6th, 2005, 12:24pm Report to Moderator
Board Moderator

Buy the ticket, take the ride

That's me in the corner
Posts Per Day
I was hoping some new stuff would go up today. †This is the one I was waiting to read. †An excellent piece of work for the time you had, Martin. †You and Phil really veered off in different directions, with good stories from both of you. †I think Phil's overall approach was more clever, but I'll still give you the nod because I did not like that we never got to "hear" the album in Phil's. †But that has already been hashed out on his own thread. †Back to yours.

Is the "board name"/"new story" thing going to be a continuing trend?

* †Right off the bat, I didn't much care for the super, mostly because I have no earthly idea what a monkey puzzle is, and I would bet most do not.
* †This next complaint might be silly, and might only be confusing for those giving the story a careful read. †Maybe it's just me, but I thought the picture on Harry's desk -- of Maria and his son -- had been sent to him by the bomber. †I was like, "what are you just sitting around for, moron!" †And I was going to call you on it, too. †It was not until page 7 or so that I realized it was just an ordinary photo on his desk, not from the bomber. †So I'll just say that it confused me (maybe just me, tho), and leave it at that.
* †The lone typo: †Page 8, Harry's dialogue: " the to my..."
* †I really did not like the use of stand-alone "BANG!"s in the script when describing little collisions with the toy car. †Twice you did this, and both times I thought something had blown up. †I mean, you are doing a story about a mad bomber here, so you ought to save the "BANG!"s for when you really need them.
* †Phil's story stood alone, but this one feels "ongoing" -- there is clearly more to tell, both before and after the events of this story. †I don't know if that is a strength or a weakness in this contest. †Depends on the judge, probably. †I'm just saying.

So I liked it, but I remain a little confused about the role of the tree. †You did a fine job with your submission, and both you and Phil will have to keep us posted as these stories progress through the ranks.

Hey, it's my tiny, little IMDb!

Revision History (1 edits)
bert  -  August 6th, 2005, 12:27pm
Private Message Reply: 1 - 4
Posted: August 6th, 2005, 8:47pm Report to Moderator

"Good, bad...I'm the guy with the gun."

Oxnard, CA
Posts Per Day
I really enjoyed this script. Nice and suspenseful.  My only criticism:  Expand!  You got something good here, man.  Make it full length and you got a blockbuster...maybe.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 4
Posted: August 7th, 2005, 7:15am Report to Moderator

Frankfurt, Germany
Posts Per Day
Thanks for reading this guys. You're both right, the idea really needs to be feature length to realise its potential. I knew this while I was writing but given the timeframe I didn't have time think up something else.

Bert- about the BANGs, it's a cheap trick, I know, but you said you thought something had blown up so I guess it worked to an extent.

As for 'Araucaria', this is a name that the bomber has assumed. It is also an obscure reference that I doubt anyone will spot. 'Araucaria' is the pseudonym of a guy who's been setting cryptic crosswords for The Guardian newspaper for around 60 years.
Private Message Reply: 3 - 4
Breanne Mattson
Posted: October 22nd, 2005, 12:15am Report to Moderator
Old Timer

Posts Per Day

This review falls into the category of ďI read this but didnít write a review at the time so Iím going back and doing it now.Ē Itís based on a slightly hazy memory.

I apologize for that.

Der Spieler, I have no doubt that you are one of the best writers at this site. Itís so nice to read material that is well written and without a slew of spelling and grammar errors.

I mean, I know there are a lot of early drafts here, but come on. For crying out loud, I canít conceive of someone who calls himself a writer and doesnít even proofread his logline.

Anyway, Iíll hop down off my soapbox and get back to business. (I had a couple tonight if you know what I mean).

It has very good dramatic beats. Good rhythm. Good balance between the suspense building and the just plain good ole storytelling.

Sometimes the endings where (*spoiler alert*) the main character (or in this case, pivotal supporting characters) get(s) killed off is kind of a copout. I donít think thatís the case here really but it did sort of leave me with the feeling thatÖwell, like maybe I wasnít really at the end. Like maybe there should have been more.

Donít get me wrong. Itís okay with me that the bomber didnít get caught. But there was no reconciliation between the main character and the bomber, whose relationship to one another seemed to me to be the foundation of the story.

For my money, ďThe Universe Explained?Ē is one of the best shorts on this site. I still think about it occasionally, which is the true mark of good writing in my opinion. ďAraucariaĒ seems to me to have aspiration plenty while the inspiration hasnít been fully revealed.

If this was Part I of a larger story, it was great. As a work all on its own, it did sort of leave me saying to myself,  ďhey, what aboutÖ.?Ē

Overall, itís really good. It just left me wanting more, thatĎs all. Hey, though, thatís a good thing really.


Private Message Reply: 4 - 4
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Short Scripts  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on

Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006