SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 30th, 2024, 2:35pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Discussion of...    Movie/Television Rumor  ›  Star Trek Into Darkness Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 6 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Star Trek Into Darkness  (currently 6731 views)
Hugh Hoyland
Posted: December 7th, 2012, 12:06am Report to Moderator
New



Location
Florida
Posts
328
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from Electric Dreamer


Pretty sure it's a revamped version of this original series character...

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Gary_Mitchell

But yeah, he does a ton of Khan-like stuff in the teaser!

Regards,
E.D.


Thats who I thought it was to. But I dont see the glowing mutant silver eyes. And Mitchell didnt have a slightly british accent either. This could be someone we havent seen before. Khan you guess who it is?

HGW



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 15 - 21
Heretic
Posted: December 7th, 2012, 3:42am Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts
2023
Posts Per Day
0.28
In day-to-day life I refuse to refer to Abrams' 2009 film by its title, because I don't feel it has any relation to the franchise it's supposedly a part of. Instead I call it GSAF, or Generic Space Action Film.

I'd say Abrams' pandering shit tends to be better than the average pandering shit, so GSAF 2 should be a reasonably entertaining generic space action film, too. Ho ho.

The teaser, like most trailers, takes itself too seriously. It's like every time a blockbuster comes out now it's supposed to be the most epic event of our lives -- never mind the fact Hollywood can rarely manage to even tell us a real story lately. The first one was probably one of the best examples of a by-the-numbers Hollywood script in a long time, though (well, that and Avengers), and I imagine the sequel will be similarly tight.

Personally I would point to TMP, Khan, Voyage, Generations, and Contact as all being pretty strong -- but highly flawed -- examples of Star Trek being done right on the big screen, and on relatively tiny budgets, to boot. In terms of what I think Star Trek should be, everything has been better than the moronic puerility of '09 (including Frontier, and I don't say that lightly)...at least the rest of the films are about genuine adults. But in terms of what's realistic for a "Star Trek movie" right now -- junk food -- I imagine GSAF 2 will be appropriately loud, fast, entertaining, forgettable, and bad for you. If nothing else, few things sound better than that Giacchino theme in a big theatre.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 16 - 21
DanBall
Posted: December 7th, 2012, 7:45am Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from bert


Except for the Spock/Uhura hook-up.

That is the most retarded decision in the history of the franchise.


From the trailer, it looks like she hooks up with Scotty. Star Trek V, anyone? Wonder if she'll bring a bag of potato chips to the bridge again? Lol


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 17 - 21
Electric Dreamer
Posted: December 7th, 2012, 11:43am Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Taking a long vacation from the holidays.

Location
Los Angeles
Posts
2740
Posts Per Day
0.55

Quoted from bert


Except for the Spock/Uhura hook-up.

That is the most retarded decision in the history of the franchise.


Agreed...

Only because I was hoping for a three way with Miss Green Bean.
The original series was known for breaking social taboos!

E.D.


LATEST NEWS

CineVita Films
is producing a short based on my new feature!

A list of my scripts can be found here.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 18 - 21
DanBall
Posted: December 7th, 2012, 12:34pm Report to Moderator
New


It's okay with me.

Location
Columbus, IN
Posts
285
Posts Per Day
0.07

Quoted from Heretic
In day-to-day life I refuse to refer to Abrams' 2009 film by its title, because I don't feel it has any relation to the franchise it's supposedly a part of. Instead I call it GSAF, or Generic Space Action Film.

I'd say Abrams' pandering shit tends to be better than the average pandering shit, so GSAF 2 should be a reasonably entertaining generic space action film, too. Ho ho.

The teaser, like most trailers, takes itself too seriously. It's like every time a blockbuster comes out now it's supposed to be the most epic event of our lives -- never mind the fact Hollywood can rarely manage to even tell us a real story lately. The first one was probably one of the best examples of a by-the-numbers Hollywood script in a long time, though (well, that and Avengers), and I imagine the sequel will be similarly tight.

Personally I would point to TMP, Khan, Voyage, Generations, and Contact as all being pretty strong -- but highly flawed -- examples of Star Trek being done right on the big screen, and on relatively tiny budgets, to boot. In terms of what I think Star Trek should be, everything has been better than the moronic puerility of '09 (including Frontier, and I don't say that lightly)...at least the rest of the films are about genuine adults. But in terms of what's realistic for a "Star Trek movie" right now -- junk food -- I imagine GSAF 2 will be appropriately loud, fast, entertaining, forgettable, and bad for you.


YES.

Boy, you hate GSAF more than I do! Let's be friends.


Quoted Text
If nothing else, few things sound better than that Giacchino theme in a big theatre.


Jerry Goldsmith's main theme from The Motion Picture!


"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."

THE PINBALL WARRIOR (scifi, WIP, ~30 pg.)
A STAND AGAINST EVIL (short, 9 pg.)
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 19 - 21
marriot
Posted: December 7th, 2012, 7:43pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
UK
Posts
93
Posts Per Day
0.02
I quit caring about the new Star Trek [edit GSAF lol] after the Spock vs Kirk debate in the last un... can't believe the film actually started so good, and THEN ruined it.

Up to that point it was getting me hopeful, after that it went back to the recent trend for set-piece action sequences linked by unmitigated drivel. What happened, they only paid a pro writer for the first 20 pages?

Still, where there's a franchise, there's hope - look how far Batman's come since the Joel Schumacher debacle. So maybe I'll risk a little caring again...


Logged
Private Message Reply: 20 - 21
CoopBazinga
Posted: December 9th, 2012, 7:36pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
Perth, Australia
Posts
1175
Posts Per Day
0.26
I’m certainly not going to debate what was good or bad with the previous outings, leave that to the Trekkie’s. All I can say is that I enjoyed the reboot in ’09 and this trailer did enough to wet my appetite for next year.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 21 - 21
 Pages: « 1, 2 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie/Television Rumor  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006