All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
But yeah, he does a ton of Khan-like stuff in the teaser!
Regards, E.D.
Thats who I thought it was to. But I dont see the glowing mutant silver eyes. And Mitchell didnt have a slightly british accent either. This could be someone we havent seen before. Khan you guess who it is?
In day-to-day life I refuse to refer to Abrams' 2009 film by its title, because I don't feel it has any relation to the franchise it's supposedly a part of. Instead I call it GSAF, or Generic Space Action Film.
I'd say Abrams' pandering shit tends to be better than the average pandering shit, so GSAF 2 should be a reasonably entertaining generic space action film, too. Ho ho.
The teaser, like most trailers, takes itself too seriously. It's like every time a blockbuster comes out now it's supposed to be the most epic event of our lives -- never mind the fact Hollywood can rarely manage to even tell us a real story lately. The first one was probably one of the best examples of a by-the-numbers Hollywood script in a long time, though (well, that and Avengers), and I imagine the sequel will be similarly tight.
Personally I would point to TMP, Khan, Voyage, Generations, and Contact as all being pretty strong -- but highly flawed -- examples of Star Trek being done right on the big screen, and on relatively tiny budgets, to boot. In terms of what I think Star Trek should be, everything has been better than the moronic puerility of '09 (including Frontier, and I don't say that lightly)...at least the rest of the films are about genuine adults. But in terms of what's realistic for a "Star Trek movie" right now -- junk food -- I imagine GSAF 2 will be appropriately loud, fast, entertaining, forgettable, and bad for you. If nothing else, few things sound better than that Giacchino theme in a big theatre.
In day-to-day life I refuse to refer to Abrams' 2009 film by its title, because I don't feel it has any relation to the franchise it's supposedly a part of. Instead I call it GSAF, or Generic Space Action Film.
I'd say Abrams' pandering shit tends to be better than the average pandering shit, so GSAF 2 should be a reasonably entertaining generic space action film, too. Ho ho.
The teaser, like most trailers, takes itself too seriously. It's like every time a blockbuster comes out now it's supposed to be the most epic event of our lives -- never mind the fact Hollywood can rarely manage to even tell us a real story lately. The first one was probably one of the best examples of a by-the-numbers Hollywood script in a long time, though (well, that and Avengers), and I imagine the sequel will be similarly tight.
Personally I would point to TMP, Khan, Voyage, Generations, and Contact as all being pretty strong -- but highly flawed -- examples of Star Trek being done right on the big screen, and on relatively tiny budgets, to boot. In terms of what I think Star Trek should be, everything has been better than the moronic puerility of '09 (including Frontier, and I don't say that lightly)...at least the rest of the films are about genuine adults. But in terms of what's realistic for a "Star Trek movie" right now -- junk food -- I imagine GSAF 2 will be appropriately loud, fast, entertaining, forgettable, and bad for you.
YES.
Boy, you hate GSAF more than I do! Let's be friends.
Quoted Text
If nothing else, few things sound better than that Giacchino theme in a big theatre.
Jerry Goldsmith's main theme from The Motion Picture!
"I remember a time of chaos. Ruined dreams. This wasted land. But most of all, I remember The Road Warrior. The man we called 'Max'."
I quit caring about the new Star Trek [edit GSAF lol] after the Spock vs Kirk debate in the last un... can't believe the film actually started so good, and THEN ruined it.
Up to that point it was getting me hopeful, after that it went back to the recent trend for set-piece action sequences linked by unmitigated drivel. What happened, they only paid a pro writer for the first 20 pages?
Still, where there's a franchise, there's hope - look how far Batman's come since the Joel Schumacher debacle. So maybe I'll risk a little caring again...
I’m certainly not going to debate what was good or bad with the previous outings, leave that to the Trekkie’s. All I can say is that I enjoyed the reboot in ’09 and this trailer did enough to wet my appetite for next year.