SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is April 28th, 2024, 8:33pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Reviews    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  ›  Spider-Man 2 Moderators: Nixon
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 17 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2, 3, 4 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    Spider-Man 2  (currently 3346 views)
Heretic
Posted: July 26th, 2004, 2:12am Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts
2023
Posts Per Day
0.28
Spidey 2 on par with the first two Superman films?

That's stiff competition.

But you know what?  I'll agree.  I think Spiderman 2 was right on up there.  I still think Superman is the best comic book hero movie ever.  

Ladies and gentlemen, I'd just like to remind you that despite this incident, New York's subway system is still our safest and most efficient mode of transportation.

For god's sakes think of the people!

..sorry.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 45 - 53
sheepdogg_plankton
Posted: July 27th, 2004, 3:02pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



The Empire Strikes Back is one of the best movies ever.  You know, I really think that the 2nd one was for the fans of the comic book.  I know I'm one (and have been since I was, like, 10) and looking back on all of my comics and graphic novels I have in a spare closet in my apartment, a lot of shots, scenes, lines, and plot points seemed to have been inspired by the comic book.  When I went to look at the credits on imdb, I half-expected Stan Lee to be under the screenwriting credit.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 46 - 53
Agent Smith
Posted: September 3rd, 2005, 8:56am Report to Moderator
New


Location
God's Own Country
Posts
36
Posts Per Day
0.01
“ Trailer Rocked, Movie Sucked. ”

Sorry for this comment; But I have nothing else to say. I was a huge fan of Sam Raimi’s first Spiderman. When he came up with second chapter by watching those trailers, Behind the scenes footages, premier notes, I expected a better sequel. But what I got.. a disgusting insulted trash.

I was completely SUCKED UP; it neither comes under a love story or action movie. I was the most stupid person to expect such greater stories from Colombia pictures. I got a stupid chubby love story. It was Crap; It’s simply a Movie for the Sissies.

Spiderman 2 (Spoilers******)

I don’t know who scripted this screwing story, being Spiderman the script didn’t give Parker a dual personality. After the first original movie he must have something developed in his character but the script shows Parker like “he was a looser, he is a looser and he always be a looser.”

Tobey is still best in portraying Girly Peter Parker. Only God knows whether he have an expression called ‘Anger’. Despite his body image I accept him as the confused Peter Parker in first movie which was well played by him. But this time, a role which was well established now in the second run, were fans wanted to see his mature dark side Tobey shows his sissy side. Weak in dialogue presentation, no thick sound, no extreme expression he looked like a Bisexual chicken in Spidy/Parker costume. Also Kirsten Dunst was the worst part of the movie. MJ, a gorgeous character supposed to be was more like a whore in Kirsten’s hand. I hate J.K. Simmons from the first movie. He changed the enraged J. Jonah Jameson into an angry buffoon. Alfred Molina also sucked up his negative part; he has no mannerism in portraying the arch enemy which was done perfectly by the talented Willem Dafoe in the first movie. After Dafoe’s surprise cameo, the only thing excited me in this movie was the performance of James Franco as a tortured soul thirsty for revenge. I am sure he will make a great villain like Dafoe in the coming chapter.

The great villain in this movie was Sam Raimi. When the first movie released I always imagined Raimi’s versatile take on - MJ discovering the truth ‘Parker is Spiderman’. But I never expected he would do this much destruction to this franchise. Seems that entire people and their children plus their pets, discovered that Peter Parker is Spider-Man. Why he did such freaking turn-overs on Peter's secret identity. Raimi raped Spiderman and all his fans by doing this idiotic mastery.

Also Danny Elfman failed miserably for giving a thrilling score comparing with the smashing music on the trailers. The only best thing from this movie is its trailer as well as the trailer music, which misguided me and lots of others for seeing this crap.

All in all, the weak screenplay with ridicules storylines makes this lame chapter a big disappointment for the True fans. I wish Sony would have avoided this sequel; it would have taken a more time gap from the original movie without this lame plot. Making Maguire a more matured aged late 20’s male with some strong sound and built. This movie is only meant for the sissy females and girl men; the true fans and the angry straight guys like me hate these types of junks. “I gave this movie 0 out of 100!”

Spiderman 2 = Movies for the Sissies.

Go and watch if you are that much sissy.


" Humans are disease "
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 47 - 53
Heretic
Posted: September 3rd, 2005, 9:49pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts
2023
Posts Per Day
0.28

Quoted Text
This movie is only meant for the sissy females and girl men; the true fans and the angry straight guys like me hate these types of junks.


That is not appropriate.

Even for an angry straight guy.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 48 - 53
Impulse
Posted: September 3rd, 2005, 9:58pm Report to Moderator
New


Colon Dash Right Parenthesis

Location
MO
Posts
329
Posts Per Day
0.05
"Spider-man 2 = Movies for the Sissies"

You can say you didn't like it and why, but don't call people names if they did like it.
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 49 - 53
Balt
Posted: September 4th, 2005, 8:42pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



AGENT SMITH... I can feel what you're saying, as I find Spiderman 2 very ho hum and mind numbingly boring... however, your post seldom makes sense. You say some very abstract things such as body and sound and sissy movie for girl men and just... wow! I don't know how to read your post.

I do feel your frustration, though. That's a plus. I'm with you on the whole demasking thing and everyone knowing who he is now... I don't like that sort of thing. It takes all the mystery out of the character.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 50 - 53
AmericanSyCo
Posted: September 4th, 2005, 11:07pm Report to Moderator
Guest User



Anybody's opinion will surely be respected on these boards.  No doubt about that.  Just scroll upwards to find the whole talk-back between myself and baltis.  We obviously thoroughly disagreed about this movie, but there is absolutely no problem with that and it's actually encouraged.

But, please, keep the name-calling out of movie reviews.  There's no reason for it.
Logged
e-mail Reply: 51 - 53
Old Time Wesley
Posted: September 5th, 2005, 12:22pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer


Location
Ontario, Canada
Posts
2908
Posts Per Day
0.38
Also take into account that the film is recycled from the first one with a new villain... I do enjoy watching it so I guess that makes me a sissy but I do prefer my 90's cartoon series to this as the perfect Spiderman series (Too bad they won't bring it out on DVD) that's something I'd buy no problems.

I guess you can't expect much from adaptations or you'll be disappointed.


Practice safe lunch: Use a condiment.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 52 - 53
Agent Smith
Posted: September 5th, 2005, 11:03pm Report to Moderator
New


Location
God's Own Country
Posts
36
Posts Per Day
0.01
I mean come on, what was tthe moral of the movie?

I expected a lot from that sequel, but it turns out to be a stupid romantic story meant for the females, even it didn't told in a romantic way.

I can bring great ideas than that.. Everyone said Matrix Sequel Sucked, But for me it was Spiderman Sequels that really Sucked.


" Humans are disease "

Revision History (2 edits; 1 reasons shown)
Agent Smith  -  September 5th, 2005, 11:16pm
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 53 - 53
 Pages: « 1, 2, 3, 4 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Movie, Television and DVD Reviews  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006