All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Spidey 2 on par with the first two Superman films?
That's stiff competition.
But you know what? I'll agree. I think Spiderman 2 was right on up there. I still think Superman is the best comic book hero movie ever.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'd just like to remind you that despite this incident, New York's subway system is still our safest and most efficient mode of transportation.
The Empire Strikes Back is one of the best movies ever. You know, I really think that the 2nd one was for the fans of the comic book. I know I'm one (and have been since I was, like, 10) and looking back on all of my comics and graphic novels I have in a spare closet in my apartment, a lot of shots, scenes, lines, and plot points seemed to have been inspired by the comic book. When I went to look at the credits on imdb, I half-expected Stan Lee to be under the screenwriting credit.
Sorry for this comment; But I have nothing else to say. I was a huge fan of Sam Raimi’s first Spiderman. When he came up with second chapter by watching those trailers, Behind the scenes footages, premier notes, I expected a better sequel. But what I got.. a disgusting insulted trash.
I was completely SUCKED UP; it neither comes under a love story or action movie. I was the most stupid person to expect such greater stories from Colombia pictures. I got a stupid chubby love story. It was Crap; It’s simply a Movie for the Sissies.
Spiderman 2 (Spoilers******)
I don’t know who scripted this screwing story, being Spiderman the script didn’t give Parker a dual personality. After the first original movie he must have something developed in his character but the script shows Parker like “he was a looser, he is a looser and he always be a looser.”
Tobey is still best in portraying Girly Peter Parker. Only God knows whether he have an expression called ‘Anger’. Despite his body image I accept him as the confused Peter Parker in first movie which was well played by him. But this time, a role which was well established now in the second run, were fans wanted to see his mature dark side Tobey shows his sissy side. Weak in dialogue presentation, no thick sound, no extreme expression he looked like a Bisexual chicken in Spidy/Parker costume. Also Kirsten Dunst was the worst part of the movie. MJ, a gorgeous character supposed to be was more like a whore in Kirsten’s hand. I hate J.K. Simmons from the first movie. He changed the enraged J. Jonah Jameson into an angry buffoon. Alfred Molina also sucked up his negative part; he has no mannerism in portraying the arch enemy which was done perfectly by the talented Willem Dafoe in the first movie. After Dafoe’s surprise cameo, the only thing excited me in this movie was the performance of James Franco as a tortured soul thirsty for revenge. I am sure he will make a great villain like Dafoe in the coming chapter.
The great villain in this movie was Sam Raimi. When the first movie released I always imagined Raimi’s versatile take on - MJ discovering the truth ‘Parker is Spiderman’. But I never expected he would do this much destruction to this franchise. Seems that entire people and their children plus their pets, discovered that Peter Parker is Spider-Man. Why he did such freaking turn-overs on Peter's secret identity. Raimi raped Spiderman and all his fans by doing this idiotic mastery.
Also Danny Elfman failed miserably for giving a thrilling score comparing with the smashing music on the trailers. The only best thing from this movie is its trailer as well as the trailer music, which misguided me and lots of others for seeing this crap.
All in all, the weak screenplay with ridicules storylines makes this lame chapter a big disappointment for the True fans. I wish Sony would have avoided this sequel; it would have taken a more time gap from the original movie without this lame plot. Making Maguire a more matured aged late 20’s male with some strong sound and built. This movie is only meant for the sissy females and girl men; the true fans and the angry straight guys like me hate these types of junks. “I gave this movie 0 out of 100!”
AGENT SMITH... I can feel what you're saying, as I find Spiderman 2 very ho hum and mind numbingly boring... however, your post seldom makes sense. You say some very abstract things such as body and sound and sissy movie for girl men and just... wow! I don't know how to read your post.
I do feel your frustration, though. That's a plus. I'm with you on the whole demasking thing and everyone knowing who he is now... I don't like that sort of thing. It takes all the mystery out of the character.
Anybody's opinion will surely be respected on these boards. No doubt about that. Just scroll upwards to find the whole talk-back between myself and baltis. We obviously thoroughly disagreed about this movie, but there is absolutely no problem with that and it's actually encouraged.
But, please, keep the name-calling out of movie reviews. There's no reason for it.
Also take into account that the film is recycled from the first one with a new villain... I do enjoy watching it so I guess that makes me a sissy but I do prefer my 90's cartoon series to this as the perfect Spiderman series (Too bad they won't bring it out on DVD) that's something I'd buy no problems.
I guess you can't expect much from adaptations or you'll be disappointed.