All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Had some more thoughts about Dunne...Dunne seems to be along for the ride. Carla is not HIS target. Carla is the Feds' target. But then Carla is not even the target of the Feds, the Arabs are the targets. Or are they. There doesn't seem to be much going on for anyone to go AFTER, they just follow along this little story until the Senator has Dunne beat to a pulp. Then the story develops. But back to Dunne...in Batman, the Joker WAS the target. Here, Carla is NOT the target even though she is chased because she was at the scene of a crime. When she's gone, the focus is off her and back on to why are the Arabs in Kentucky.
If the Black Witch was Dunne's target, it would make the ending much stronger. As I said, Carla is strong, but she is not the villian here, so there is really no true conflict between Dunne and Carla. I think that's what is fundamentally missing. You create some major emotional stuff between them and it gets sidetracked with the terrorist stuff. Maybe you could overhaul the whole story and see how it could revolve around Dunne and Carla. Cut Joyce completely out of it.
If you had not written it the way you had, and written it in one or two lines, no one would know the difference. But because you wrote it, it's there. The seed is there. You can't take it back for you or anyone that's already read it.
Take that scene. If she is pushed. If she is drug. If she is shoved along. We fill in the blanks while we read. You put "woods" in the slug, so we know where we are. Dense Woods could mean something. Dragging means something. Is she drug kicking and screaming?
Is it important that her dress is torn or that she gets knicked along the way? If so, how could you say it? Drug along, torn and bloody? Something quick. The point of the first scene is to revel the international assasin in a really cool way, which you do. But it's a heavy read for an action movie.
It's not about current trends at all, it's about what does it take to set the scene in the fewest and choicest words possible. You don't have to do that everywhere, but every description has to have meaning in order to put it in there in the first place.
It just reads better and you're not sacrificing your artistic intergrity to do it.
You want to get into that top 1%, be a finalist, make 25 grand, this is where you need to go.
Cloroxmartini,
I understand what you’re saying. Some readers are going to look at it and say it’s over described. Others will look at it and say how nice it is to read something that doesn’t sound like a laundry list of actions.
This isn’t an action movie, it’s a thriller. And actually, yes, I do think it’s important to show the things I describe. I think shots of her bare feet being scratched or her dress getting hung lend to the story. Inferring action is one thing. What you’re suggesting is to strip the action down to the point of it essentially being a sort of list. I’m sorry but I don’t think that’s the best solution.
You’re right, however, that the script can be improved. I do appreciate you pointing out things that bothered you as a reader. That’s always useful in some way. It pushes me to strive to make it better. For that, I sincerely thank you.
For the record, a Nicholl Fellowship winner receives $30,000. I didn’t enter this script this year because I’ve since written scripts I think have a better chance of winning. I do hope reading this script and seeing its flaws help you win one. That’s why I posted it here. So people can see a script that came close to the quarterfinals. It’s hard to find scripts from the competition online. I thought this script might serve some writers by letting them see its flaws - and hopefully some things they felt were done right.
Too much description may have very well been the reason the script didn’t advance. Without any actual feedback from Nicholl staff readers, I can’t say with certainty. The script was entered as a thriller. I think the subgenre was drama. I can’t recall but I’m relatively certain I would never have applied with the subgenre of action. I don’t consider it an action flick at all. I consider it a thriller and a drama that happens to have a lot of action in it.
What just happened here? Did the Black Witch just kill Salman?
That is the way it appears and it’s definitively answered in a few moments.
I think maybe you’re reading it so fast, in such a hurry to find things wrong, that you’re missing things. Most of your questions are answered in the description.
Show me, don't tell me. All I know about Dunne is that he had this romantic moment and then some bad guys came in the office and he shot at them. Nothing reckless about that.
I don’t agree that there’s nothing reckless about it. He leaves citizens behind in danger while he pursues suspects without backup.
Black Witch is caught leaving the Imam's room. Not buying it what with her meticulous planning and poisoning she didn't have an exit strategy? Surely she knew the agents were down stairs?
How exactly would she know that if she was upstairs with the imam the whole time?
What do I think overall? It's not working for me. It lacks something. Maybe some of the things revealed in the last half should be foreshadowed in the beginning.
Everything in the last half is foreshadowed in the first half. Not sure what you’re talking about here.
I’m going to stop here because you’re really just comparing it to a bunch of other films and not really giving it a chance on its own terms.
You didn’t like it. I get it. It’s not for everyone. I’m certain that if I had the financing I could turn this into a killer film. It’s meant to be its own film, not a clone of someone else’s.
I’m sorry you didn’t like it. I want to be the best writer I can be but I think it’s also true that no story can please everyone. I appreciate your thoughts and comments. I really do. And I will actually keep them in mind and use them whenever I rewrite this - or any other script for that matter.
Thank you very much Cloroxmartini. You’ve made me a better writer.
It's not that I didn't like it. I wouldn't have read the whole thing if that was so. I divorce myself from who wrote it and simply read. What kept me going is that I wanted to know about the Black Witch. That's the good part of the story, the strongest part. Is she unique? Not 100%, but enough. Now that I think about it, the beginning, when she first kicks some ass, was she wearing a hood then so that we don't know it's Carla? If so, how could she be so very good and kicking the guy's ass if she couldn't see him? She's precise in everything she does. Can she do it without being able so see?
When I wonder what is going on, it's because it's not clear to me right away. I say "right away" because I'm a big beleiver in not going back and rereading to figure things out. If I have to go backward, or pause, the writing needs to be clearer. It's clear to you because you already know what you see before you puts words to flat screen.
It's only natural to compare similar movies to what I read. When I do that, I bring up things that have worked in one story and might work in another.
If I read something to the end and it doesn't work FOR ME, then I attempt to figure out why and then attempt to convey the reasons best I can.
Now that I think about it, the beginning, when she first kicks some ass, was she wearing a hood then so that we don't know it's Carla? If so, how could she be so very good and kicking the guy's ass if she couldn't see him? She's precise in everything she does. Can she do it without being able so see?
Utbah pulls the bag off her head on page 5. We, the audience, never see her face. The people she kills may or may not see it, depending on the circumstances. When she takes her original place among the hostages, the bag is returned. This is to prevent Salman from immediately noticing she’s there. Salman is the only one she kills while wearing a bag over her head. Even then, there’s a hole cut into it so she can see. That’s all in the script.
When I wonder what is going on, it's because it's not clear to me right away. I say "right away" because I'm a big beleiver in not going back and rereading to figure things out. If I have to go backward, or pause, the writing needs to be clearer. It's clear to you because you already know what you see before you puts words to flat screen.
I understand. I have no problem taking responsibility if my writing isn’t clear enough. It just seems that a lot of your questions are answered in the script. This makes me wonder if you didn’t read so hurriedly that you missed parts. You’re absolutely right that the writer is ultimately responsible for whether or not the writing is clear. But this is also a mystery story and skimming over description is guaranteed to confuse readers.
If I read something to the end and it doesn't work FOR ME, then I attempt to figure out why and then attempt to convey the reasons best I can.
And I thank you for that. There are a lot of reasons something may not work, one of which is personal taste. Another is the possibility that the whole script needs a major rewrite. Just covering all the possibilities.
Yes, the bag is pulled off. With all the action going on, I would think I'd see her face. I guess that's the impression I'm left with to think about later. I really didn't think about being able to see Carla's face during that first battle and compare it to later.
Do you think that even if we did see her face at that time that we would be fascinated if we saw her again as Carla? Villians are shown all the time without the good guys knowing who it is but we know. Sometimes it creates good suspense.
Yes, the bag is pulled off. With all the action going on, I would think I'd see her face. I guess that's the impression I'm left with to think about later. I really didn't think about being able to see Carla's face during that first battle and compare it to later.
Do you think that even if we did see her face at that time that we would be fascinated if we saw her again as Carla? Villians are shown all the time without the good guys knowing who it is but we know. Sometimes it creates good suspense.
I don’t think it would be more suspenseful if the audience saw her face. It would certainly be less mysterious. It would be a bit like telling the audience who the killer is upfront in a murder mystery. As soon as viewers saw the Black Witch in her disguise, they would instantly recognize her. As it is, we find out who the Black Witch is the same time Dunne does (unless someone figures it out). We get to experience the same sense of discovery as our hero. I like that in a film.