SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
Welcome, Guest.
It is February 29th, 2024, 7:43am
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship

Produced Script Database (Updated!)
Scripts of the One Week Challenge.

Scripts studios are posting for award consideration-->

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the and domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    Unproduced Screenplay Discussion    Drama Scripts  ›  The Devil in D Minor Moderators: bert
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

 Pages: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 : All
Recommend Print
  Author    The Devil in D Minor  (currently 17008 views)
Breanne Mattson
Posted: September 25th, 2013, 1:28pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer

Posts Per Day
I was shocked — shocked! — to find this script bumped up in the portal. I saw that and was like wtf? This script is seven years old!

All kidding aside, thank you for the feedback, Steve. I'm not sure who you are. I thought Julio went by reaper. I get the screen names confused.

I agree with most of what you said. All I can say is that I don't really write this way anymore. I've grown a great deal over the last seven years. This script is really very amateurish next to my more recent work. I didn't even fully understand story structure at the time I wrote this — which I think is glaring like a beacon in the night in this script.

The one thing I disagree on is this:

Quoted from Guest
The only issue I have with your characters has to do with your minor ones -- Cop One, Bishop One, Priest (maybe not minor, but . . . ), Doctor -- I hate when writers do that.  It's plain, boring and lazy writing if you ask me.  You should always try to give all your characters their own name, a sense of their own individuality, even if they're minor.

This is an accepted practice in screenwriting. It doesn't bother me at all when I see it in a script. It's something I still do today occasionally, something pros regularly do, and it has never once been an issue when I've dealt with people in the business. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm okay with it.

Everything else, I pretty much agree with. This could definitely improve a lot with a revision. The problem is that it's such an early work. I've matured so much as a writer that this is a script I've moved on from for the most part.

It's interesting, though, the way I can still learn things from a review of it. Your review was really helpful. I appreciate you taking the time to read and offer your thoughts. Thank you!  

Private Message Reply: 105 - 108
Posted: September 25th, 2013, 6:45pm Report to Moderator
Guest User


Read this last night as per Steve's recommendation. I breezed through it in 45 minutes and I enjoyed it all the way through. You don't see many amateur scripts that have the guts to be this different, so props for that.

It's a pretty old script so I won't get too detailed with my notes. I don't have too many issues. A lot of things I'd normally bring up aren't valid because of how surreal and experimental the story is.

At first I was going to mention that there isn't a plot here, at least not until the last 20 pages. But for a script like this, it works. You mentioned not knowing much about story structure when you wrote this, but I wouldn't worry about it. My only hangup about the storytelling is that it takes a long time for things to get started. Nothing really happens for the first 50 pages.

As for more technical stuff... which I think you probably know now, but still... you should label your flashbacks. Also, as previously mentioned, your slugs were very vague. The worst was "INT. ROOM". It was a very visual story, and better slugs would have helped.

I liked the part when Trevor and Julia run into the strung-out kids. Yellow Eyes and the rest of them come across, at first, as the somewhat likable main characters. You empathize with them. But when they run into Julie and Trevor in the woods, they immediately become scary as fuck, and you wonder what they're going to do to Trevor and Julie. Really liked that scene.

There are a lot of things to like here, actually. The characters are very well done, definitely memorable. You have some great images here, too.

I was even okay with most of the dialogue, minus the "you have a worm from consuming raw pork at one point in your life" line. Kind of killed the mood for me right there… raw pork? IMO it sounds kind of on a nose and a little corny. I wouldn't have brought it up unless it was at such an important part in the story.

And... I guess that's all. Again, I enjoyed this one. Great job.

e-mail Reply: 106 - 108
Breanne Mattson
Posted: September 26th, 2013, 11:59am Report to Moderator
Old Timer

Posts Per Day
Another read? Wow.

Thank you, Will. I agree with you for the most part. I did some research into brain diseases at the time and learned about the raw pork and worm and lesion thing. That was what inspired all that. I hadn't really learned to write technical exposition yet, though, as you can tell.

The last time I took a crack at revising this, I found it problematic because I've grown so much as a writer. I think it would take a page one rewrite to really update it. I can't see myself doing that when I've got so many current projects in the works. Still, there are things to be learned from these reviews. A lot of the criticisms are things I don't really think about anymore. I think it's a good thing to have my attention brought back to these little details.

Thanks Will!

Private Message Reply: 107 - 108
Posted: September 26th, 2013, 12:22pm Report to Moderator
Been Around

Posts Per Day
I would love to rewrite this one, but alas, I didn't come up with the idea. haha

Also, glad you liked it, William my boy.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 108 - 108
 Pages: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Drama Scripts  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on

Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006