SimplyScripts Discussion Board
Blog Home - Produced Movie Script Library - TV Scripts - Unproduced Scripts - Contact - Site Map
ScriptSearch
Welcome, Guest.
It is May 19th, 2024, 10:36pm
Please login or register.
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login
Please do read the guidelines that govern behavior on the discussion board. It will make for a much more pleasant experience for everyone. A word about SimplyScripts and Censorship


Produced Script Database (Updated!)

Short Script of the Day | Featured Script of the Month | Featured Short Scripts Available for Production
Submit Your Script

How do I get my film's link and banner here?
All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Forum Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

SimplyScripts Screenwriting Discussion Board    One Week Challenge    1Q '24 OWC  ›  “Fix It?” Or, “Torch It!" - OWC
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print
  Author    “Fix It?” Or, “Torch It!" - OWC  (currently 299 views)
Don
Posted: February 24th, 2024, 11:49am Report to Moderator
Administrator
Administrator


So, what are you writing?

Location
Virginia
Posts
16474
Posts Per Day
1.93
“Fix It?” Or, “Torch It!" by The Renovator - When a new Home Renovation TV Show asks viewers if the owners of a rundown old shack should renovate it, or obliterate it, the answers could get a little fiery!  Short, Comedy, Horror


Visit SimplyScripts.com for what is new on the site.

-------------
You will miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
- Wayne Gretzky

Revision History (1 edits)
LC  -  February 24th, 2024, 5:43pm
Logged Offline
Site Private Message
Zombie Sean
Posted: February 24th, 2024, 5:08pm Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
Colorado
Posts
1547
Posts Per Day
0.23
To the Renovator,

This was hilariously stupid. Like an SNL skit, or a scene from Scary Movie. It had me smiling the entire time though, as everyone was just outrageously annoying (in a good way).

Not much to say on this. Some of the formatting could've been fixed with the sluglines, such as mentioning the peephole view as maybe its own line saying something like "POV MYSTERIOUS FIGURE"

Fun job!

Sean

Revision History (1 edits)
LC  -  February 24th, 2024, 5:44pm
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 15
ghost and_ghostie gal
Posted: February 25th, 2024, 2:19am Report to Moderator
Old Timer



Location
A helluva long way from LA
Posts
1567
Posts Per Day
0.29
Ahoy Renovator --Ok. Full disclosure. I laughed once or twice, just didn't find it funny. I was more amused than anything. Which is surprising cos' I have a warped since of humor. So... it didn't land for me.  I know, comedy is subjective -- so I'm sure other's will luv it. The best word I can think of to describe it is "lively". If I went to Wal-Mart, I'm sure I would find this in the "fun and games" section.   Anywaz, still a fun read. Good job! -A



Revision History (1 edits)
ghost and_ghostie gal  -  February 25th, 2024, 2:36am
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 15
AnthonyCawood
Posted: February 25th, 2024, 2:50pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
UK
Posts
4327
Posts Per Day
1.13
Never been a fan of camera directions in scripts but that's just me.

A few smiles here and one or two chuckles but I think it lost its way in the last couple of pages, I saw the introduction of the Brother coming as soon as they were mentioned earlier but to have them just wander off at the end... didn't work for me.

Oh, and the last scene is INT. SUBURBAN HOME - SAME - but both Ken and the Husaband's actions seem to be written as if they were inside the shack, if you re-write I'd consider the geography of this bit.

  


Anthony Cawood - Award winning screenwriter
Available Short screenplays - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/short-scripts
Available Feature screenplays - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/feature-film-scripts/
Screenwriting articles - http://www.anthonycawood.co.uk/articles
IMDB Link - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6495672/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 3 - 15
kcranford
Posted: February 25th, 2024, 5:18pm Report to Moderator
New


Features:  Christmas Joe

Posts
374
Posts Per Day
0.60
As a watcher of weekend "fixer upper" shows, I got the entire vibe of this, including the host who was jacked up on too much caffeine.  And poor Karen, "lopsided duck lips" LOL.  Turns out that was the least of her problems.  Anyway, this had some funny scenes contrasted with the requisite "hidden bad man" lurking in the old house.  It seems all the criteria of this OWC were met and I got a couple of laughs out of this, so good job writer.  TY for sharing!


Scripts Available:
Christmas Joe (Holiday Drama)
Every Time It Snows (Holiday Drama)
Happy Holi-DNA (Holiday Romance)
Let That Pony Run (Family Drama)
With Love, From Romance (Holiday Romance)
Essex (Historical Drama)

Shorts:
Santuario (OWC Writers' Choice)
Death  (OWC)
Savior  (OWC)
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 15
LC
Posted: February 25th, 2024, 7:50pm Report to Moderator
Administrator



Location
The Great Southern Land
Posts
7658
Posts Per Day
1.34
You have a beginning that is basically Gogglebox - I just discovered the American version is Celebrity Watch Party. If you keep this couple and their child in your story I think you'd be best introducing them as proper characters - as opposed to 'telling' us the info.

The really entertaining story however is what follows.

House Reno shows are dime a dozen and ripe for satire so I really like where you went with this. I was reminded of the The Curse with Emma Stone - the more over the top the better.

The main criticism I have of this is I think the couple watching the show are redundant - they don't really add much when all the action is really 'the show' and its quirky characters.. If the viewing couple had rung in for a chance to win whatever house was being showcased that week, only to win and watch it burn down that would be a different matter.

If you rewrite this I suggest you choose an angle like that to make the couple intrinsically a part of this, (stakes) or ditch them entirely and keep it contained to the actual TV show.

That said this was a really inventive take on the challenge. The house was front and centre, as were your delightful cast of  plastic characters.





Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 15
ChrisBodily
Posted: February 25th, 2024, 7:53pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Posts
572
Posts Per Day
0.16
"Ken and Karen." Poor Barbie. Or is it "Poor Ken?"

This would be a fun makeup job for a budding artist. Cast Fran Drescher! She'd kill this role.


Quoted Text
INT. THE SHACK - LIVING ROOM/SEEN THROUGH A PEEP HOLE IN THE
CEILING - SAME


This slug seems a bit long. I've almost never seen any go past one line.


Quoted Text
As you watch us check out the rest
of the rooms we want you to decide
what Ken and Karen should do.


This sentence is worded funny. I think I understand what you mean. Sorry, I misread that. After "rooms" should be a comma.

Karen's dialogue on p5 seems to be tabbed, except for the first line.

ROFLMAO! I was gonna say "Where's the horror?" This was a pretty solid script. Congrats on entering.


FADE IN:
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 15
ColinS
Posted: February 27th, 2024, 8:06am Report to Moderator
January Project Group


Keep Believing!

Location
UK
Posts
244
Posts Per Day
0.23
Hey Renovator,

Haha, crazy fun script!

Love this below description:-

'An older couple. He’s aged well, but she’s had work done --
more like a total restoration gone bad: lopsided duck lips,
too much of a boob job, and a face lift where the surgeon
must have gotten a hernia.'

Couple of your slugs were a bit confusing for me (too much info in them) and a passage of Karen's dialogue is in the parentheses format, which is a tad slack! However, all is forgiven because you entertained me.

Well done


"Some Day I'll Be Saturday Night..."
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 15
Rob
Posted: February 27th, 2024, 8:45pm Report to Moderator
New


Posts
218
Posts Per Day
0.11
I like that Andy is described as having way too much caffeine, and the New Yark accent detail is great.

Does there need to be a comma in the title? Shouldn't "Fix It? Or, "Torch It?" simply be "Fix It? Or "Torch It!"? By the way, I thought your title was the most interesting of all the contestants.

I got a little confused by the action at the end.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 15
Matthew Taylor
Posted: February 28th, 2024, 11:51am Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Shakespeare's county
Posts
1770
Posts Per Day
0.87
Hi Writer

Your camera directions in the slugs are confusing me. Better to direct what we see in the action/description blocks.

Characters not properly introduced, dialogue immediately after slugs, aforementioned camera directions. The writing is not for me and i think could use some work.

Really cool idea of the couple watching the TV show and cutting between the two, but my biggest issue is, they two are completely unconnected, like two separate stories running consecutively. The couple watching and the TV show should really connect somehow for a truly interesting story.

All the best



Feature

42.2

Two steps to writing a good screenplay:
1) Write a bad one
2) Fix it
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 15
PKCardinal
Posted: February 28th, 2024, 5:27pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Kansas
Posts
1448
Posts Per Day
0.62
I really liked several elements of this script.

First, the show idea is brilliant. I mean, I want to watch a show with this premise. Except, they show two homes: choosing one to fix up and the other to destroy in some hugely inventive way every week. Please get this show made.

The ending felt like being hit by a truck. I picture you writing along, enjoying the process, then realizing the page count is at 5.5. Panic sets in, and you just light the place on fire. It was all just SO hurried to me.

Thankfully, after the challenge, you can go back and expand on the ending some, because you have a lot of good stuff to work with.

The idea of the brother felt a bit shoehorned. But, I'm 100% digging on the idea of the show hosts, while live on the air, stumbling into some horrific event. So, I get why you went in the direction you did.

Overall, lots to like.


PaulKWrites.com

60 Feet Under - Low budget, contained thriller/Feature
The Hand of God - Low budget, semi-contained thriller/Feature
Wait Till Next Year - Disney-style family sports comedy/Feature

Many shorts available for production: comedy, thriller, drama, light horror
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 15
Gum
Posted: February 28th, 2024, 5:49pm Report to Moderator
Been Around



Location
Some travelling Circus...
Posts
832
Posts Per Day
0.41
This was quite the roller coaster ride: up/down, in/out, look here/look there, Fix-it/Torch-it… FIRE!

On a serious note, it’s actually an over the top script, in a good way. Just seemed like you tried to squeeze every last drop out of that mango, and the pit. I had to back track a few times to get my bearings, and I think it stems from all the bold montage slugs and moving back and forth between a television program and some odd couple with a kid and its loaded diaper somewhere out in the suburbs.

Then there’s a peephole in the ceiling, not complaining (I once scripted a freakin’ glory-hole in a confessional booth, so all good), and finally someone running out the backdoor who may or may not have accidentally been blowed-up. Other than that, not sure what else I could add that hasn’t already been said except it was a weird crazy ride. Best of luck.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 15
D.A.Banaszak
Posted: February 28th, 2024, 7:12pm Report to Moderator
New



Location
Northeast, kind of.
Posts
231
Posts Per Day
0.47
I liked your character descriptions. They brought a smile.

The different house descriptions were equally sharp, and colorful. I just wish they didn't describe my house.

The humor was a little too over-the-top for my liking. Then again, my humor is dry and takes a lot of getting used to.

Still, I liked the dark ending.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 12 - 15
Pleb
Posted: February 29th, 2024, 7:32am Report to Moderator
New


Location
UK
Posts
444
Posts Per Day
0.15
Hey writer,

I wanted to like this one more than I did as there's some great elements to it, but was often confused by what was going on, especially the ending, even having read it twice.

Still, I can tell whoever is behind this knows what they're doing and given more time, will be able to really bring out the best of it.

Good luck!


Logged
Private Message Reply: 13 - 15
Gary in Houston
Posted: February 29th, 2024, 6:28pm Report to Moderator
January Project Group



Location
Texas
Posts
1309
Posts Per Day
0.31
A decent idea that spent a little too much time on the asides and characters that added nothing to the story.  I would leave out the viewers at home and focus really on the couple buying the house.  Maybe introduce the guy that takes out Karen at the end somewhere a little earlier so it’s not out of left field.  Also, didn’t one of the hosts say “Fix it Wins”?  If so, why was it being torched?  But the ending was definitely a twist. I liked how you pulled that off.  Best of luck on this.


Some of my scripts:

Bounty (TV Pilot) -- Top 1% of discoverable screenplays on Coverfly
I'll Be Seeing You (short) - OWC winner
The Gambler (short) - OWC winner
Skip (short) - filmed
Country Road 12 (short) - filmed
The Family Man (short) - filmed
The Journeyers (feature) - optioned

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 15
 Pages: 1, 2 » : All
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    1Q '24 OWC  [ previous | next ] Switch to:
Was Portal Recent Posts Home Help Calendar Search Register Login

Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is on
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on


Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.71B © 2001-2006