All screenplays on the simplyscripts.com and simplyscripts.net domain are copyrighted to their respective authors. All rights reserved. This screenplaymay not be used or reproduced for any purpose including educational purposes without the expressed written permission of the author.
Yep - with one exception, it appears all latest reviews are from those who had already started and are now getting to the end of the cycle. We are going to average around 18/19 which will end up being a bit lower than the last two challenges which had considerably less entrants.
So, we may find that (1) a lot peeps wrote more than one script (2) this one brought in more newbies than most OWCs (3) something else
Yes, in your new role you must take everything in "moderation."
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
Some of my scripts:
Bounty (TV Pilot) -- Top 1% of discoverable screenplays on Coverfly I'll Be Seeing You (short) - OWC winner The Gambler (short) - OWC winner Skip (short) - filmed Country Road 12 (short) - filmed The Family Man (short) - filmed The Journeyers (feature) - optioned
Under my handy-dandy spreadsheet, I counted exactly one-half that I gave a grade of "good" or better on. And I'm usually not a very tough grader. Think there were a few pissers along with some new writers involved on this one.
Some of my scripts:
Bounty (TV Pilot) -- Top 1% of discoverable screenplays on Coverfly I'll Be Seeing You (short) - OWC winner The Gambler (short) - OWC winner Skip (short) - filmed Country Road 12 (short) - filmed The Family Man (short) - filmed The Journeyers (feature) - optioned
Could the low review count be down to the number of entries?
As in, some writers put in an entry with the intention of reviewing all, but when they saw the number they had to get through, were put off? and instead of reviewing as many as they could, simply did none.
Could the low review count be down to the number of entries?
As in, some writers put in an entry with the intention of reviewing all, but when they saw the number they had to get through, were put off? and instead of reviewing as many as they could, simply did none.
Doubtful, but who knows.
I saw some writers say right on this thread they had read and reviewed them all, but missed mine and others as well. No clue how or why?
My take is hat peeps are just dumbarses most of the time, and don't give a shit.
I'll be sending my votes in today. In first place, Micro!
I saw some writers say right on this thread they had read and reviewed them all, but missed mine and others as well. No clue how or why?
My take is hat peeps are just dumbarses most of the time, and don't give a shit.
I'll be sending my votes in today. In first place, Micro!
I'm guessing you're talking about me. I didn't say I reviewed them all. I said I was done (reading). I've read them all and scored them all. I haven't reviewed 2 or 3 for various reasons. My intention is to go back and review the remaining scripts, though your reaction (and the fact I obviously skipped yours) gives me pause. This seems to be a rare chance to irritate you with something other than a bad slug...
PaulKWrites.com
60 Feet Under - Low budget, contained thriller/Feature The Hand of God - Low budget, semi-contained thriller/Feature Wait Till Next Year - Disney-style family sports comedy/Feature
Many shorts available for production: comedy, thriller, drama, light horror
If I give my wife a sedative, I should finish up by Thursday.
I’ve had to nag my missus to let me have these next few days since valentines is approaching. It’s annoying how you have to pick between reading scripts or spending time with the missus.